Cargando…

Neuroprotection for Stroke: Current Status and Future Perspectives

Neuroprotection aims to prevent salvageable neurons from dying. Despite showing efficacy in experimental stroke studies, the concept of neuroprotection has failed in clinical trials. Reasons for the translational difficulties include a lack of methodological agreement between preclinical and clinica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Minnerup, Jens, Sutherland, Brad A., Buchan, Alastair M., Kleinschnitz, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3472773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23109881
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms130911753
_version_ 1782246656365821952
author Minnerup, Jens
Sutherland, Brad A.
Buchan, Alastair M.
Kleinschnitz, Christoph
author_facet Minnerup, Jens
Sutherland, Brad A.
Buchan, Alastair M.
Kleinschnitz, Christoph
author_sort Minnerup, Jens
collection PubMed
description Neuroprotection aims to prevent salvageable neurons from dying. Despite showing efficacy in experimental stroke studies, the concept of neuroprotection has failed in clinical trials. Reasons for the translational difficulties include a lack of methodological agreement between preclinical and clinical studies and the heterogeneity of stroke in humans compared to homogeneous strokes in animal models. Even when the international recommendations for preclinical stroke research, the Stroke Academic Industry Roundtable (STAIR) criteria, were followed, we have still seen limited success in the clinic, examples being NXY-059 and haematopoietic growth factors which fulfilled nearly all the STAIR criteria. However, there are a number of neuroprotective treatments under investigation in clinical trials such as hypothermia and ebselen. Moreover, promising neuroprotective treatments based on a deeper understanding of the complex pathophysiology of ischemic stroke such as inhibitors of NADPH oxidases and PSD-95 are currently evaluated in preclinical studies. Further concepts to improve translation include the investigation of neuroprotectants in multicenter preclinical Phase III-type studies, improved animal models, and close alignment between clinical trial and preclinical methodologies. Future successful translation will require both new concepts for preclinical testing and innovative approaches based on mechanistic insights into the ischemic cascade.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3472773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34727732012-10-29 Neuroprotection for Stroke: Current Status and Future Perspectives Minnerup, Jens Sutherland, Brad A. Buchan, Alastair M. Kleinschnitz, Christoph Int J Mol Sci Review Neuroprotection aims to prevent salvageable neurons from dying. Despite showing efficacy in experimental stroke studies, the concept of neuroprotection has failed in clinical trials. Reasons for the translational difficulties include a lack of methodological agreement between preclinical and clinical studies and the heterogeneity of stroke in humans compared to homogeneous strokes in animal models. Even when the international recommendations for preclinical stroke research, the Stroke Academic Industry Roundtable (STAIR) criteria, were followed, we have still seen limited success in the clinic, examples being NXY-059 and haematopoietic growth factors which fulfilled nearly all the STAIR criteria. However, there are a number of neuroprotective treatments under investigation in clinical trials such as hypothermia and ebselen. Moreover, promising neuroprotective treatments based on a deeper understanding of the complex pathophysiology of ischemic stroke such as inhibitors of NADPH oxidases and PSD-95 are currently evaluated in preclinical studies. Further concepts to improve translation include the investigation of neuroprotectants in multicenter preclinical Phase III-type studies, improved animal models, and close alignment between clinical trial and preclinical methodologies. Future successful translation will require both new concepts for preclinical testing and innovative approaches based on mechanistic insights into the ischemic cascade. Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2012-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3472773/ /pubmed/23109881 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms130911753 Text en © 2012 by the authors; licensee Molecular Diversity Preservation International, Basel, Switzerland. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Minnerup, Jens
Sutherland, Brad A.
Buchan, Alastair M.
Kleinschnitz, Christoph
Neuroprotection for Stroke: Current Status and Future Perspectives
title Neuroprotection for Stroke: Current Status and Future Perspectives
title_full Neuroprotection for Stroke: Current Status and Future Perspectives
title_fullStr Neuroprotection for Stroke: Current Status and Future Perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Neuroprotection for Stroke: Current Status and Future Perspectives
title_short Neuroprotection for Stroke: Current Status and Future Perspectives
title_sort neuroprotection for stroke: current status and future perspectives
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3472773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23109881
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms130911753
work_keys_str_mv AT minnerupjens neuroprotectionforstrokecurrentstatusandfutureperspectives
AT sutherlandbrada neuroprotectionforstrokecurrentstatusandfutureperspectives
AT buchanalastairm neuroprotectionforstrokecurrentstatusandfutureperspectives
AT kleinschnitzchristoph neuroprotectionforstrokecurrentstatusandfutureperspectives