Cargando…

Review of quality assessment tools for the evaluation of pharmacoepidemiological safety studies

OBJECTIVES: Pharmacoepidemiological studies are an important hypothesis-testing tool in the evaluation of postmarketing drug safety. Despite the potential to produce robust value-added data, interpretation of findings can be hindered due to well-recognised methodological limitations of these studies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neyarapally, George A, Hammad, Tarek A, Pinheiro, Simone P, Iyasu, Solomon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3467649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23015600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001362
_version_ 1782245851580596224
author Neyarapally, George A
Hammad, Tarek A
Pinheiro, Simone P
Iyasu, Solomon
author_facet Neyarapally, George A
Hammad, Tarek A
Pinheiro, Simone P
Iyasu, Solomon
author_sort Neyarapally, George A
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Pharmacoepidemiological studies are an important hypothesis-testing tool in the evaluation of postmarketing drug safety. Despite the potential to produce robust value-added data, interpretation of findings can be hindered due to well-recognised methodological limitations of these studies. Therefore, assessment of their quality is essential to evaluating their credibility. The objective of this review was to evaluate the suitability and relevance of available tools for the assessment of pharmacoepidemiological safety studies. DESIGN: We created an a priori assessment framework consisting of reporting elements (REs) and quality assessment attributes (QAAs). A comprehensive literature search identified distinct assessment tools and the prespecified elements and attributes were evaluated. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the percentage representation of each domain, RE and QAA for the quality assessment tools. RESULTS: A total of 61 tools were reviewed. Most tools were not designed to evaluate pharmacoepidemiological safety studies. More than 50% of the reviewed tools considered REs under the research aims, analytical approach, outcome definition and ascertainment, study population and exposure definition and ascertainment domains. REs under the discussion and interpretation, results and study team domains were considered in less than 40% of the tools. Except for the data source domain, quality attributes were considered in less than 50% of the tools. CONCLUSIONS: Many tools failed to include critical assessment elements relevant to observational pharmacoepidemiological safety studies and did not distinguish between REs and QAAs. Further, there is a lack of considerations on the relative weights of different domains and elements. The development of a quality assessment tool would facilitate consistent, objective and evidence-based assessments of pharmacoepidemiological safety studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3467649
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34676492012-10-19 Review of quality assessment tools for the evaluation of pharmacoepidemiological safety studies Neyarapally, George A Hammad, Tarek A Pinheiro, Simone P Iyasu, Solomon BMJ Open Epidemiology OBJECTIVES: Pharmacoepidemiological studies are an important hypothesis-testing tool in the evaluation of postmarketing drug safety. Despite the potential to produce robust value-added data, interpretation of findings can be hindered due to well-recognised methodological limitations of these studies. Therefore, assessment of their quality is essential to evaluating their credibility. The objective of this review was to evaluate the suitability and relevance of available tools for the assessment of pharmacoepidemiological safety studies. DESIGN: We created an a priori assessment framework consisting of reporting elements (REs) and quality assessment attributes (QAAs). A comprehensive literature search identified distinct assessment tools and the prespecified elements and attributes were evaluated. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the percentage representation of each domain, RE and QAA for the quality assessment tools. RESULTS: A total of 61 tools were reviewed. Most tools were not designed to evaluate pharmacoepidemiological safety studies. More than 50% of the reviewed tools considered REs under the research aims, analytical approach, outcome definition and ascertainment, study population and exposure definition and ascertainment domains. REs under the discussion and interpretation, results and study team domains were considered in less than 40% of the tools. Except for the data source domain, quality attributes were considered in less than 50% of the tools. CONCLUSIONS: Many tools failed to include critical assessment elements relevant to observational pharmacoepidemiological safety studies and did not distinguish between REs and QAAs. Further, there is a lack of considerations on the relative weights of different domains and elements. The development of a quality assessment tool would facilitate consistent, objective and evidence-based assessments of pharmacoepidemiological safety studies. BMJ Group 2012-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3467649/ /pubmed/23015600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001362 Text en © 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Neyarapally, George A
Hammad, Tarek A
Pinheiro, Simone P
Iyasu, Solomon
Review of quality assessment tools for the evaluation of pharmacoepidemiological safety studies
title Review of quality assessment tools for the evaluation of pharmacoepidemiological safety studies
title_full Review of quality assessment tools for the evaluation of pharmacoepidemiological safety studies
title_fullStr Review of quality assessment tools for the evaluation of pharmacoepidemiological safety studies
title_full_unstemmed Review of quality assessment tools for the evaluation of pharmacoepidemiological safety studies
title_short Review of quality assessment tools for the evaluation of pharmacoepidemiological safety studies
title_sort review of quality assessment tools for the evaluation of pharmacoepidemiological safety studies
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3467649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23015600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001362
work_keys_str_mv AT neyarapallygeorgea reviewofqualityassessmenttoolsfortheevaluationofpharmacoepidemiologicalsafetystudies
AT hammadtareka reviewofqualityassessmenttoolsfortheevaluationofpharmacoepidemiologicalsafetystudies
AT pinheirosimonep reviewofqualityassessmenttoolsfortheevaluationofpharmacoepidemiologicalsafetystudies
AT iyasusolomon reviewofqualityassessmenttoolsfortheevaluationofpharmacoepidemiologicalsafetystudies