Cargando…

Pain and stress assessment after retinopathy of prematurity screening examination: Indirect ophthalmoscopy versus digital retinal imaging

BACKGROUND: Increasingly, neonatal clinics seek to minimize painful experiences and stress for premature infants. Fundoscopy performed with a binocular indirect ophthalmoscope is the reference examination technique for screening of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), and it is associated with pain and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moral-Pumarega, M Teresa, Caserío-Carbonero, Sonia, De-La-Cruz-Bértolo, Javier, Tejada-Palacios, Pilar, Lora-Pablos, David, Pallás-Alonso, Carmen R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3469398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22928523
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-12-132
_version_ 1782246076926918656
author Moral-Pumarega, M Teresa
Caserío-Carbonero, Sonia
De-La-Cruz-Bértolo, Javier
Tejada-Palacios, Pilar
Lora-Pablos, David
Pallás-Alonso, Carmen R
author_facet Moral-Pumarega, M Teresa
Caserío-Carbonero, Sonia
De-La-Cruz-Bértolo, Javier
Tejada-Palacios, Pilar
Lora-Pablos, David
Pallás-Alonso, Carmen R
author_sort Moral-Pumarega, M Teresa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Increasingly, neonatal clinics seek to minimize painful experiences and stress for premature infants. Fundoscopy performed with a binocular indirect ophthalmoscope is the reference examination technique for screening of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), and it is associated with pain and stress. Wide-field digital retinal imaging is a recent technique that should be evaluated for minimizing infant pain and stress. METHODS: The purpose of the study was to assess and compare the impact of using a binocular indirect ophthalmoscope (BIO), or wide-field digital retinal imaging (WFDRI) on pain and stress in infants undergoing ROP screening examination. This was a comparative evaluation study of two screening procedures. Ophthalmologic examinations (N = 70) were performed on 24 infants with both BIO and WFDRI. Pain assessments were performed with two specific neonatal scales (Crying, requires oxygen, increased vital signs, expression and sleeplessness, CRIES and, Premature infant pain profile, PIPP) just prior to the examination, and 30 seconds, 1 hour, and 24 hours later after ending the examination. RESULTS: Changes over time were significantly different between BIO and WFDRI with both scales (PIPP score, p = .007, and CRIES score, p = .001). Median PIPP score (interquartile interval) at baseline was 4 (3–5). At 30 seconds the score was 8 (6–9) for BIO and 6 (5–7) for WFDRI, respectively. The increase in PIPP score between baseline and 30 seconds was significantly lower with WFDRI (p = .006). The median increase in CRIES score from baseline to 30 seconds was 1 point lower for WFDRI than for BIO (p < .001). No significant difference in response remained at 1 hour or 24 hour assessments. CONCLUSIONS: A transient short-term pain and stress response occurs with both BIO and WFDRI. Infants examined for screening of ROP with digital retinal imaging present less pain and stress at 30 seconds following completion of the exam when compared with binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3469398
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34693982012-10-12 Pain and stress assessment after retinopathy of prematurity screening examination: Indirect ophthalmoscopy versus digital retinal imaging Moral-Pumarega, M Teresa Caserío-Carbonero, Sonia De-La-Cruz-Bértolo, Javier Tejada-Palacios, Pilar Lora-Pablos, David Pallás-Alonso, Carmen R BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Increasingly, neonatal clinics seek to minimize painful experiences and stress for premature infants. Fundoscopy performed with a binocular indirect ophthalmoscope is the reference examination technique for screening of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), and it is associated with pain and stress. Wide-field digital retinal imaging is a recent technique that should be evaluated for minimizing infant pain and stress. METHODS: The purpose of the study was to assess and compare the impact of using a binocular indirect ophthalmoscope (BIO), or wide-field digital retinal imaging (WFDRI) on pain and stress in infants undergoing ROP screening examination. This was a comparative evaluation study of two screening procedures. Ophthalmologic examinations (N = 70) were performed on 24 infants with both BIO and WFDRI. Pain assessments were performed with two specific neonatal scales (Crying, requires oxygen, increased vital signs, expression and sleeplessness, CRIES and, Premature infant pain profile, PIPP) just prior to the examination, and 30 seconds, 1 hour, and 24 hours later after ending the examination. RESULTS: Changes over time were significantly different between BIO and WFDRI with both scales (PIPP score, p = .007, and CRIES score, p = .001). Median PIPP score (interquartile interval) at baseline was 4 (3–5). At 30 seconds the score was 8 (6–9) for BIO and 6 (5–7) for WFDRI, respectively. The increase in PIPP score between baseline and 30 seconds was significantly lower with WFDRI (p = .006). The median increase in CRIES score from baseline to 30 seconds was 1 point lower for WFDRI than for BIO (p < .001). No significant difference in response remained at 1 hour or 24 hour assessments. CONCLUSIONS: A transient short-term pain and stress response occurs with both BIO and WFDRI. Infants examined for screening of ROP with digital retinal imaging present less pain and stress at 30 seconds following completion of the exam when compared with binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy. BioMed Central 2012-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3469398/ /pubmed/22928523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-12-132 Text en Copyright ©2012 Moral-Pumarega et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Moral-Pumarega, M Teresa
Caserío-Carbonero, Sonia
De-La-Cruz-Bértolo, Javier
Tejada-Palacios, Pilar
Lora-Pablos, David
Pallás-Alonso, Carmen R
Pain and stress assessment after retinopathy of prematurity screening examination: Indirect ophthalmoscopy versus digital retinal imaging
title Pain and stress assessment after retinopathy of prematurity screening examination: Indirect ophthalmoscopy versus digital retinal imaging
title_full Pain and stress assessment after retinopathy of prematurity screening examination: Indirect ophthalmoscopy versus digital retinal imaging
title_fullStr Pain and stress assessment after retinopathy of prematurity screening examination: Indirect ophthalmoscopy versus digital retinal imaging
title_full_unstemmed Pain and stress assessment after retinopathy of prematurity screening examination: Indirect ophthalmoscopy versus digital retinal imaging
title_short Pain and stress assessment after retinopathy of prematurity screening examination: Indirect ophthalmoscopy versus digital retinal imaging
title_sort pain and stress assessment after retinopathy of prematurity screening examination: indirect ophthalmoscopy versus digital retinal imaging
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3469398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22928523
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-12-132
work_keys_str_mv AT moralpumaregamteresa painandstressassessmentafterretinopathyofprematurityscreeningexaminationindirectophthalmoscopyversusdigitalretinalimaging
AT caseriocarbonerosonia painandstressassessmentafterretinopathyofprematurityscreeningexaminationindirectophthalmoscopyversusdigitalretinalimaging
AT delacruzbertolojavier painandstressassessmentafterretinopathyofprematurityscreeningexaminationindirectophthalmoscopyversusdigitalretinalimaging
AT tejadapalaciospilar painandstressassessmentafterretinopathyofprematurityscreeningexaminationindirectophthalmoscopyversusdigitalretinalimaging
AT lorapablosdavid painandstressassessmentafterretinopathyofprematurityscreeningexaminationindirectophthalmoscopyversusdigitalretinalimaging
AT pallasalonsocarmenr painandstressassessmentafterretinopathyofprematurityscreeningexaminationindirectophthalmoscopyversusdigitalretinalimaging