Cargando…

Effects of nicotine mouth spray on urges to smoke, a randomised clinical trial

OBJECTIVE: A new nicotine mouth spray was shown to be an effective stop-smoking treatment. This study was set up to examine the speed with which it relieves urges to smoke, and how it compares with nicotine lozenge in this respect. DESIGN: Randomised, cross-over trial that compared nicotine mouth sp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hansson, Anna, Hajek, Peter, Perfekt, Roland, Kraiczi, Holger
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3467658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23015605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001618
_version_ 1782245853703962624
author Hansson, Anna
Hajek, Peter
Perfekt, Roland
Kraiczi, Holger
author_facet Hansson, Anna
Hajek, Peter
Perfekt, Roland
Kraiczi, Holger
author_sort Hansson, Anna
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: A new nicotine mouth spray was shown to be an effective stop-smoking treatment. This study was set up to examine the speed with which it relieves urges to smoke, and how it compares with nicotine lozenge in this respect. DESIGN: Randomised, cross-over trial that compared nicotine mouth spray 2 mg versus nicotine lozenge 2 or 4 mg. SETTING: Clinical pharmacology research unit. PARTICIPANTS: 200 Volunteer smokers who smoked their first cigarette of the day within 30 min of waking. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects abstained from smoking the night before the morning they attended the laboratory. Treatment was administered following 5 h of witnessed abstinence. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Urge to smoke was rated before and at 1, 3, 5, 10, 15, 25, 30, 45 min and 1, 1.5, and 2 h after treatment administration. The primary outcome concerned change during the first 1, 3 and 5 min after treatment administration. RESULTS: Nicotine mouth spray achieved greater reductions in craving than either lozenge during the first 1, 3 and 5 min postadministration. After using mouth spray, half of the users experienced 50% reduction in craving within 3.40 min, while the same treatment effect was achieved within 9.92 and 9.20 min for the 2 and 4 mg lozenge, respectively. Adverse events with both mouth spray and lozenge were mostly mild. Hiccups, local irritation, nausea and dyspepsia were more frequent with spray than lozenge. CONCLUSIONS: Nicotine mouth spray provides a faster relief of cravings than nicotine lozenge.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3467658
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34676582012-10-19 Effects of nicotine mouth spray on urges to smoke, a randomised clinical trial Hansson, Anna Hajek, Peter Perfekt, Roland Kraiczi, Holger BMJ Open Pharmacology and Therapeutics OBJECTIVE: A new nicotine mouth spray was shown to be an effective stop-smoking treatment. This study was set up to examine the speed with which it relieves urges to smoke, and how it compares with nicotine lozenge in this respect. DESIGN: Randomised, cross-over trial that compared nicotine mouth spray 2 mg versus nicotine lozenge 2 or 4 mg. SETTING: Clinical pharmacology research unit. PARTICIPANTS: 200 Volunteer smokers who smoked their first cigarette of the day within 30 min of waking. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects abstained from smoking the night before the morning they attended the laboratory. Treatment was administered following 5 h of witnessed abstinence. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Urge to smoke was rated before and at 1, 3, 5, 10, 15, 25, 30, 45 min and 1, 1.5, and 2 h after treatment administration. The primary outcome concerned change during the first 1, 3 and 5 min after treatment administration. RESULTS: Nicotine mouth spray achieved greater reductions in craving than either lozenge during the first 1, 3 and 5 min postadministration. After using mouth spray, half of the users experienced 50% reduction in craving within 3.40 min, while the same treatment effect was achieved within 9.92 and 9.20 min for the 2 and 4 mg lozenge, respectively. Adverse events with both mouth spray and lozenge were mostly mild. Hiccups, local irritation, nausea and dyspepsia were more frequent with spray than lozenge. CONCLUSIONS: Nicotine mouth spray provides a faster relief of cravings than nicotine lozenge. BMJ Group 2012-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3467658/ /pubmed/23015605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001618 Text en © 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Hansson, Anna
Hajek, Peter
Perfekt, Roland
Kraiczi, Holger
Effects of nicotine mouth spray on urges to smoke, a randomised clinical trial
title Effects of nicotine mouth spray on urges to smoke, a randomised clinical trial
title_full Effects of nicotine mouth spray on urges to smoke, a randomised clinical trial
title_fullStr Effects of nicotine mouth spray on urges to smoke, a randomised clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Effects of nicotine mouth spray on urges to smoke, a randomised clinical trial
title_short Effects of nicotine mouth spray on urges to smoke, a randomised clinical trial
title_sort effects of nicotine mouth spray on urges to smoke, a randomised clinical trial
topic Pharmacology and Therapeutics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3467658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23015605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001618
work_keys_str_mv AT hanssonanna effectsofnicotinemouthsprayonurgestosmokearandomisedclinicaltrial
AT hajekpeter effectsofnicotinemouthsprayonurgestosmokearandomisedclinicaltrial
AT perfektroland effectsofnicotinemouthsprayonurgestosmokearandomisedclinicaltrial
AT kraicziholger effectsofnicotinemouthsprayonurgestosmokearandomisedclinicaltrial