Cargando…

Quick, “Imputation-free” meta-analysis with proxy-SNPs

BACKGROUND: Meta-analysis (MA) is widely used to pool genome-wide association studies (GWASes) in order to a) increase the power to detect strong or weak genotype effects or b) as a result verification method. As a consequence of differing SNP panels among genotyping chips, imputation is the method...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meesters, Christian, Leber, Markus, Herold, Christine, Angisch, Marina, Mattheisen, Manuel, Drichel, Dmitriy, Lacour, André, Becker, Tim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3472171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22971100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-231
_version_ 1782246538981933056
author Meesters, Christian
Leber, Markus
Herold, Christine
Angisch, Marina
Mattheisen, Manuel
Drichel, Dmitriy
Lacour, André
Becker, Tim
author_facet Meesters, Christian
Leber, Markus
Herold, Christine
Angisch, Marina
Mattheisen, Manuel
Drichel, Dmitriy
Lacour, André
Becker, Tim
author_sort Meesters, Christian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Meta-analysis (MA) is widely used to pool genome-wide association studies (GWASes) in order to a) increase the power to detect strong or weak genotype effects or b) as a result verification method. As a consequence of differing SNP panels among genotyping chips, imputation is the method of choice within GWAS consortia to avoid losing too many SNPs in a MA. YAMAS (Yet Another Meta Analysis Software), however, enables cross-GWAS conclusions prior to finished and polished imputation runs, which eventually are time-consuming. RESULTS: Here we present a fast method to avoid forfeiting SNPs present in only a subset of studies, without relying on imputation. This is accomplished by using reference linkage disequilibrium data from 1,000 Genomes/HapMap projects to find proxy-SNPs together with in-phase alleles for SNPs missing in at least one study. MA is conducted by combining association effect estimates of a SNP and those of its proxy-SNPs. Our algorithm is implemented in the MA software YAMAS. Association results from GWAS analysis applications can be used as input files for MA, tremendously speeding up MA compared to the conventional imputation approach. We show that our proxy algorithm is well-powered and yields valuable ad hoc results, possibly providing an incentive for follow-up studies. We propose our method as a quick screening step prior to imputation-based MA, as well as an additional main approach for studies without available reference data matching the ethnicities of study participants. As a proof of principle, we analyzed six dbGaP Type II Diabetes GWAS and found that the proxy algorithm clearly outperforms naïve MA on the p-value level: for 17 out of 23 we observe an improvement on the p-value level by a factor of more than two, and a maximum improvement by a factor of 2127. CONCLUSIONS: YAMAS is an efficient and fast meta-analysis program which offers various methods, including conventional MA as well as inserting proxy-SNPs for missing markers to avoid unnecessary power loss. MA with YAMAS can be readily conducted as YAMAS provides a generic parser for heterogeneous tabulated file formats within the GWAS field and avoids cumbersome setups. In this way, it supplements the meta-analysis process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3472171
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34721712012-10-23 Quick, “Imputation-free” meta-analysis with proxy-SNPs Meesters, Christian Leber, Markus Herold, Christine Angisch, Marina Mattheisen, Manuel Drichel, Dmitriy Lacour, André Becker, Tim BMC Bioinformatics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Meta-analysis (MA) is widely used to pool genome-wide association studies (GWASes) in order to a) increase the power to detect strong or weak genotype effects or b) as a result verification method. As a consequence of differing SNP panels among genotyping chips, imputation is the method of choice within GWAS consortia to avoid losing too many SNPs in a MA. YAMAS (Yet Another Meta Analysis Software), however, enables cross-GWAS conclusions prior to finished and polished imputation runs, which eventually are time-consuming. RESULTS: Here we present a fast method to avoid forfeiting SNPs present in only a subset of studies, without relying on imputation. This is accomplished by using reference linkage disequilibrium data from 1,000 Genomes/HapMap projects to find proxy-SNPs together with in-phase alleles for SNPs missing in at least one study. MA is conducted by combining association effect estimates of a SNP and those of its proxy-SNPs. Our algorithm is implemented in the MA software YAMAS. Association results from GWAS analysis applications can be used as input files for MA, tremendously speeding up MA compared to the conventional imputation approach. We show that our proxy algorithm is well-powered and yields valuable ad hoc results, possibly providing an incentive for follow-up studies. We propose our method as a quick screening step prior to imputation-based MA, as well as an additional main approach for studies without available reference data matching the ethnicities of study participants. As a proof of principle, we analyzed six dbGaP Type II Diabetes GWAS and found that the proxy algorithm clearly outperforms naïve MA on the p-value level: for 17 out of 23 we observe an improvement on the p-value level by a factor of more than two, and a maximum improvement by a factor of 2127. CONCLUSIONS: YAMAS is an efficient and fast meta-analysis program which offers various methods, including conventional MA as well as inserting proxy-SNPs for missing markers to avoid unnecessary power loss. MA with YAMAS can be readily conducted as YAMAS provides a generic parser for heterogeneous tabulated file formats within the GWAS field and avoids cumbersome setups. In this way, it supplements the meta-analysis process. BioMed Central 2012-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3472171/ /pubmed/22971100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-231 Text en Copyright ©2012 Meesters et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Meesters, Christian
Leber, Markus
Herold, Christine
Angisch, Marina
Mattheisen, Manuel
Drichel, Dmitriy
Lacour, André
Becker, Tim
Quick, “Imputation-free” meta-analysis with proxy-SNPs
title Quick, “Imputation-free” meta-analysis with proxy-SNPs
title_full Quick, “Imputation-free” meta-analysis with proxy-SNPs
title_fullStr Quick, “Imputation-free” meta-analysis with proxy-SNPs
title_full_unstemmed Quick, “Imputation-free” meta-analysis with proxy-SNPs
title_short Quick, “Imputation-free” meta-analysis with proxy-SNPs
title_sort quick, “imputation-free” meta-analysis with proxy-snps
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3472171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22971100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-231
work_keys_str_mv AT meesterschristian quickimputationfreemetaanalysiswithproxysnps
AT lebermarkus quickimputationfreemetaanalysiswithproxysnps
AT heroldchristine quickimputationfreemetaanalysiswithproxysnps
AT angischmarina quickimputationfreemetaanalysiswithproxysnps
AT mattheisenmanuel quickimputationfreemetaanalysiswithproxysnps
AT dricheldmitriy quickimputationfreemetaanalysiswithproxysnps
AT lacourandre quickimputationfreemetaanalysiswithproxysnps
AT beckertim quickimputationfreemetaanalysiswithproxysnps