Cargando…

Sampling issues in quantitative analysis of dendritic spines morphology

BACKGROUND: Quantitative analysis of changes in dendritic spine morphology has become an interesting issue in contemporary neuroscience. However, the diversity in dendritic spine population might seriously influence the result of measurements in which their morphology is studied. The detection of di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruszczycki, Błażej, Szepesi, Zsuzsanna, Wilczynski, Grzegorz M, Bijata, Monika, Kalita, Katarzyna, Kaczmarek, Leszek, Wlodarczyk, Jakub
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3468369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22920322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-213
_version_ 1782245937511399424
author Ruszczycki, Błażej
Szepesi, Zsuzsanna
Wilczynski, Grzegorz M
Bijata, Monika
Kalita, Katarzyna
Kaczmarek, Leszek
Wlodarczyk, Jakub
author_facet Ruszczycki, Błażej
Szepesi, Zsuzsanna
Wilczynski, Grzegorz M
Bijata, Monika
Kalita, Katarzyna
Kaczmarek, Leszek
Wlodarczyk, Jakub
author_sort Ruszczycki, Błażej
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Quantitative analysis of changes in dendritic spine morphology has become an interesting issue in contemporary neuroscience. However, the diversity in dendritic spine population might seriously influence the result of measurements in which their morphology is studied. The detection of differences in spine morphology between control and test group is often compromised by the number of dendritic spines taken for analysis. In order to estimate the impact of dendritic spine diversity we performed Monte Carlo simulations examining various experimental setups and statistical approaches. The confocal images of dendritic spines from hippocampal dissociated cultures have been used to create a set of variables exploited as the simulation resources. RESULTS: The tabulated results of simulations given in this article, provide the number of dendritic spines required for the detection of hidden morphological differences between control and test groups in terms of spine head-width, length and area. It turns out that this is the head-width among these three variables, where the changes are most easily detected. Simulation of changes occurring in a subpopulation of spines reveal the strong dependence of detectability on the statistical approach applied. The analysis based on comparison of percentage of spines in subclasses is less sensitive than the direct comparison of relevant variables describing spines morphology. CONCLUSIONS: We evaluated the sampling aspect and effect of systematic morphological variation on detecting the differences in spine morphology. The results provided here may serve as a guideline in selecting the number of samples to be studied in a planned experiment. Our simulations might be a step towards the development of a standardized method of quantitative comparison of dendritic spines morphology, in which different sources of errors are considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3468369
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34683692012-10-11 Sampling issues in quantitative analysis of dendritic spines morphology Ruszczycki, Błażej Szepesi, Zsuzsanna Wilczynski, Grzegorz M Bijata, Monika Kalita, Katarzyna Kaczmarek, Leszek Wlodarczyk, Jakub BMC Bioinformatics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Quantitative analysis of changes in dendritic spine morphology has become an interesting issue in contemporary neuroscience. However, the diversity in dendritic spine population might seriously influence the result of measurements in which their morphology is studied. The detection of differences in spine morphology between control and test group is often compromised by the number of dendritic spines taken for analysis. In order to estimate the impact of dendritic spine diversity we performed Monte Carlo simulations examining various experimental setups and statistical approaches. The confocal images of dendritic spines from hippocampal dissociated cultures have been used to create a set of variables exploited as the simulation resources. RESULTS: The tabulated results of simulations given in this article, provide the number of dendritic spines required for the detection of hidden morphological differences between control and test groups in terms of spine head-width, length and area. It turns out that this is the head-width among these three variables, where the changes are most easily detected. Simulation of changes occurring in a subpopulation of spines reveal the strong dependence of detectability on the statistical approach applied. The analysis based on comparison of percentage of spines in subclasses is less sensitive than the direct comparison of relevant variables describing spines morphology. CONCLUSIONS: We evaluated the sampling aspect and effect of systematic morphological variation on detecting the differences in spine morphology. The results provided here may serve as a guideline in selecting the number of samples to be studied in a planned experiment. Our simulations might be a step towards the development of a standardized method of quantitative comparison of dendritic spines morphology, in which different sources of errors are considered. BioMed Central 2012-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3468369/ /pubmed/22920322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-213 Text en Copyright ©2012 Ruszczycki et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Ruszczycki, Błażej
Szepesi, Zsuzsanna
Wilczynski, Grzegorz M
Bijata, Monika
Kalita, Katarzyna
Kaczmarek, Leszek
Wlodarczyk, Jakub
Sampling issues in quantitative analysis of dendritic spines morphology
title Sampling issues in quantitative analysis of dendritic spines morphology
title_full Sampling issues in quantitative analysis of dendritic spines morphology
title_fullStr Sampling issues in quantitative analysis of dendritic spines morphology
title_full_unstemmed Sampling issues in quantitative analysis of dendritic spines morphology
title_short Sampling issues in quantitative analysis of dendritic spines morphology
title_sort sampling issues in quantitative analysis of dendritic spines morphology
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3468369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22920322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-213
work_keys_str_mv AT ruszczyckibłazej samplingissuesinquantitativeanalysisofdendriticspinesmorphology
AT szepesizsuzsanna samplingissuesinquantitativeanalysisofdendriticspinesmorphology
AT wilczynskigrzegorzm samplingissuesinquantitativeanalysisofdendriticspinesmorphology
AT bijatamonika samplingissuesinquantitativeanalysisofdendriticspinesmorphology
AT kalitakatarzyna samplingissuesinquantitativeanalysisofdendriticspinesmorphology
AT kaczmarekleszek samplingissuesinquantitativeanalysisofdendriticspinesmorphology
AT wlodarczykjakub samplingissuesinquantitativeanalysisofdendriticspinesmorphology