Cargando…
Open Evaluation: A Vision for Entirely Transparent Post-Publication Peer Review and Rating for Science
The two major functions of a scientific publishing system are to provide access to and evaluation of scientific papers. While open access (OA) is becoming a reality, open evaluation (OE), the other side of the coin, has received less attention. Evaluation steers the attention of the scientific commu...
Autor principal: | Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3473231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23087639 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2012.00079 |
Ejemplares similares
-
An emerging consensus for open evaluation: 18 visions for the future of scientific publishing
por: Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Aggregating post-publication peer reviews and ratings
por: Florian, Răzvan V.
Publicado: (2012) -
Post-Publication Peer Review: Opening Up Scientific Conversation
por: Hunter, Jane
Publicado: (2012) -
Multi-Stage Open Peer Review: Scientific Evaluation Integrating the Strengths of Traditional Peer Review with the Virtues of Transparency and Self-Regulation
por: Pöschl, Ulrich
Publicado: (2012) -
Relating Population-Code Representations between Man, Monkey, and Computational Models
por: Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus
Publicado: (2009)