Cargando…

Elective neck dissection versus “wait and watch” policy in tongue carcinoma

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of elective neck dissection versus the “wait and watch” policy in the treatment of early squamous cell carcinoma of tongue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 21 patients with surgical treatment between April 2009 and July 2011. The patients were di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pugazhendi, Satish Kumaran, Thambiah, Lalitha, Venkatasetty, Anuradha, Thangaswamy, Vinod
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3467864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23066257
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.100212
_version_ 1782245887515295744
author Pugazhendi, Satish Kumaran
Thambiah, Lalitha
Venkatasetty, Anuradha
Thangaswamy, Vinod
author_facet Pugazhendi, Satish Kumaran
Thambiah, Lalitha
Venkatasetty, Anuradha
Thangaswamy, Vinod
author_sort Pugazhendi, Satish Kumaran
collection PubMed
description AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of elective neck dissection versus the “wait and watch” policy in the treatment of early squamous cell carcinoma of tongue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 21 patients with surgical treatment between April 2009 and July 2011. The patients were divided into two groups, with Group 1 consisting of patients who underwent wide excision glossectomy with elective neck dissection and Group 2 consisting of patients who underwent glossectomy without the neck being surgically addressed. The selection of patients was done by the random double-blinded method and the review was done by a single reviewer. All patients were examined for an average period of 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: Twenty-one cases were treated, among which there were 17 T1 and 4 T2 carcinomas. All the patients had primary carcinoma involving only the tongue with no clinical neck palpable neck nodes. Eleven patients underwent wide excision of primary tumor with elective neck dissection (Group 1) and 10 patients underwent only resection of primary tumor without the neck being surgically addressed (Group 2). In Group 1, there were no recurrences, and in Group 2, there were two patients who developed subsequent cervical node metastasis with one patient undergoing further surgery to address the positive neck and the other patient was lost to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Regional recurrence was the most common cause of failure after surgical treatment of oral tongue carcinoma. Elective neck dissection significantly reduced mortality due to regional recurrence and also increased the overall survival. Our study suggests that elective neck dissection is a treatment strategy of choice for stages I and II carcinoma of the oral tongue. A prospective, randomized study is worthwhile to further evaluate the benefit of elective neck dissection in the treatment of early carcinoma of the tongue with a larger pool of patients and a lengthier follow-up period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3467864
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34678642012-10-12 Elective neck dissection versus “wait and watch” policy in tongue carcinoma Pugazhendi, Satish Kumaran Thambiah, Lalitha Venkatasetty, Anuradha Thangaswamy, Vinod J Pharm Bioallied Sci Dental Science - Original Article AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of elective neck dissection versus the “wait and watch” policy in the treatment of early squamous cell carcinoma of tongue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 21 patients with surgical treatment between April 2009 and July 2011. The patients were divided into two groups, with Group 1 consisting of patients who underwent wide excision glossectomy with elective neck dissection and Group 2 consisting of patients who underwent glossectomy without the neck being surgically addressed. The selection of patients was done by the random double-blinded method and the review was done by a single reviewer. All patients were examined for an average period of 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: Twenty-one cases were treated, among which there were 17 T1 and 4 T2 carcinomas. All the patients had primary carcinoma involving only the tongue with no clinical neck palpable neck nodes. Eleven patients underwent wide excision of primary tumor with elective neck dissection (Group 1) and 10 patients underwent only resection of primary tumor without the neck being surgically addressed (Group 2). In Group 1, there were no recurrences, and in Group 2, there were two patients who developed subsequent cervical node metastasis with one patient undergoing further surgery to address the positive neck and the other patient was lost to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Regional recurrence was the most common cause of failure after surgical treatment of oral tongue carcinoma. Elective neck dissection significantly reduced mortality due to regional recurrence and also increased the overall survival. Our study suggests that elective neck dissection is a treatment strategy of choice for stages I and II carcinoma of the oral tongue. A prospective, randomized study is worthwhile to further evaluate the benefit of elective neck dissection in the treatment of early carcinoma of the tongue with a larger pool of patients and a lengthier follow-up period. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3467864/ /pubmed/23066257 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.100212 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Dental Science - Original Article
Pugazhendi, Satish Kumaran
Thambiah, Lalitha
Venkatasetty, Anuradha
Thangaswamy, Vinod
Elective neck dissection versus “wait and watch” policy in tongue carcinoma
title Elective neck dissection versus “wait and watch” policy in tongue carcinoma
title_full Elective neck dissection versus “wait and watch” policy in tongue carcinoma
title_fullStr Elective neck dissection versus “wait and watch” policy in tongue carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Elective neck dissection versus “wait and watch” policy in tongue carcinoma
title_short Elective neck dissection versus “wait and watch” policy in tongue carcinoma
title_sort elective neck dissection versus “wait and watch” policy in tongue carcinoma
topic Dental Science - Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3467864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23066257
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.100212
work_keys_str_mv AT pugazhendisatishkumaran electiveneckdissectionversuswaitandwatchpolicyintonguecarcinoma
AT thambiahlalitha electiveneckdissectionversuswaitandwatchpolicyintonguecarcinoma
AT venkatasettyanuradha electiveneckdissectionversuswaitandwatchpolicyintonguecarcinoma
AT thangaswamyvinod electiveneckdissectionversuswaitandwatchpolicyintonguecarcinoma