Cargando…

Enhancing Communication about Paediatric Medicines: Lessons from a Qualitative Study of Parents' Experiences of Their Child's Suspected Adverse Drug Reaction

BACKGROUND: There is little research on parents' experiences of suspected adverse drug reactions in their children and hence little evidence to guide clinicians when communicating with families about problems associated with medicines. OBJECTIVE: To identify any unmet information and communicat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arnott, Janine, Hesselgreaves, Hannah, Nunn, Anthony J., Peak, Matthew, Pirmohamed, Munir, Smyth, Rosalind L., Turner, Mark A., Young, Bridget
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3468607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23071535
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046022
_version_ 1782245970295128064
author Arnott, Janine
Hesselgreaves, Hannah
Nunn, Anthony J.
Peak, Matthew
Pirmohamed, Munir
Smyth, Rosalind L.
Turner, Mark A.
Young, Bridget
author_facet Arnott, Janine
Hesselgreaves, Hannah
Nunn, Anthony J.
Peak, Matthew
Pirmohamed, Munir
Smyth, Rosalind L.
Turner, Mark A.
Young, Bridget
author_sort Arnott, Janine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is little research on parents' experiences of suspected adverse drug reactions in their children and hence little evidence to guide clinicians when communicating with families about problems associated with medicines. OBJECTIVE: To identify any unmet information and communication needs described by parents whose child had a suspected adverse drug reaction. METHODS: Semi-structured qualitative interviews with parents of 44 children who had a suspected adverse drug reaction identified on hospital admission, during in-patient treatment or reported by parents using the Yellow Card Scheme (the UK system for collecting spontaneous reports of adverse drug reactions). Interviews were conducted face-to-face or by telephone; most interviews were audiorecorded and transcribed. Analysis was informed by the principles of the constant comparative method. RESULTS: Many parents described being dissatisfied with how clinicians communicated about adverse drug reactions and unclear about the implications for their child's future use of medicines. A few parents felt that clinicians had abandoned their child and reported refusing the use of further medicines because they feared a repeated adverse drug reaction. The accounts of parents of children with cancer were different. They emphasised their confidence in clinicians' management of adverse drug reactions and described how clinicians prospectively explained the risks associated with medicines. Parents linked symptoms to medicines in ways that resembled the established reasoning that clinicians use to evaluate the possibility that a medicine has caused an adverse drug reaction. CONCLUSION: Clinicians' communication about adverse drug reactions was poor from the perspective of parents, indicating that improvements are needed. The accounts of parents of children with cancer indicate that prospective explanation about adverse drug reactions at the time of prescription can be effective. Convergence between parents and clinicians in their reasoning for linking children's symptoms to medicines could be a starting point for improved communication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3468607
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34686072012-10-15 Enhancing Communication about Paediatric Medicines: Lessons from a Qualitative Study of Parents' Experiences of Their Child's Suspected Adverse Drug Reaction Arnott, Janine Hesselgreaves, Hannah Nunn, Anthony J. Peak, Matthew Pirmohamed, Munir Smyth, Rosalind L. Turner, Mark A. Young, Bridget PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: There is little research on parents' experiences of suspected adverse drug reactions in their children and hence little evidence to guide clinicians when communicating with families about problems associated with medicines. OBJECTIVE: To identify any unmet information and communication needs described by parents whose child had a suspected adverse drug reaction. METHODS: Semi-structured qualitative interviews with parents of 44 children who had a suspected adverse drug reaction identified on hospital admission, during in-patient treatment or reported by parents using the Yellow Card Scheme (the UK system for collecting spontaneous reports of adverse drug reactions). Interviews were conducted face-to-face or by telephone; most interviews were audiorecorded and transcribed. Analysis was informed by the principles of the constant comparative method. RESULTS: Many parents described being dissatisfied with how clinicians communicated about adverse drug reactions and unclear about the implications for their child's future use of medicines. A few parents felt that clinicians had abandoned their child and reported refusing the use of further medicines because they feared a repeated adverse drug reaction. The accounts of parents of children with cancer were different. They emphasised their confidence in clinicians' management of adverse drug reactions and described how clinicians prospectively explained the risks associated with medicines. Parents linked symptoms to medicines in ways that resembled the established reasoning that clinicians use to evaluate the possibility that a medicine has caused an adverse drug reaction. CONCLUSION: Clinicians' communication about adverse drug reactions was poor from the perspective of parents, indicating that improvements are needed. The accounts of parents of children with cancer indicate that prospective explanation about adverse drug reactions at the time of prescription can be effective. Convergence between parents and clinicians in their reasoning for linking children's symptoms to medicines could be a starting point for improved communication. Public Library of Science 2012-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3468607/ /pubmed/23071535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046022 Text en © 2012 Arnott et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Arnott, Janine
Hesselgreaves, Hannah
Nunn, Anthony J.
Peak, Matthew
Pirmohamed, Munir
Smyth, Rosalind L.
Turner, Mark A.
Young, Bridget
Enhancing Communication about Paediatric Medicines: Lessons from a Qualitative Study of Parents' Experiences of Their Child's Suspected Adverse Drug Reaction
title Enhancing Communication about Paediatric Medicines: Lessons from a Qualitative Study of Parents' Experiences of Their Child's Suspected Adverse Drug Reaction
title_full Enhancing Communication about Paediatric Medicines: Lessons from a Qualitative Study of Parents' Experiences of Their Child's Suspected Adverse Drug Reaction
title_fullStr Enhancing Communication about Paediatric Medicines: Lessons from a Qualitative Study of Parents' Experiences of Their Child's Suspected Adverse Drug Reaction
title_full_unstemmed Enhancing Communication about Paediatric Medicines: Lessons from a Qualitative Study of Parents' Experiences of Their Child's Suspected Adverse Drug Reaction
title_short Enhancing Communication about Paediatric Medicines: Lessons from a Qualitative Study of Parents' Experiences of Their Child's Suspected Adverse Drug Reaction
title_sort enhancing communication about paediatric medicines: lessons from a qualitative study of parents' experiences of their child's suspected adverse drug reaction
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3468607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23071535
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046022
work_keys_str_mv AT arnottjanine enhancingcommunicationaboutpaediatricmedicineslessonsfromaqualitativestudyofparentsexperiencesoftheirchildssuspectedadversedrugreaction
AT hesselgreaveshannah enhancingcommunicationaboutpaediatricmedicineslessonsfromaqualitativestudyofparentsexperiencesoftheirchildssuspectedadversedrugreaction
AT nunnanthonyj enhancingcommunicationaboutpaediatricmedicineslessonsfromaqualitativestudyofparentsexperiencesoftheirchildssuspectedadversedrugreaction
AT peakmatthew enhancingcommunicationaboutpaediatricmedicineslessonsfromaqualitativestudyofparentsexperiencesoftheirchildssuspectedadversedrugreaction
AT pirmohamedmunir enhancingcommunicationaboutpaediatricmedicineslessonsfromaqualitativestudyofparentsexperiencesoftheirchildssuspectedadversedrugreaction
AT smythrosalindl enhancingcommunicationaboutpaediatricmedicineslessonsfromaqualitativestudyofparentsexperiencesoftheirchildssuspectedadversedrugreaction
AT turnermarka enhancingcommunicationaboutpaediatricmedicineslessonsfromaqualitativestudyofparentsexperiencesoftheirchildssuspectedadversedrugreaction
AT youngbridget enhancingcommunicationaboutpaediatricmedicineslessonsfromaqualitativestudyofparentsexperiencesoftheirchildssuspectedadversedrugreaction