Cargando…

Barriers and facilitators to implementing Decision Boxes in primary healthcare teams to facilitate shared decisionmaking: a study protocol

BACKGROUND: Decision Boxes are summaries of the most important benefits and harms of health interventions provided to clinicians before they meet the patient, to prepare them to help patients make informed and value-based decisions. Our objective is to explore the barriers and facilitators to using...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giguere, Anik, Labrecque, Michel, Grad, Roland, Cauchon, Michel, Greenway, Matthew, Légaré, France, Pluye, Pierre, Turcotte, Stephane, Dolovich, Lisa, Haynes, R Brian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3472191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22867107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-85
_version_ 1782246544528900096
author Giguere, Anik
Labrecque, Michel
Grad, Roland
Cauchon, Michel
Greenway, Matthew
Légaré, France
Pluye, Pierre
Turcotte, Stephane
Dolovich, Lisa
Haynes, R Brian
author_facet Giguere, Anik
Labrecque, Michel
Grad, Roland
Cauchon, Michel
Greenway, Matthew
Légaré, France
Pluye, Pierre
Turcotte, Stephane
Dolovich, Lisa
Haynes, R Brian
author_sort Giguere, Anik
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Decision Boxes are summaries of the most important benefits and harms of health interventions provided to clinicians before they meet the patient, to prepare them to help patients make informed and value-based decisions. Our objective is to explore the barriers and facilitators to using Decision Boxes in clinical practice, more precisely factors stemming from (1) the Decision Boxes themselves, (2) the primary healthcare team (PHT), and (3) the primary care practice environment. METHODS/DESIGN: A two-phase mixed methods study will be conducted. Eight Decision Boxes relevant to primary care, and written in both English and in French, will be hosted on a website together with a tutorial to introduce the Decision Box. The Decision Boxes will be delivered as weekly emails over a span of eight weeks to clinicians of PHTs (family physicians, residents and nurses) in five primary care clinics located across two Canadian provinces. Using a web-questionnaire, clinicians will rate each Decision Box with the Information Assessment Method (cognitive impacts, relevance, usefulness, expected benefits) and with a questionnaire based on the Theory of Planned Behavior to study the determinants of clinicians’ intention to use what they learned from that Decision Box in their patient encounter (attitude, social norm, perceived behavioral control). Web-log data will be used to monitor clinicians’ access to the website. Following the 8-week intervention, we will conduct semi-structured group interviews with clinicians and individual interviews with clinic administrators to explore contextual factors influencing the use of the Decision Boxes. Data collected from questionnaires, focus groups and individual interviews will be combined to identify factors potentially influencing implementation of Decision Boxes in clinical practice by clinicians of PHTs. CONCLUSIONS: This project will allow tailoring of Decision Boxes and their delivery to overcome the specific barriers identified by clinicians of PHTs to improve the implementation of shared decision making in this setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3472191
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34721912012-10-17 Barriers and facilitators to implementing Decision Boxes in primary healthcare teams to facilitate shared decisionmaking: a study protocol Giguere, Anik Labrecque, Michel Grad, Roland Cauchon, Michel Greenway, Matthew Légaré, France Pluye, Pierre Turcotte, Stephane Dolovich, Lisa Haynes, R Brian BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Decision Boxes are summaries of the most important benefits and harms of health interventions provided to clinicians before they meet the patient, to prepare them to help patients make informed and value-based decisions. Our objective is to explore the barriers and facilitators to using Decision Boxes in clinical practice, more precisely factors stemming from (1) the Decision Boxes themselves, (2) the primary healthcare team (PHT), and (3) the primary care practice environment. METHODS/DESIGN: A two-phase mixed methods study will be conducted. Eight Decision Boxes relevant to primary care, and written in both English and in French, will be hosted on a website together with a tutorial to introduce the Decision Box. The Decision Boxes will be delivered as weekly emails over a span of eight weeks to clinicians of PHTs (family physicians, residents and nurses) in five primary care clinics located across two Canadian provinces. Using a web-questionnaire, clinicians will rate each Decision Box with the Information Assessment Method (cognitive impacts, relevance, usefulness, expected benefits) and with a questionnaire based on the Theory of Planned Behavior to study the determinants of clinicians’ intention to use what they learned from that Decision Box in their patient encounter (attitude, social norm, perceived behavioral control). Web-log data will be used to monitor clinicians’ access to the website. Following the 8-week intervention, we will conduct semi-structured group interviews with clinicians and individual interviews with clinic administrators to explore contextual factors influencing the use of the Decision Boxes. Data collected from questionnaires, focus groups and individual interviews will be combined to identify factors potentially influencing implementation of Decision Boxes in clinical practice by clinicians of PHTs. CONCLUSIONS: This project will allow tailoring of Decision Boxes and their delivery to overcome the specific barriers identified by clinicians of PHTs to improve the implementation of shared decision making in this setting. BioMed Central 2012-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3472191/ /pubmed/22867107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-85 Text en Copyright ©2012 Giguere et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Giguere, Anik
Labrecque, Michel
Grad, Roland
Cauchon, Michel
Greenway, Matthew
Légaré, France
Pluye, Pierre
Turcotte, Stephane
Dolovich, Lisa
Haynes, R Brian
Barriers and facilitators to implementing Decision Boxes in primary healthcare teams to facilitate shared decisionmaking: a study protocol
title Barriers and facilitators to implementing Decision Boxes in primary healthcare teams to facilitate shared decisionmaking: a study protocol
title_full Barriers and facilitators to implementing Decision Boxes in primary healthcare teams to facilitate shared decisionmaking: a study protocol
title_fullStr Barriers and facilitators to implementing Decision Boxes in primary healthcare teams to facilitate shared decisionmaking: a study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Barriers and facilitators to implementing Decision Boxes in primary healthcare teams to facilitate shared decisionmaking: a study protocol
title_short Barriers and facilitators to implementing Decision Boxes in primary healthcare teams to facilitate shared decisionmaking: a study protocol
title_sort barriers and facilitators to implementing decision boxes in primary healthcare teams to facilitate shared decisionmaking: a study protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3472191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22867107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-85
work_keys_str_mv AT giguereanik barriersandfacilitatorstoimplementingdecisionboxesinprimaryhealthcareteamstofacilitateshareddecisionmakingastudyprotocol
AT labrecquemichel barriersandfacilitatorstoimplementingdecisionboxesinprimaryhealthcareteamstofacilitateshareddecisionmakingastudyprotocol
AT gradroland barriersandfacilitatorstoimplementingdecisionboxesinprimaryhealthcareteamstofacilitateshareddecisionmakingastudyprotocol
AT cauchonmichel barriersandfacilitatorstoimplementingdecisionboxesinprimaryhealthcareteamstofacilitateshareddecisionmakingastudyprotocol
AT greenwaymatthew barriersandfacilitatorstoimplementingdecisionboxesinprimaryhealthcareteamstofacilitateshareddecisionmakingastudyprotocol
AT legarefrance barriersandfacilitatorstoimplementingdecisionboxesinprimaryhealthcareteamstofacilitateshareddecisionmakingastudyprotocol
AT pluyepierre barriersandfacilitatorstoimplementingdecisionboxesinprimaryhealthcareteamstofacilitateshareddecisionmakingastudyprotocol
AT turcottestephane barriersandfacilitatorstoimplementingdecisionboxesinprimaryhealthcareteamstofacilitateshareddecisionmakingastudyprotocol
AT dolovichlisa barriersandfacilitatorstoimplementingdecisionboxesinprimaryhealthcareteamstofacilitateshareddecisionmakingastudyprotocol
AT haynesrbrian barriersandfacilitatorstoimplementingdecisionboxesinprimaryhealthcareteamstofacilitateshareddecisionmakingastudyprotocol