Cargando…

Estimating the distribution of the window period for recent HIV infections: A comparison of statistical methods

In the past few years a number of antibody biomarkers have been developed to distinguish between recent and established Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection. Typically, a specific threshold/cut-off of the biomarker is chosen, values below which are indicative of recent infections. Such bioma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sweeting, Michael, De Angelis, Daniela, Parry, John, Suligoi, Barbara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3470924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21170913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.3941
_version_ 1782246330793459712
author Sweeting, Michael
De Angelis, Daniela
Parry, John
Suligoi, Barbara
author_facet Sweeting, Michael
De Angelis, Daniela
Parry, John
Suligoi, Barbara
author_sort Sweeting, Michael
collection PubMed
description In the past few years a number of antibody biomarkers have been developed to distinguish between recent and established Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection. Typically, a specific threshold/cut-off of the biomarker is chosen, values below which are indicative of recent infections. Such biomarkers have attracted considerable interest as the basis for incidence estimation using a cross-sectional sample. An estimate of HIV incidence can be obtained from the prevalence of recent infection, as measured in the sample, and knowledge of the time spent in the recent infection state, known as the window period. However, such calculations are based on a number of assumptions concerning the distribution of the window period. We compare two statistical methods for estimating the mean and distribution of a window period using data on repeated measurements of an antibody biomarker from a cohort of HIV seroconverters. The methods account for the interval-censored nature of both the date of seroconversion and the date of crossing a specific threshold. We illustrate the methods using repeated measurements of the Avidity Index (AI) and make recommendations about the choice of threshold for this biomarker so that the resulting window period satisfies the assumptions for incidence estimation. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3470924
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34709242012-10-18 Estimating the distribution of the window period for recent HIV infections: A comparison of statistical methods Sweeting, Michael De Angelis, Daniela Parry, John Suligoi, Barbara Stat Med Research Articles In the past few years a number of antibody biomarkers have been developed to distinguish between recent and established Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection. Typically, a specific threshold/cut-off of the biomarker is chosen, values below which are indicative of recent infections. Such biomarkers have attracted considerable interest as the basis for incidence estimation using a cross-sectional sample. An estimate of HIV incidence can be obtained from the prevalence of recent infection, as measured in the sample, and knowledge of the time spent in the recent infection state, known as the window period. However, such calculations are based on a number of assumptions concerning the distribution of the window period. We compare two statistical methods for estimating the mean and distribution of a window period using data on repeated measurements of an antibody biomarker from a cohort of HIV seroconverters. The methods account for the interval-censored nature of both the date of seroconversion and the date of crossing a specific threshold. We illustrate the methods using repeated measurements of the Avidity Index (AI) and make recommendations about the choice of threshold for this biomarker so that the resulting window period satisfies the assumptions for incidence estimation. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2010-12-30 2010-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3470924/ /pubmed/21170913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.3941 Text en Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Sweeting, Michael
De Angelis, Daniela
Parry, John
Suligoi, Barbara
Estimating the distribution of the window period for recent HIV infections: A comparison of statistical methods
title Estimating the distribution of the window period for recent HIV infections: A comparison of statistical methods
title_full Estimating the distribution of the window period for recent HIV infections: A comparison of statistical methods
title_fullStr Estimating the distribution of the window period for recent HIV infections: A comparison of statistical methods
title_full_unstemmed Estimating the distribution of the window period for recent HIV infections: A comparison of statistical methods
title_short Estimating the distribution of the window period for recent HIV infections: A comparison of statistical methods
title_sort estimating the distribution of the window period for recent hiv infections: a comparison of statistical methods
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3470924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21170913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.3941
work_keys_str_mv AT sweetingmichael estimatingthedistributionofthewindowperiodforrecenthivinfectionsacomparisonofstatisticalmethods
AT deangelisdaniela estimatingthedistributionofthewindowperiodforrecenthivinfectionsacomparisonofstatisticalmethods
AT parryjohn estimatingthedistributionofthewindowperiodforrecenthivinfectionsacomparisonofstatisticalmethods
AT suligoibarbara estimatingthedistributionofthewindowperiodforrecenthivinfectionsacomparisonofstatisticalmethods