Cargando…

Comparative karyotype analysis and chromosome evolution in the genus Aplastodiscus (Cophomantini, Hylinae, Hylidae)

BACKGROUND: The frogs of the Tribe Cophomantini present, in general, 2n = 24 karyotype, but data on Aplastodiscus showed variation in diploid number from 2n = 24 to 2n = 18. Five species were karyotyped, one of them for the first time, using conventional and molecular cytogenetic techniques, with th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gruber, Simone Lilian, Zina, Juliana, Narimatsu, Hideki, Haddad, Célio Fernando Baptista, Kasahara, Sanae
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3465196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22520864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-13-28
_version_ 1782245525159936000
author Gruber, Simone Lilian
Zina, Juliana
Narimatsu, Hideki
Haddad, Célio Fernando Baptista
Kasahara, Sanae
author_facet Gruber, Simone Lilian
Zina, Juliana
Narimatsu, Hideki
Haddad, Célio Fernando Baptista
Kasahara, Sanae
author_sort Gruber, Simone Lilian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The frogs of the Tribe Cophomantini present, in general, 2n = 24 karyotype, but data on Aplastodiscus showed variation in diploid number from 2n = 24 to 2n = 18. Five species were karyotyped, one of them for the first time, using conventional and molecular cytogenetic techniques, with the aim to perform a comprehensive comparative analysis towards the understanding of chromosome evolution in light of the phylogeny. RESULTS: Aplastodiscus perviridis showed 2n = 24, A. arildae and A. eugenioi, 2n = 22, A. callipygius, 2n = 20, and A. leucopygius, 2n = 18. In the metaphase I cells of two species only bivalents occurred, whereas in A. arildae, A. callipygius, and A. leucopygius one tetravalent was also observed besides the bivalents. BrdU incorporation produced replication bands especially in the largest chromosomes, and a relatively good banding correspondence was noticed among some of them. Silver impregnation and FISH with an rDNA probe identified a single NOR pair: the 11 in A. perviridis and A. arildae; the 6 in A. eugenioi; and the 9 in A. callipygius and A. leucopygius. C-banding showed a predominantly centromeric distribution of the heterochromatin, and in one of the species distinct molecular composition was revealed by CMA(3). The telomeric probe hybridised all chromosome ends and additionally disclosed the presence of telomere-like sequences in centromeric regions of three species. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the hypothesis of 2n = 24 ancestral karyotype for Aplastodiscus, and considering the karyotype differences and similarities, two evolutionary pathways through fusion events were suggested. One of them corresponded to the reduction of 2n = 24 to 22, and the other, the reduction of 2n = 24 to 20, and subsequently to 18. Regarding the NOR, two conditions were recognised: plesiomorphy, represented by the homeologous small-sized NOR-bearing pairs, and derivation, represented by the NOR in a medium-sized pair. In spite of the apparent uniformity of C-banding patterns, heterogeneity in the molecular composition of some repetitive regions was revealed by CMA(3) staining and by interstitial telomeric labelling. The meiotic tetravalent might be due to minute reciprocal translocations or to non-chiasmatic ectopic pairing between terminal repetitive sequences. The comparative cytogenetic analysis allowed to outline the chromosome evolution and contributed to enlighten the relationships within the genus Aplastodiscus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3465196
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34651962012-10-06 Comparative karyotype analysis and chromosome evolution in the genus Aplastodiscus (Cophomantini, Hylinae, Hylidae) Gruber, Simone Lilian Zina, Juliana Narimatsu, Hideki Haddad, Célio Fernando Baptista Kasahara, Sanae BMC Genet Research Article BACKGROUND: The frogs of the Tribe Cophomantini present, in general, 2n = 24 karyotype, but data on Aplastodiscus showed variation in diploid number from 2n = 24 to 2n = 18. Five species were karyotyped, one of them for the first time, using conventional and molecular cytogenetic techniques, with the aim to perform a comprehensive comparative analysis towards the understanding of chromosome evolution in light of the phylogeny. RESULTS: Aplastodiscus perviridis showed 2n = 24, A. arildae and A. eugenioi, 2n = 22, A. callipygius, 2n = 20, and A. leucopygius, 2n = 18. In the metaphase I cells of two species only bivalents occurred, whereas in A. arildae, A. callipygius, and A. leucopygius one tetravalent was also observed besides the bivalents. BrdU incorporation produced replication bands especially in the largest chromosomes, and a relatively good banding correspondence was noticed among some of them. Silver impregnation and FISH with an rDNA probe identified a single NOR pair: the 11 in A. perviridis and A. arildae; the 6 in A. eugenioi; and the 9 in A. callipygius and A. leucopygius. C-banding showed a predominantly centromeric distribution of the heterochromatin, and in one of the species distinct molecular composition was revealed by CMA(3). The telomeric probe hybridised all chromosome ends and additionally disclosed the presence of telomere-like sequences in centromeric regions of three species. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the hypothesis of 2n = 24 ancestral karyotype for Aplastodiscus, and considering the karyotype differences and similarities, two evolutionary pathways through fusion events were suggested. One of them corresponded to the reduction of 2n = 24 to 22, and the other, the reduction of 2n = 24 to 20, and subsequently to 18. Regarding the NOR, two conditions were recognised: plesiomorphy, represented by the homeologous small-sized NOR-bearing pairs, and derivation, represented by the NOR in a medium-sized pair. In spite of the apparent uniformity of C-banding patterns, heterogeneity in the molecular composition of some repetitive regions was revealed by CMA(3) staining and by interstitial telomeric labelling. The meiotic tetravalent might be due to minute reciprocal translocations or to non-chiasmatic ectopic pairing between terminal repetitive sequences. The comparative cytogenetic analysis allowed to outline the chromosome evolution and contributed to enlighten the relationships within the genus Aplastodiscus. BioMed Central 2012-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3465196/ /pubmed/22520864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-13-28 Text en Copyright ©2012 Gruber et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gruber, Simone Lilian
Zina, Juliana
Narimatsu, Hideki
Haddad, Célio Fernando Baptista
Kasahara, Sanae
Comparative karyotype analysis and chromosome evolution in the genus Aplastodiscus (Cophomantini, Hylinae, Hylidae)
title Comparative karyotype analysis and chromosome evolution in the genus Aplastodiscus (Cophomantini, Hylinae, Hylidae)
title_full Comparative karyotype analysis and chromosome evolution in the genus Aplastodiscus (Cophomantini, Hylinae, Hylidae)
title_fullStr Comparative karyotype analysis and chromosome evolution in the genus Aplastodiscus (Cophomantini, Hylinae, Hylidae)
title_full_unstemmed Comparative karyotype analysis and chromosome evolution in the genus Aplastodiscus (Cophomantini, Hylinae, Hylidae)
title_short Comparative karyotype analysis and chromosome evolution in the genus Aplastodiscus (Cophomantini, Hylinae, Hylidae)
title_sort comparative karyotype analysis and chromosome evolution in the genus aplastodiscus (cophomantini, hylinae, hylidae)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3465196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22520864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-13-28
work_keys_str_mv AT grubersimonelilian comparativekaryotypeanalysisandchromosomeevolutioninthegenusaplastodiscuscophomantinihylinaehylidae
AT zinajuliana comparativekaryotypeanalysisandchromosomeevolutioninthegenusaplastodiscuscophomantinihylinaehylidae
AT narimatsuhideki comparativekaryotypeanalysisandchromosomeevolutioninthegenusaplastodiscuscophomantinihylinaehylidae
AT haddadceliofernandobaptista comparativekaryotypeanalysisandchromosomeevolutioninthegenusaplastodiscuscophomantinihylinaehylidae
AT kasaharasanae comparativekaryotypeanalysisandchromosomeevolutioninthegenusaplastodiscuscophomantinihylinaehylidae