Cargando…

Effects of oral valganciclovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus infection in heart transplant patients

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a serious complication following heart transplantation. This study (June 2003–January 2010) retrospectively assessed the effects of oral valganciclovir prophylaxis in adult heart transplant recipients during the first year after transplantation. METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doesch, Andreas O, Repp, Janika, Hofmann, Nina, Erbel, Christian, Frankenstein, Lutz, Gleissner, Christian A, Schmidt, Constanze, Ruhparwar, Arjang, Zugck, Christian, Schnitzler, Paul, Ehlermann, Philipp, Dengler, Thomas J, Katus, Hugo A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3472651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23091373
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S36578
_version_ 1782246626931245056
author Doesch, Andreas O
Repp, Janika
Hofmann, Nina
Erbel, Christian
Frankenstein, Lutz
Gleissner, Christian A
Schmidt, Constanze
Ruhparwar, Arjang
Zugck, Christian
Schnitzler, Paul
Ehlermann, Philipp
Dengler, Thomas J
Katus, Hugo A
author_facet Doesch, Andreas O
Repp, Janika
Hofmann, Nina
Erbel, Christian
Frankenstein, Lutz
Gleissner, Christian A
Schmidt, Constanze
Ruhparwar, Arjang
Zugck, Christian
Schnitzler, Paul
Ehlermann, Philipp
Dengler, Thomas J
Katus, Hugo A
author_sort Doesch, Andreas O
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a serious complication following heart transplantation. This study (June 2003–January 2010) retrospectively assessed the effects of oral valganciclovir prophylaxis in adult heart transplant recipients during the first year after transplantation. METHODS: In patients with normal renal function, 900 mg of oral valganciclovir was administered twice daily for 14 days after heart transplant followed by 900 mg per day for following 6 months. In the event of renal insufficiency, valganciclovir was adjusted according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Antigenemia testing for pp65 antigen and simultaneous polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were used to document exposure to CMV. From 2003 to 2010, 146 patients (74.0% men) of mean age 50.7 ± 10.3 years at the time of heart transplant were included. RESULTS: A total of 16 patients (11.0% of total, 75.0% male) had a positive pp65 and PCR result (ie, CMV infection) during the year following heart transplant; three of these patients had discontinued valganciclovir prophylaxis within the first 6 months following transplant because of leukopenia, including one patient developed CMV colitis. Two further patients developed CMV pneumonia during prophylactic valganciclovir therapy. Eight patients had positive pp65 and PCR tests in the 6–12 months after heart transplant following cessation of routine prophylaxis. One of these patients developed CMV pneumonia and another developed CMV colitis and CMV pneumonia. Thirty-seven of the 146 (25.3%) patients were CMV donor-seropositive/recipient-seronegative, and seven (18.9% of this subgroup) had a positive CMV test. In patients who were CMV donor-seropositive/recipient-seronegative, the risk of a positive CMV test (ie, CMV infection) was significantly elevated (P = 0.023). CONCLUSION: CMV prophylaxis with oral valganciclovir for 6 months following heart transplant is clinically feasible. In line with previous studies, CMV donor-seropositive/recipient-seronegative patients have a significantly elevated risk of CMV infection. In patients who prematurely discontinue valganciclovir, close monitoring of CMV antigenemia appears warranted. No significantly elevated rate of CMV infection was observed after 6 months of valganciclovir prophylaxis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3472651
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34726512012-10-22 Effects of oral valganciclovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus infection in heart transplant patients Doesch, Andreas O Repp, Janika Hofmann, Nina Erbel, Christian Frankenstein, Lutz Gleissner, Christian A Schmidt, Constanze Ruhparwar, Arjang Zugck, Christian Schnitzler, Paul Ehlermann, Philipp Dengler, Thomas J Katus, Hugo A Drug Des Devel Ther Original Research BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a serious complication following heart transplantation. This study (June 2003–January 2010) retrospectively assessed the effects of oral valganciclovir prophylaxis in adult heart transplant recipients during the first year after transplantation. METHODS: In patients with normal renal function, 900 mg of oral valganciclovir was administered twice daily for 14 days after heart transplant followed by 900 mg per day for following 6 months. In the event of renal insufficiency, valganciclovir was adjusted according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Antigenemia testing for pp65 antigen and simultaneous polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were used to document exposure to CMV. From 2003 to 2010, 146 patients (74.0% men) of mean age 50.7 ± 10.3 years at the time of heart transplant were included. RESULTS: A total of 16 patients (11.0% of total, 75.0% male) had a positive pp65 and PCR result (ie, CMV infection) during the year following heart transplant; three of these patients had discontinued valganciclovir prophylaxis within the first 6 months following transplant because of leukopenia, including one patient developed CMV colitis. Two further patients developed CMV pneumonia during prophylactic valganciclovir therapy. Eight patients had positive pp65 and PCR tests in the 6–12 months after heart transplant following cessation of routine prophylaxis. One of these patients developed CMV pneumonia and another developed CMV colitis and CMV pneumonia. Thirty-seven of the 146 (25.3%) patients were CMV donor-seropositive/recipient-seronegative, and seven (18.9% of this subgroup) had a positive CMV test. In patients who were CMV donor-seropositive/recipient-seronegative, the risk of a positive CMV test (ie, CMV infection) was significantly elevated (P = 0.023). CONCLUSION: CMV prophylaxis with oral valganciclovir for 6 months following heart transplant is clinically feasible. In line with previous studies, CMV donor-seropositive/recipient-seronegative patients have a significantly elevated risk of CMV infection. In patients who prematurely discontinue valganciclovir, close monitoring of CMV antigenemia appears warranted. No significantly elevated rate of CMV infection was observed after 6 months of valganciclovir prophylaxis. Dove Medical Press 2012-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3472651/ /pubmed/23091373 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S36578 Text en © 2012 Doesch et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Doesch, Andreas O
Repp, Janika
Hofmann, Nina
Erbel, Christian
Frankenstein, Lutz
Gleissner, Christian A
Schmidt, Constanze
Ruhparwar, Arjang
Zugck, Christian
Schnitzler, Paul
Ehlermann, Philipp
Dengler, Thomas J
Katus, Hugo A
Effects of oral valganciclovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus infection in heart transplant patients
title Effects of oral valganciclovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus infection in heart transplant patients
title_full Effects of oral valganciclovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus infection in heart transplant patients
title_fullStr Effects of oral valganciclovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus infection in heart transplant patients
title_full_unstemmed Effects of oral valganciclovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus infection in heart transplant patients
title_short Effects of oral valganciclovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus infection in heart transplant patients
title_sort effects of oral valganciclovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus infection in heart transplant patients
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3472651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23091373
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S36578
work_keys_str_mv AT doeschandreaso effectsoforalvalganciclovirprophylaxisforcytomegalovirusinfectioninhearttransplantpatients
AT reppjanika effectsoforalvalganciclovirprophylaxisforcytomegalovirusinfectioninhearttransplantpatients
AT hofmannnina effectsoforalvalganciclovirprophylaxisforcytomegalovirusinfectioninhearttransplantpatients
AT erbelchristian effectsoforalvalganciclovirprophylaxisforcytomegalovirusinfectioninhearttransplantpatients
AT frankensteinlutz effectsoforalvalganciclovirprophylaxisforcytomegalovirusinfectioninhearttransplantpatients
AT gleissnerchristiana effectsoforalvalganciclovirprophylaxisforcytomegalovirusinfectioninhearttransplantpatients
AT schmidtconstanze effectsoforalvalganciclovirprophylaxisforcytomegalovirusinfectioninhearttransplantpatients
AT ruhparwararjang effectsoforalvalganciclovirprophylaxisforcytomegalovirusinfectioninhearttransplantpatients
AT zugckchristian effectsoforalvalganciclovirprophylaxisforcytomegalovirusinfectioninhearttransplantpatients
AT schnitzlerpaul effectsoforalvalganciclovirprophylaxisforcytomegalovirusinfectioninhearttransplantpatients
AT ehlermannphilipp effectsoforalvalganciclovirprophylaxisforcytomegalovirusinfectioninhearttransplantpatients
AT denglerthomasj effectsoforalvalganciclovirprophylaxisforcytomegalovirusinfectioninhearttransplantpatients
AT katushugoa effectsoforalvalganciclovirprophylaxisforcytomegalovirusinfectioninhearttransplantpatients