Cargando…

A Comparison between Metaheuristics as Strategies for Minimizing Cyclic Instability in Ambient Intelligence

In this paper we present a comparison between six novel approaches to the fundamental problem of cyclic instability in Ambient Intelligence. These approaches are based on different optimization algorithms, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Bee Swarm Optimization (BSO), micro Particle Swarm Optimiza...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Romero, Leoncio A., Zamudio, Victor, Baltazar, Rosario, Mezura, Efren, Sotelo, Marco, Callaghan, Vic
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3472871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23112643
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s120810990
_version_ 1782246679187030016
author Romero, Leoncio A.
Zamudio, Victor
Baltazar, Rosario
Mezura, Efren
Sotelo, Marco
Callaghan, Vic
author_facet Romero, Leoncio A.
Zamudio, Victor
Baltazar, Rosario
Mezura, Efren
Sotelo, Marco
Callaghan, Vic
author_sort Romero, Leoncio A.
collection PubMed
description In this paper we present a comparison between six novel approaches to the fundamental problem of cyclic instability in Ambient Intelligence. These approaches are based on different optimization algorithms, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Bee Swarm Optimization (BSO), micro Particle Swarm Optimization (μ-PSO), Artificial Immune System (AIS), Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Mutual Information Maximization for Input Clustering (MIMIC). In order to be able to use these algorithms, we introduced the concept of Average Cumulative Oscillation (ACO), which enabled us to measure the average behavior of the system. This approach has the advantage that it does not need to analyze the topological properties of the system, in particular the loops, which can be computationally expensive. In order to test these algorithms we used the well-known discrete system called the Game of Life for 9, 25, 49 and 289 agents. It was found that PSO and μ-PSO have the best performance in terms of the number of agents locked. These results were confirmed using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test. This novel and successful approach is very promising and can be used to remove instabilities in real scenarios with a large number of agents (including nomadic agents) and complex interactions and dependencies among them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3472871
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34728712012-10-30 A Comparison between Metaheuristics as Strategies for Minimizing Cyclic Instability in Ambient Intelligence Romero, Leoncio A. Zamudio, Victor Baltazar, Rosario Mezura, Efren Sotelo, Marco Callaghan, Vic Sensors (Basel) Article In this paper we present a comparison between six novel approaches to the fundamental problem of cyclic instability in Ambient Intelligence. These approaches are based on different optimization algorithms, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Bee Swarm Optimization (BSO), micro Particle Swarm Optimization (μ-PSO), Artificial Immune System (AIS), Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Mutual Information Maximization for Input Clustering (MIMIC). In order to be able to use these algorithms, we introduced the concept of Average Cumulative Oscillation (ACO), which enabled us to measure the average behavior of the system. This approach has the advantage that it does not need to analyze the topological properties of the system, in particular the loops, which can be computationally expensive. In order to test these algorithms we used the well-known discrete system called the Game of Life for 9, 25, 49 and 289 agents. It was found that PSO and μ-PSO have the best performance in terms of the number of agents locked. These results were confirmed using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test. This novel and successful approach is very promising and can be used to remove instabilities in real scenarios with a large number of agents (including nomadic agents) and complex interactions and dependencies among them. Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2012-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3472871/ /pubmed/23112643 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s120810990 Text en © 2012 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Romero, Leoncio A.
Zamudio, Victor
Baltazar, Rosario
Mezura, Efren
Sotelo, Marco
Callaghan, Vic
A Comparison between Metaheuristics as Strategies for Minimizing Cyclic Instability in Ambient Intelligence
title A Comparison between Metaheuristics as Strategies for Minimizing Cyclic Instability in Ambient Intelligence
title_full A Comparison between Metaheuristics as Strategies for Minimizing Cyclic Instability in Ambient Intelligence
title_fullStr A Comparison between Metaheuristics as Strategies for Minimizing Cyclic Instability in Ambient Intelligence
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison between Metaheuristics as Strategies for Minimizing Cyclic Instability in Ambient Intelligence
title_short A Comparison between Metaheuristics as Strategies for Minimizing Cyclic Instability in Ambient Intelligence
title_sort comparison between metaheuristics as strategies for minimizing cyclic instability in ambient intelligence
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3472871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23112643
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s120810990
work_keys_str_mv AT romeroleoncioa acomparisonbetweenmetaheuristicsasstrategiesforminimizingcyclicinstabilityinambientintelligence
AT zamudiovictor acomparisonbetweenmetaheuristicsasstrategiesforminimizingcyclicinstabilityinambientintelligence
AT baltazarrosario acomparisonbetweenmetaheuristicsasstrategiesforminimizingcyclicinstabilityinambientintelligence
AT mezuraefren acomparisonbetweenmetaheuristicsasstrategiesforminimizingcyclicinstabilityinambientintelligence
AT sotelomarco acomparisonbetweenmetaheuristicsasstrategiesforminimizingcyclicinstabilityinambientintelligence
AT callaghanvic acomparisonbetweenmetaheuristicsasstrategiesforminimizingcyclicinstabilityinambientintelligence
AT romeroleoncioa comparisonbetweenmetaheuristicsasstrategiesforminimizingcyclicinstabilityinambientintelligence
AT zamudiovictor comparisonbetweenmetaheuristicsasstrategiesforminimizingcyclicinstabilityinambientintelligence
AT baltazarrosario comparisonbetweenmetaheuristicsasstrategiesforminimizingcyclicinstabilityinambientintelligence
AT mezuraefren comparisonbetweenmetaheuristicsasstrategiesforminimizingcyclicinstabilityinambientintelligence
AT sotelomarco comparisonbetweenmetaheuristicsasstrategiesforminimizingcyclicinstabilityinambientintelligence
AT callaghanvic comparisonbetweenmetaheuristicsasstrategiesforminimizingcyclicinstabilityinambientintelligence