Cargando…

The optimization of needle electrode number and placement for irreversible electroporation of hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a novel ablation tool that uses brief high-voltage pulses to treat cancer. The efficacy of the therapy depends upon the distribution of the electric field, which in turn depends upon the configuration of electrodes used. METHODS: We sought to optimiz...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adeyanju, Oyinlolu O., Al-Angari, Haitham M., Sahakian, Alan V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Versita, Warsaw 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3472940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23077449
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10019-012-0026-y
_version_ 1782246691056910336
author Adeyanju, Oyinlolu O.
Al-Angari, Haitham M.
Sahakian, Alan V.
author_facet Adeyanju, Oyinlolu O.
Al-Angari, Haitham M.
Sahakian, Alan V.
author_sort Adeyanju, Oyinlolu O.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a novel ablation tool that uses brief high-voltage pulses to treat cancer. The efficacy of the therapy depends upon the distribution of the electric field, which in turn depends upon the configuration of electrodes used. METHODS: We sought to optimize the electrode configuration in terms of the distance between electrodes, the depth of electrode insertion, and the number of electrodes. We employed a 3D Finite Element Model and systematically varied the distance between the electrodes and the depth of electrode insertion, monitoring the lowest voltage sufficient to ablate the tumor, V(IRE). We also measured the amount of normal (non-cancerous) tissue ablated. Measurements were performed for two electrodes, three electrodes, and four electrodes. The optimal electrode configuration was determined to be the one with the lowest V(IRE), as that minimized damage to normal tissue. RESULTS: The optimal electrode configuration to ablate a 2.5 cm spheroidal tumor used two electrodes with a distance of 2 cm between the electrodes and a depth of insertion of 1 cm below the halfway point in the spherical tumor, as measured from the bottom of the electrode. This produced a V(IRE) of 3700 V. We found that it was generally best to have a small distance between the electrodes and for the center of the electrodes to be inserted at a depth equal to or deeper than the center of the tumor. We also found the distance between electrodes was far more important in influencing the outcome measures when compared with the depth of electrode insertion. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the distribution of electric field is highly dependent upon the electrode configuration, but the optimal configuration can be determined using numerical modeling. Our findings can help guide the clinical application of IRE as well as the selection of the best optimization algorithm to use in finding the optimal electrode configuration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3472940
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Versita, Warsaw
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34729402012-10-17 The optimization of needle electrode number and placement for irreversible electroporation of hepatocellular carcinoma Adeyanju, Oyinlolu O. Al-Angari, Haitham M. Sahakian, Alan V. Radiol Oncol Research Article BACKGROUND: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a novel ablation tool that uses brief high-voltage pulses to treat cancer. The efficacy of the therapy depends upon the distribution of the electric field, which in turn depends upon the configuration of electrodes used. METHODS: We sought to optimize the electrode configuration in terms of the distance between electrodes, the depth of electrode insertion, and the number of electrodes. We employed a 3D Finite Element Model and systematically varied the distance between the electrodes and the depth of electrode insertion, monitoring the lowest voltage sufficient to ablate the tumor, V(IRE). We also measured the amount of normal (non-cancerous) tissue ablated. Measurements were performed for two electrodes, three electrodes, and four electrodes. The optimal electrode configuration was determined to be the one with the lowest V(IRE), as that minimized damage to normal tissue. RESULTS: The optimal electrode configuration to ablate a 2.5 cm spheroidal tumor used two electrodes with a distance of 2 cm between the electrodes and a depth of insertion of 1 cm below the halfway point in the spherical tumor, as measured from the bottom of the electrode. This produced a V(IRE) of 3700 V. We found that it was generally best to have a small distance between the electrodes and for the center of the electrodes to be inserted at a depth equal to or deeper than the center of the tumor. We also found the distance between electrodes was far more important in influencing the outcome measures when compared with the depth of electrode insertion. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the distribution of electric field is highly dependent upon the electrode configuration, but the optimal configuration can be determined using numerical modeling. Our findings can help guide the clinical application of IRE as well as the selection of the best optimization algorithm to use in finding the optimal electrode configuration. Versita, Warsaw 2012-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3472940/ /pubmed/23077449 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10019-012-0026-y Text en Copyright © by Association of Radiology & Oncology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Adeyanju, Oyinlolu O.
Al-Angari, Haitham M.
Sahakian, Alan V.
The optimization of needle electrode number and placement for irreversible electroporation of hepatocellular carcinoma
title The optimization of needle electrode number and placement for irreversible electroporation of hepatocellular carcinoma
title_full The optimization of needle electrode number and placement for irreversible electroporation of hepatocellular carcinoma
title_fullStr The optimization of needle electrode number and placement for irreversible electroporation of hepatocellular carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed The optimization of needle electrode number and placement for irreversible electroporation of hepatocellular carcinoma
title_short The optimization of needle electrode number and placement for irreversible electroporation of hepatocellular carcinoma
title_sort optimization of needle electrode number and placement for irreversible electroporation of hepatocellular carcinoma
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3472940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23077449
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10019-012-0026-y
work_keys_str_mv AT adeyanjuoyinloluo theoptimizationofneedleelectrodenumberandplacementforirreversibleelectroporationofhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT alangarihaithamm theoptimizationofneedleelectrodenumberandplacementforirreversibleelectroporationofhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT sahakianalanv theoptimizationofneedleelectrodenumberandplacementforirreversibleelectroporationofhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT adeyanjuoyinloluo optimizationofneedleelectrodenumberandplacementforirreversibleelectroporationofhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT alangarihaithamm optimizationofneedleelectrodenumberandplacementforirreversibleelectroporationofhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT sahakianalanv optimizationofneedleelectrodenumberandplacementforirreversibleelectroporationofhepatocellularcarcinoma