Cargando…

Emergency department length of stay for patients requiring mechanical ventilation: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND: Recommendations for acceptable emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS) vary internationally with ≤ 8 h generally considered acceptable. Protracted ED LOS may place critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation at increased risk of adverse events as most EDs are not reso...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rose, Louise, Gray, Sara, Burns, Karen, Atzema, Clare, Kiss, Alex, Worster, Andrew, Scales, Damon C, Rubenfeld, Gordon, Lee, Jacques
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3466156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22494785
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-20-30
_version_ 1782245637585108992
author Rose, Louise
Gray, Sara
Burns, Karen
Atzema, Clare
Kiss, Alex
Worster, Andrew
Scales, Damon C
Rubenfeld, Gordon
Lee, Jacques
author_facet Rose, Louise
Gray, Sara
Burns, Karen
Atzema, Clare
Kiss, Alex
Worster, Andrew
Scales, Damon C
Rubenfeld, Gordon
Lee, Jacques
author_sort Rose, Louise
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recommendations for acceptable emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS) vary internationally with ≤ 8 h generally considered acceptable. Protracted ED LOS may place critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation at increased risk of adverse events as most EDs are not resourced for longitudinal delivery of critical care. Our objective was to quantify the ED LOS for mechanically ventilated patients (invasive and/or non-invasive ventilation [NIV]) and to explore patient and system level predictors of prolonged ED LOS. Additionally, we aimed to describe delivery and monitoring of ventilation in the ED. METHODS: Prospective observational study of ED LOS for all patients receiving mechanical ventilation at four metropolitan EDs in Toronto, Canada over two six-month periods in 2009 and 2010. RESULTS: We identified 618 mechanically ventilated patients which represented 0.5% (95% CI 0.4%–0.5%) of all ED visits. Of these, 484 (78.3%) received invasive ventilation, 118 (19.1%) received NIV; 16 received both during the ED stay. Median Kaplan-Meier estimated duration of ED stay for all patients was 6.4 h (IQR 2.8–14.6). Patients with trauma diagnoses had a shorter median (IQR) LOS, 2.5 h (1.3–5.1), compared to ventilated patients with non-trauma diagnoses, 8.5 h (3.3–14.0) (p <0.001). Patients requiring NIV had a longer ED stay (16.6 h, 8.2–27.9) compared to those receiving invasive ventilation exclusively (4.6 h, 2.2–11.1) and patients receiving both (15.4 h, 6.4–32.6) (p <0.001). Longer ED LOS was associated with ED site and lower priority triage scores. Shorter ED LOS was associated with intubation at another ED prior to transfer. CONCLUSIONS: While patients requiring mechanical ventilation represent a small proportion of overall ED visits these critically ill patients frequently experienced prolonged ED stay especially those treated with NIV, assigned lower priority triage scores at ED presentation, and non-trauma patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3466156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34661562012-10-09 Emergency department length of stay for patients requiring mechanical ventilation: a prospective observational study Rose, Louise Gray, Sara Burns, Karen Atzema, Clare Kiss, Alex Worster, Andrew Scales, Damon C Rubenfeld, Gordon Lee, Jacques Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Recommendations for acceptable emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS) vary internationally with ≤ 8 h generally considered acceptable. Protracted ED LOS may place critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation at increased risk of adverse events as most EDs are not resourced for longitudinal delivery of critical care. Our objective was to quantify the ED LOS for mechanically ventilated patients (invasive and/or non-invasive ventilation [NIV]) and to explore patient and system level predictors of prolonged ED LOS. Additionally, we aimed to describe delivery and monitoring of ventilation in the ED. METHODS: Prospective observational study of ED LOS for all patients receiving mechanical ventilation at four metropolitan EDs in Toronto, Canada over two six-month periods in 2009 and 2010. RESULTS: We identified 618 mechanically ventilated patients which represented 0.5% (95% CI 0.4%–0.5%) of all ED visits. Of these, 484 (78.3%) received invasive ventilation, 118 (19.1%) received NIV; 16 received both during the ED stay. Median Kaplan-Meier estimated duration of ED stay for all patients was 6.4 h (IQR 2.8–14.6). Patients with trauma diagnoses had a shorter median (IQR) LOS, 2.5 h (1.3–5.1), compared to ventilated patients with non-trauma diagnoses, 8.5 h (3.3–14.0) (p <0.001). Patients requiring NIV had a longer ED stay (16.6 h, 8.2–27.9) compared to those receiving invasive ventilation exclusively (4.6 h, 2.2–11.1) and patients receiving both (15.4 h, 6.4–32.6) (p <0.001). Longer ED LOS was associated with ED site and lower priority triage scores. Shorter ED LOS was associated with intubation at another ED prior to transfer. CONCLUSIONS: While patients requiring mechanical ventilation represent a small proportion of overall ED visits these critically ill patients frequently experienced prolonged ED stay especially those treated with NIV, assigned lower priority triage scores at ED presentation, and non-trauma patients. BioMed Central 2012-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3466156/ /pubmed/22494785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-20-30 Text en Copyright ©2012 Rose et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Rose, Louise
Gray, Sara
Burns, Karen
Atzema, Clare
Kiss, Alex
Worster, Andrew
Scales, Damon C
Rubenfeld, Gordon
Lee, Jacques
Emergency department length of stay for patients requiring mechanical ventilation: a prospective observational study
title Emergency department length of stay for patients requiring mechanical ventilation: a prospective observational study
title_full Emergency department length of stay for patients requiring mechanical ventilation: a prospective observational study
title_fullStr Emergency department length of stay for patients requiring mechanical ventilation: a prospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed Emergency department length of stay for patients requiring mechanical ventilation: a prospective observational study
title_short Emergency department length of stay for patients requiring mechanical ventilation: a prospective observational study
title_sort emergency department length of stay for patients requiring mechanical ventilation: a prospective observational study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3466156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22494785
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-20-30
work_keys_str_mv AT roselouise emergencydepartmentlengthofstayforpatientsrequiringmechanicalventilationaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT graysara emergencydepartmentlengthofstayforpatientsrequiringmechanicalventilationaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT burnskaren emergencydepartmentlengthofstayforpatientsrequiringmechanicalventilationaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT atzemaclare emergencydepartmentlengthofstayforpatientsrequiringmechanicalventilationaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT kissalex emergencydepartmentlengthofstayforpatientsrequiringmechanicalventilationaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT worsterandrew emergencydepartmentlengthofstayforpatientsrequiringmechanicalventilationaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT scalesdamonc emergencydepartmentlengthofstayforpatientsrequiringmechanicalventilationaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT rubenfeldgordon emergencydepartmentlengthofstayforpatientsrequiringmechanicalventilationaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT leejacques emergencydepartmentlengthofstayforpatientsrequiringmechanicalventilationaprospectiveobservationalstudy