Cargando…

Ventral and dorsal streams processing visual motion perception (FDG-PET study)

BACKGROUND: Earlier functional imaging studies on visually induced self-motion perception (vection) disclosed a bilateral network of activations within primary and secondary visual cortex areas which was combined with signal decreases, i.e., deactivations, in multisensory vestibular cortex areas. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Becker-Bense, Sandra, Buchholz, Hans-Georg, zu Eulenburg, Peter, Best, Christoph, Bartenstein, Peter, Schreckenberger, Matthias, Dieterich, Marianne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3467181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22800430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-13-81
_version_ 1782245758292983808
author Becker-Bense, Sandra
Buchholz, Hans-Georg
zu Eulenburg, Peter
Best, Christoph
Bartenstein, Peter
Schreckenberger, Matthias
Dieterich, Marianne
author_facet Becker-Bense, Sandra
Buchholz, Hans-Georg
zu Eulenburg, Peter
Best, Christoph
Bartenstein, Peter
Schreckenberger, Matthias
Dieterich, Marianne
author_sort Becker-Bense, Sandra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Earlier functional imaging studies on visually induced self-motion perception (vection) disclosed a bilateral network of activations within primary and secondary visual cortex areas which was combined with signal decreases, i.e., deactivations, in multisensory vestibular cortex areas. This finding led to the concept of a reciprocal inhibitory interaction between the visual and vestibular systems. In order to define areas involved in special aspects of self-motion perception such as intensity and duration of the perceived circular vection (CV) or the amount of head tilt, correlation analyses of the regional cerebral glucose metabolism, rCGM (measured by fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography, FDG-PET) and these perceptual covariates were performed in 14 healthy volunteers. For analyses of the visual-vestibular interaction, the CV data were compared to a random dot motion stimulation condition (not inducing vection) and a control group at rest (no stimulation at all). RESULTS: Group subtraction analyses showed that the visual-vestibular interaction was modified during CV, i.e., the activations within the cerebellar vermis and parieto-occipital areas were enhanced. The correlation analysis between the rCGM and the intensity of visually induced vection, experienced as body tilt, showed a relationship for areas of the multisensory vestibular cortical network (inferior parietal lobule bilaterally, anterior cingulate gyrus), the medial parieto-occipital cortex, the frontal eye fields and the cerebellar vermis. The “earlier” multisensory vestibular areas like the parieto-insular vestibular cortex and the superior temporal gyrus did not appear in the latter analysis. The duration of perceived vection after stimulus stop was positively correlated with rCGM in medial temporal lobe areas bilaterally, which included the (para-)hippocampus, known to be involved in various aspects of memory processing. The amount of head tilt was found to be positively correlated with the rCGM of bilateral basal ganglia regions responsible for the control of motor function of the head. CONCLUSIONS: Our data gave further insights into subfunctions within the complex cortical network involved in the processing of visual-vestibular interaction during CV. Specific areas of this cortical network could be attributed to the ventral stream (“what” pathway) responsible for the duration after stimulus stop and to the dorsal stream (“where/how” pathway) responsible for intensity aspects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3467181
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34671812012-10-10 Ventral and dorsal streams processing visual motion perception (FDG-PET study) Becker-Bense, Sandra Buchholz, Hans-Georg zu Eulenburg, Peter Best, Christoph Bartenstein, Peter Schreckenberger, Matthias Dieterich, Marianne BMC Neurosci Research Article BACKGROUND: Earlier functional imaging studies on visually induced self-motion perception (vection) disclosed a bilateral network of activations within primary and secondary visual cortex areas which was combined with signal decreases, i.e., deactivations, in multisensory vestibular cortex areas. This finding led to the concept of a reciprocal inhibitory interaction between the visual and vestibular systems. In order to define areas involved in special aspects of self-motion perception such as intensity and duration of the perceived circular vection (CV) or the amount of head tilt, correlation analyses of the regional cerebral glucose metabolism, rCGM (measured by fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography, FDG-PET) and these perceptual covariates were performed in 14 healthy volunteers. For analyses of the visual-vestibular interaction, the CV data were compared to a random dot motion stimulation condition (not inducing vection) and a control group at rest (no stimulation at all). RESULTS: Group subtraction analyses showed that the visual-vestibular interaction was modified during CV, i.e., the activations within the cerebellar vermis and parieto-occipital areas were enhanced. The correlation analysis between the rCGM and the intensity of visually induced vection, experienced as body tilt, showed a relationship for areas of the multisensory vestibular cortical network (inferior parietal lobule bilaterally, anterior cingulate gyrus), the medial parieto-occipital cortex, the frontal eye fields and the cerebellar vermis. The “earlier” multisensory vestibular areas like the parieto-insular vestibular cortex and the superior temporal gyrus did not appear in the latter analysis. The duration of perceived vection after stimulus stop was positively correlated with rCGM in medial temporal lobe areas bilaterally, which included the (para-)hippocampus, known to be involved in various aspects of memory processing. The amount of head tilt was found to be positively correlated with the rCGM of bilateral basal ganglia regions responsible for the control of motor function of the head. CONCLUSIONS: Our data gave further insights into subfunctions within the complex cortical network involved in the processing of visual-vestibular interaction during CV. Specific areas of this cortical network could be attributed to the ventral stream (“what” pathway) responsible for the duration after stimulus stop and to the dorsal stream (“where/how” pathway) responsible for intensity aspects. BioMed Central 2012-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3467181/ /pubmed/22800430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-13-81 Text en Copyright ©2012 Becker-Bense et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Becker-Bense, Sandra
Buchholz, Hans-Georg
zu Eulenburg, Peter
Best, Christoph
Bartenstein, Peter
Schreckenberger, Matthias
Dieterich, Marianne
Ventral and dorsal streams processing visual motion perception (FDG-PET study)
title Ventral and dorsal streams processing visual motion perception (FDG-PET study)
title_full Ventral and dorsal streams processing visual motion perception (FDG-PET study)
title_fullStr Ventral and dorsal streams processing visual motion perception (FDG-PET study)
title_full_unstemmed Ventral and dorsal streams processing visual motion perception (FDG-PET study)
title_short Ventral and dorsal streams processing visual motion perception (FDG-PET study)
title_sort ventral and dorsal streams processing visual motion perception (fdg-pet study)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3467181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22800430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-13-81
work_keys_str_mv AT beckerbensesandra ventralanddorsalstreamsprocessingvisualmotionperceptionfdgpetstudy
AT buchholzhansgeorg ventralanddorsalstreamsprocessingvisualmotionperceptionfdgpetstudy
AT zueulenburgpeter ventralanddorsalstreamsprocessingvisualmotionperceptionfdgpetstudy
AT bestchristoph ventralanddorsalstreamsprocessingvisualmotionperceptionfdgpetstudy
AT bartensteinpeter ventralanddorsalstreamsprocessingvisualmotionperceptionfdgpetstudy
AT schreckenbergermatthias ventralanddorsalstreamsprocessingvisualmotionperceptionfdgpetstudy
AT dieterichmarianne ventralanddorsalstreamsprocessingvisualmotionperceptionfdgpetstudy