Cargando…

Neural correlates of individual differences in manual imitation fidelity

Imitation is crucial for social learning, and so it is important to identify what determines between-subject variability in imitation fidelity. This might help explain what makes some people, like those with social difficulties such as in autism spectrum disorder (ASD), significantly worse at perfor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Braadbaart, Lieke, Waiter, Gordon D., Williams, Justin H. G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3472215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23087625
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2012.00091
_version_ 1782246551509270528
author Braadbaart, Lieke
Waiter, Gordon D.
Williams, Justin H. G.
author_facet Braadbaart, Lieke
Waiter, Gordon D.
Williams, Justin H. G.
author_sort Braadbaart, Lieke
collection PubMed
description Imitation is crucial for social learning, and so it is important to identify what determines between-subject variability in imitation fidelity. This might help explain what makes some people, like those with social difficulties such as in autism spectrum disorder (ASD), significantly worse at performance on these tasks than others. A novel paradigm was developed to provide objective measures of imitation fidelity in which participants used a touchscreen to imitate videos of a model drawing different shapes. Comparisons between model and participants' kinematic data provided three measures of imitative fidelity. We hypothesized that imitative ability would predict variation in BOLD signal whilst performing a simple imitation task in the MRI-scanner. In particular, an overall measure of accuracy (correlation between model and imitator) would predict activity in the overarching imitation system, whereas bias would be subject to more general aspects of motor control. Participants lying in the MRI-scanner were instructed to imitate different grips on a handle, or to watch someone or a circle moving the handle. Our hypothesis was partly confirmed as correlation between model and imitator was mediated by somatosensory cortex but also ventromedial prefrontal cortex, and bias was mediated mainly by cerebellum but also by the medial frontal and parietal cortices and insula. We suggest that this variance differentially reflects cognitive functions such as feedback-sensitivity and reward-dependent learning, contributing significantly to variability in individuals' imitative abilities as characterized by objective kinematic measures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3472215
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34722152012-10-19 Neural correlates of individual differences in manual imitation fidelity Braadbaart, Lieke Waiter, Gordon D. Williams, Justin H. G. Front Integr Neurosci Neuroscience Imitation is crucial for social learning, and so it is important to identify what determines between-subject variability in imitation fidelity. This might help explain what makes some people, like those with social difficulties such as in autism spectrum disorder (ASD), significantly worse at performance on these tasks than others. A novel paradigm was developed to provide objective measures of imitation fidelity in which participants used a touchscreen to imitate videos of a model drawing different shapes. Comparisons between model and participants' kinematic data provided three measures of imitative fidelity. We hypothesized that imitative ability would predict variation in BOLD signal whilst performing a simple imitation task in the MRI-scanner. In particular, an overall measure of accuracy (correlation between model and imitator) would predict activity in the overarching imitation system, whereas bias would be subject to more general aspects of motor control. Participants lying in the MRI-scanner were instructed to imitate different grips on a handle, or to watch someone or a circle moving the handle. Our hypothesis was partly confirmed as correlation between model and imitator was mediated by somatosensory cortex but also ventromedial prefrontal cortex, and bias was mediated mainly by cerebellum but also by the medial frontal and parietal cortices and insula. We suggest that this variance differentially reflects cognitive functions such as feedback-sensitivity and reward-dependent learning, contributing significantly to variability in individuals' imitative abilities as characterized by objective kinematic measures. Frontiers Media S.A. 2012-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3472215/ /pubmed/23087625 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2012.00091 Text en Copyright © 2012 Braadbaart, Waiter and Williams. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Braadbaart, Lieke
Waiter, Gordon D.
Williams, Justin H. G.
Neural correlates of individual differences in manual imitation fidelity
title Neural correlates of individual differences in manual imitation fidelity
title_full Neural correlates of individual differences in manual imitation fidelity
title_fullStr Neural correlates of individual differences in manual imitation fidelity
title_full_unstemmed Neural correlates of individual differences in manual imitation fidelity
title_short Neural correlates of individual differences in manual imitation fidelity
title_sort neural correlates of individual differences in manual imitation fidelity
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3472215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23087625
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2012.00091
work_keys_str_mv AT braadbaartlieke neuralcorrelatesofindividualdifferencesinmanualimitationfidelity
AT waitergordond neuralcorrelatesofindividualdifferencesinmanualimitationfidelity
AT williamsjustinhg neuralcorrelatesofindividualdifferencesinmanualimitationfidelity