Cargando…

Review of Statistical Methods for Analysing Healthcare Resources and Costs

We review statistical methods for analysing healthcare resource use and costs, their ability to address skewness, excess zeros, multimodality and heavy right tails, and their ease for general use. We aim to provide guidance on analysing resource use and costs focusing on randomised trials, although...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mihaylova, Borislava, Briggs, Andrew, O'Hagan, Anthony, Thompson, Simon G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3470917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20799344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hec.1653
_version_ 1782246328957403136
author Mihaylova, Borislava
Briggs, Andrew
O'Hagan, Anthony
Thompson, Simon G
author_facet Mihaylova, Borislava
Briggs, Andrew
O'Hagan, Anthony
Thompson, Simon G
author_sort Mihaylova, Borislava
collection PubMed
description We review statistical methods for analysing healthcare resource use and costs, their ability to address skewness, excess zeros, multimodality and heavy right tails, and their ease for general use. We aim to provide guidance on analysing resource use and costs focusing on randomised trials, although methods often have wider applicability. Twelve broad categories of methods were identified: (I) methods based on the normal distribution, (II) methods following transformation of data, (III) single-distribution generalized linear models (GLMs), (IV) parametric models based on skewed distributions outside the GLM family, (V) models based on mixtures of parametric distributions, (VI) two (or multi)-part and Tobit models, (VII) survival methods, (VIII) non-parametric methods, (IX) methods based on truncation or trimming of data, (X) data components models, (XI) methods based on averaging across models, and (XII) Markov chain methods. Based on this review, our recommendations are that, first, simple methods are preferred in large samples where the near-normality of sample means is assured. Second, in somewhat smaller samples, relatively simple methods, able to deal with one or two of above data characteristics, may be preferable but checking sensitivity to assumptions is necessary. Finally, some more complex methods hold promise, but are relatively untried; their implementation requires substantial expertise and they are not currently recommended for wider applied work. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3470917
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34709172012-10-18 Review of Statistical Methods for Analysing Healthcare Resources and Costs Mihaylova, Borislava Briggs, Andrew O'Hagan, Anthony Thompson, Simon G Health Econ Research Articles We review statistical methods for analysing healthcare resource use and costs, their ability to address skewness, excess zeros, multimodality and heavy right tails, and their ease for general use. We aim to provide guidance on analysing resource use and costs focusing on randomised trials, although methods often have wider applicability. Twelve broad categories of methods were identified: (I) methods based on the normal distribution, (II) methods following transformation of data, (III) single-distribution generalized linear models (GLMs), (IV) parametric models based on skewed distributions outside the GLM family, (V) models based on mixtures of parametric distributions, (VI) two (or multi)-part and Tobit models, (VII) survival methods, (VIII) non-parametric methods, (IX) methods based on truncation or trimming of data, (X) data components models, (XI) methods based on averaging across models, and (XII) Markov chain methods. Based on this review, our recommendations are that, first, simple methods are preferred in large samples where the near-normality of sample means is assured. Second, in somewhat smaller samples, relatively simple methods, able to deal with one or two of above data characteristics, may be preferable but checking sensitivity to assumptions is necessary. Finally, some more complex methods hold promise, but are relatively untried; their implementation requires substantial expertise and they are not currently recommended for wider applied work. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2011-08 2010-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3470917/ /pubmed/20799344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hec.1653 Text en Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Mihaylova, Borislava
Briggs, Andrew
O'Hagan, Anthony
Thompson, Simon G
Review of Statistical Methods for Analysing Healthcare Resources and Costs
title Review of Statistical Methods for Analysing Healthcare Resources and Costs
title_full Review of Statistical Methods for Analysing Healthcare Resources and Costs
title_fullStr Review of Statistical Methods for Analysing Healthcare Resources and Costs
title_full_unstemmed Review of Statistical Methods for Analysing Healthcare Resources and Costs
title_short Review of Statistical Methods for Analysing Healthcare Resources and Costs
title_sort review of statistical methods for analysing healthcare resources and costs
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3470917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20799344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hec.1653
work_keys_str_mv AT mihaylovaborislava reviewofstatisticalmethodsforanalysinghealthcareresourcesandcosts
AT briggsandrew reviewofstatisticalmethodsforanalysinghealthcareresourcesandcosts
AT ohagananthony reviewofstatisticalmethodsforanalysinghealthcareresourcesandcosts
AT thompsonsimong reviewofstatisticalmethodsforanalysinghealthcareresourcesandcosts