Cargando…
Modeling Drosophila Positional Preferences in Open Field Arenas with Directional Persistence and Wall Attraction
In open field arenas, Drosophila adults exhibit a preference for arena boundaries over internal walls and open regions. Herein, we investigate the nature of this preference using phenomenological modeling of locomotion to determine whether local arena features and constraints on movement alone are s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3468593/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23071591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046570 |
_version_ | 1782245967019376640 |
---|---|
author | Soibam, Benjamin Goldfeder, Rachel L. Manson-Bishop, Claire Gamblin, Rachel Pletcher, Scott D. Shah, Shishir Gunaratne, Gemunu H. Roman, Gregg W. |
author_facet | Soibam, Benjamin Goldfeder, Rachel L. Manson-Bishop, Claire Gamblin, Rachel Pletcher, Scott D. Shah, Shishir Gunaratne, Gemunu H. Roman, Gregg W. |
author_sort | Soibam, Benjamin |
collection | PubMed |
description | In open field arenas, Drosophila adults exhibit a preference for arena boundaries over internal walls and open regions. Herein, we investigate the nature of this preference using phenomenological modeling of locomotion to determine whether local arena features and constraints on movement alone are sufficient to drive positional preferences within open field arenas of different shapes and with different internal features. Our model has two components: directional persistence and local wall force. In regions far away from walls, the trajectory is entirely characterized by a directional persistence probability, [Image: see text], for each movement defined by the step size, [Image: see text], and the turn angle, [Image: see text]. In close proximity to walls, motion is computed from [Image: see text] and a local attractive force which depends on the distance between the fly and points on the walls. The directional persistence probability was obtained experimentally from trajectories of wild type Drosophila in a circular open field arena and the wall force was computed to minimize the difference between the radial distributions from the model and Drosophila in the same circular arena. The two-component model for fly movement was challenged by comparing the positional preferences from the two-component model to wild type Drosophila in a variety of open field arenas. In most arenas there was a strong concordance between the two-component model and Drosophila. In more complex arenas, the model exhibits similar trends, but some significant differences were found. These differences suggest that there are emergent features within these complex arenas that have significance for the fly, such as potential shelter. Hence, the two-component model is an important step in defining how Drosophila interact with their environment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3468593 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34685932012-10-15 Modeling Drosophila Positional Preferences in Open Field Arenas with Directional Persistence and Wall Attraction Soibam, Benjamin Goldfeder, Rachel L. Manson-Bishop, Claire Gamblin, Rachel Pletcher, Scott D. Shah, Shishir Gunaratne, Gemunu H. Roman, Gregg W. PLoS One Research Article In open field arenas, Drosophila adults exhibit a preference for arena boundaries over internal walls and open regions. Herein, we investigate the nature of this preference using phenomenological modeling of locomotion to determine whether local arena features and constraints on movement alone are sufficient to drive positional preferences within open field arenas of different shapes and with different internal features. Our model has two components: directional persistence and local wall force. In regions far away from walls, the trajectory is entirely characterized by a directional persistence probability, [Image: see text], for each movement defined by the step size, [Image: see text], and the turn angle, [Image: see text]. In close proximity to walls, motion is computed from [Image: see text] and a local attractive force which depends on the distance between the fly and points on the walls. The directional persistence probability was obtained experimentally from trajectories of wild type Drosophila in a circular open field arena and the wall force was computed to minimize the difference between the radial distributions from the model and Drosophila in the same circular arena. The two-component model for fly movement was challenged by comparing the positional preferences from the two-component model to wild type Drosophila in a variety of open field arenas. In most arenas there was a strong concordance between the two-component model and Drosophila. In more complex arenas, the model exhibits similar trends, but some significant differences were found. These differences suggest that there are emergent features within these complex arenas that have significance for the fly, such as potential shelter. Hence, the two-component model is an important step in defining how Drosophila interact with their environment. Public Library of Science 2012-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3468593/ /pubmed/23071591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046570 Text en © 2012 Soibam et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Soibam, Benjamin Goldfeder, Rachel L. Manson-Bishop, Claire Gamblin, Rachel Pletcher, Scott D. Shah, Shishir Gunaratne, Gemunu H. Roman, Gregg W. Modeling Drosophila Positional Preferences in Open Field Arenas with Directional Persistence and Wall Attraction |
title | Modeling Drosophila Positional Preferences in Open Field Arenas with Directional Persistence and Wall Attraction |
title_full | Modeling Drosophila Positional Preferences in Open Field Arenas with Directional Persistence and Wall Attraction |
title_fullStr | Modeling Drosophila Positional Preferences in Open Field Arenas with Directional Persistence and Wall Attraction |
title_full_unstemmed | Modeling Drosophila Positional Preferences in Open Field Arenas with Directional Persistence and Wall Attraction |
title_short | Modeling Drosophila Positional Preferences in Open Field Arenas with Directional Persistence and Wall Attraction |
title_sort | modeling drosophila positional preferences in open field arenas with directional persistence and wall attraction |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3468593/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23071591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046570 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT soibambenjamin modelingdrosophilapositionalpreferencesinopenfieldarenaswithdirectionalpersistenceandwallattraction AT goldfederrachell modelingdrosophilapositionalpreferencesinopenfieldarenaswithdirectionalpersistenceandwallattraction AT mansonbishopclaire modelingdrosophilapositionalpreferencesinopenfieldarenaswithdirectionalpersistenceandwallattraction AT gamblinrachel modelingdrosophilapositionalpreferencesinopenfieldarenaswithdirectionalpersistenceandwallattraction AT pletcherscottd modelingdrosophilapositionalpreferencesinopenfieldarenaswithdirectionalpersistenceandwallattraction AT shahshishir modelingdrosophilapositionalpreferencesinopenfieldarenaswithdirectionalpersistenceandwallattraction AT gunaratnegemunuh modelingdrosophilapositionalpreferencesinopenfieldarenaswithdirectionalpersistenceandwallattraction AT romangreggw modelingdrosophilapositionalpreferencesinopenfieldarenaswithdirectionalpersistenceandwallattraction |