Cargando…
The language of gene ontology: a Zipf’s law analysis
BACKGROUND: Most major genome projects and sequence databases provide a GO annotation of their data, either automatically or through human annotators, creating a large corpus of data written in the language of GO. Texts written in natural language show a statistical power law behaviour, Zipf’s law,...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3473240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22676436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-127 |
_version_ | 1782246732128583680 |
---|---|
author | Kalankesh, Leila Ranandeh Stevens, Robert Brass, Andy |
author_facet | Kalankesh, Leila Ranandeh Stevens, Robert Brass, Andy |
author_sort | Kalankesh, Leila Ranandeh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Most major genome projects and sequence databases provide a GO annotation of their data, either automatically or through human annotators, creating a large corpus of data written in the language of GO. Texts written in natural language show a statistical power law behaviour, Zipf’s law, the exponent of which can provide useful information on the nature of the language being used. We have therefore explored the hypothesis that collections of GO annotations will show similar statistical behaviours to natural language. RESULTS: Annotations from the Gene Ontology Annotation project were found to follow Zipf’s law. Surprisingly, the measured power law exponents were consistently different between annotation captured using the three GO sub-ontologies in the corpora (function, process and component). On filtering the corpora using GO evidence codes we found that the value of the measured power law exponent responded in a predictable way as a function of the evidence codes used to support the annotation. CONCLUSIONS: Techniques from computational linguistics can provide new insights into the annotation process. GO annotations show similar statistical behaviours to those seen in natural language with measured exponents that provide a signal which correlates with the nature of the evidence codes used to support the annotations, suggesting that the measured exponent might provide a signal regarding the information content of the annotation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3473240 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34732402012-10-23 The language of gene ontology: a Zipf’s law analysis Kalankesh, Leila Ranandeh Stevens, Robert Brass, Andy BMC Bioinformatics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Most major genome projects and sequence databases provide a GO annotation of their data, either automatically or through human annotators, creating a large corpus of data written in the language of GO. Texts written in natural language show a statistical power law behaviour, Zipf’s law, the exponent of which can provide useful information on the nature of the language being used. We have therefore explored the hypothesis that collections of GO annotations will show similar statistical behaviours to natural language. RESULTS: Annotations from the Gene Ontology Annotation project were found to follow Zipf’s law. Surprisingly, the measured power law exponents were consistently different between annotation captured using the three GO sub-ontologies in the corpora (function, process and component). On filtering the corpora using GO evidence codes we found that the value of the measured power law exponent responded in a predictable way as a function of the evidence codes used to support the annotation. CONCLUSIONS: Techniques from computational linguistics can provide new insights into the annotation process. GO annotations show similar statistical behaviours to those seen in natural language with measured exponents that provide a signal which correlates with the nature of the evidence codes used to support the annotations, suggesting that the measured exponent might provide a signal regarding the information content of the annotation. BioMed Central 2012-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3473240/ /pubmed/22676436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-127 Text en Copyright ©2012 Kalankesh et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Article Kalankesh, Leila Ranandeh Stevens, Robert Brass, Andy The language of gene ontology: a Zipf’s law analysis |
title | The language of gene ontology: a Zipf’s law analysis |
title_full | The language of gene ontology: a Zipf’s law analysis |
title_fullStr | The language of gene ontology: a Zipf’s law analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The language of gene ontology: a Zipf’s law analysis |
title_short | The language of gene ontology: a Zipf’s law analysis |
title_sort | language of gene ontology: a zipf’s law analysis |
topic | Methodology Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3473240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22676436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-127 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kalankeshleilaranandeh thelanguageofgeneontologyazipfslawanalysis AT stevensrobert thelanguageofgeneontologyazipfslawanalysis AT brassandy thelanguageofgeneontologyazipfslawanalysis AT kalankeshleilaranandeh languageofgeneontologyazipfslawanalysis AT stevensrobert languageofgeneontologyazipfslawanalysis AT brassandy languageofgeneontologyazipfslawanalysis |