Cargando…

Comparing epidemiologically estimated treatment need with treatment provided in two dental schemes in Ireland

BACKGROUND: Valid estimation of dental treatment needed at population level is important for service planning. In many instances, planning is informed by survey data, which provide epidemiologically estimated need from the dental fieldworkers’ perspective. The aim of this paper is to determine the v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guiney, Helena, Felicia, Patrick, Whelton, Helen, Woods, Noel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3470949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22898307
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-12-31
_version_ 1782246338152366080
author Guiney, Helena
Felicia, Patrick
Whelton, Helen
Woods, Noel
author_facet Guiney, Helena
Felicia, Patrick
Whelton, Helen
Woods, Noel
author_sort Guiney, Helena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Valid estimation of dental treatment needed at population level is important for service planning. In many instances, planning is informed by survey data, which provide epidemiologically estimated need from the dental fieldworkers’ perspective. The aim of this paper is to determine the validity of this type of information for planning. A comparison of normative (epidemiologically estimated) need for selected treatments, as measured on a randomly-selected representative sample, is compared with treatment actually provided in the population from which the sample was drawn. METHODS: This paper compares dental treatment need-estimates, from a national survey, with treatment provided within two choice-of-dentist schemes: Scheme 1, a co-payment scheme for employed adults, and Scheme 2, a ‘free’ service for less-well-off adults. Epidemiologically estimated need for extractions, restorations, advanced restorations and denture treatments was recorded for a nationally representative sample in 2000/02. Treatments provided to employed and less-well-off adults were retrieved from the claims databases for both schemes. We used the chi-square test to compare proportions, and the student’s t-test to compare means between the survey and claims databases. RESULTS: Among employed adults, the proportion of 35-44-year-olds whose teeth had restorations was greater than estimated as needed in the survey (55.7% vs. 36.7%;p <0.0001). Mean number of teeth extracted was less than estimated as needed among 35-44 and 65+ year-olds. Among less-well-off adults, the proportion of 16-24-year-olds who had teeth extracted was greater than estimated as needed in the survey (27.4% vs. 7.9%;p <0.0001). Mean number of restorations provided was greater than estimated as needed in the survey for 16-24-year-olds (3.0 vs. 0.9; p <0.0001) and 35-44-year-olds (2.7 vs. 1.4;p <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences were found between epidemiologically estimated need and treatment provided for selected treatments, which may be accounted for by measurement differences. The gap between epidemiologically estimated need and treatment provided seems to be greatest for less-well-off adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3470949
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34709492012-10-16 Comparing epidemiologically estimated treatment need with treatment provided in two dental schemes in Ireland Guiney, Helena Felicia, Patrick Whelton, Helen Woods, Noel BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Valid estimation of dental treatment needed at population level is important for service planning. In many instances, planning is informed by survey data, which provide epidemiologically estimated need from the dental fieldworkers’ perspective. The aim of this paper is to determine the validity of this type of information for planning. A comparison of normative (epidemiologically estimated) need for selected treatments, as measured on a randomly-selected representative sample, is compared with treatment actually provided in the population from which the sample was drawn. METHODS: This paper compares dental treatment need-estimates, from a national survey, with treatment provided within two choice-of-dentist schemes: Scheme 1, a co-payment scheme for employed adults, and Scheme 2, a ‘free’ service for less-well-off adults. Epidemiologically estimated need for extractions, restorations, advanced restorations and denture treatments was recorded for a nationally representative sample in 2000/02. Treatments provided to employed and less-well-off adults were retrieved from the claims databases for both schemes. We used the chi-square test to compare proportions, and the student’s t-test to compare means between the survey and claims databases. RESULTS: Among employed adults, the proportion of 35-44-year-olds whose teeth had restorations was greater than estimated as needed in the survey (55.7% vs. 36.7%;p <0.0001). Mean number of teeth extracted was less than estimated as needed among 35-44 and 65+ year-olds. Among less-well-off adults, the proportion of 16-24-year-olds who had teeth extracted was greater than estimated as needed in the survey (27.4% vs. 7.9%;p <0.0001). Mean number of restorations provided was greater than estimated as needed in the survey for 16-24-year-olds (3.0 vs. 0.9; p <0.0001) and 35-44-year-olds (2.7 vs. 1.4;p <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences were found between epidemiologically estimated need and treatment provided for selected treatments, which may be accounted for by measurement differences. The gap between epidemiologically estimated need and treatment provided seems to be greatest for less-well-off adults. BioMed Central 2012-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3470949/ /pubmed/22898307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-12-31 Text en Copyright ©2012 Guiney et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Guiney, Helena
Felicia, Patrick
Whelton, Helen
Woods, Noel
Comparing epidemiologically estimated treatment need with treatment provided in two dental schemes in Ireland
title Comparing epidemiologically estimated treatment need with treatment provided in two dental schemes in Ireland
title_full Comparing epidemiologically estimated treatment need with treatment provided in two dental schemes in Ireland
title_fullStr Comparing epidemiologically estimated treatment need with treatment provided in two dental schemes in Ireland
title_full_unstemmed Comparing epidemiologically estimated treatment need with treatment provided in two dental schemes in Ireland
title_short Comparing epidemiologically estimated treatment need with treatment provided in two dental schemes in Ireland
title_sort comparing epidemiologically estimated treatment need with treatment provided in two dental schemes in ireland
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3470949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22898307
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-12-31
work_keys_str_mv AT guineyhelena comparingepidemiologicallyestimatedtreatmentneedwithtreatmentprovidedintwodentalschemesinireland
AT feliciapatrick comparingepidemiologicallyestimatedtreatmentneedwithtreatmentprovidedintwodentalschemesinireland
AT wheltonhelen comparingepidemiologicallyestimatedtreatmentneedwithtreatmentprovidedintwodentalschemesinireland
AT woodsnoel comparingepidemiologicallyestimatedtreatmentneedwithtreatmentprovidedintwodentalschemesinireland