Cargando…

Pelvic exenteration for colorectal cancer: oncologic outcome in 59 patients at a single institution

BACKGROUND: Pelvic exenteration (PE) continues to be the only curative option in selected patients with advanced or recurrent pelvic neoplasms. A current debate exists concerning the appropriate selection of patients for PE, with the most important factor being the absence of extrapelvic disease. AI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: López-Basave, Horacio N, Morales-Vásquez, Flavia, Herrera-Gómez, Ángel, Rosciano, Alejandro Padilla, Meneses-García, Abelardo, Ruiz-Molina, Juan M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3474142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23091398
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S34545
_version_ 1782246765577109504
author López-Basave, Horacio N
Morales-Vásquez, Flavia
Herrera-Gómez, Ángel
Rosciano, Alejandro Padilla
Meneses-García, Abelardo
Ruiz-Molina, Juan M
author_facet López-Basave, Horacio N
Morales-Vásquez, Flavia
Herrera-Gómez, Ángel
Rosciano, Alejandro Padilla
Meneses-García, Abelardo
Ruiz-Molina, Juan M
author_sort López-Basave, Horacio N
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pelvic exenteration (PE) continues to be the only curative option in selected patients with advanced or recurrent pelvic neoplasms. A current debate exists concerning the appropriate selection of patients for PE, with the most important factor being the absence of extrapelvic disease. AIM: To evaluate the outcome of patients submitted to exenterative surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A review of the clinical charts of patients with colorectal cancer who underwent PE between January 1994 and June 2010 at the Institute National of Cancerología in Mexico City was performed. RESULTS: We selected 59 patients, 53 of whom were females (90%), and six of whom were males (10%). Mean age at the time of diagnosis was 50 years (range, 21–77 years). A total of 51 patients underwent posterior PE (86%), and eight patients underwent total PE (14%). Operative mortality occurred in two cases (3%), and 29 patients developed complications (49%). Overall, 11 patients (19%) experienced local failure with mean disease-free survival time of 10.2 months. After a mean follow-up of 28.3 months, nine patients are still alive without evidence of the disease (15%). CONCLUSIONS: PE should be considered in advanced colorectal cancer without extrapelvic metastatic disease. PE is accompanied by considerable morbidity (49%) and mortality (3%), but local control is desirable. Overall survival justifies the use of this procedure in patients with primary or recurrent locally advanced rectal cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3474142
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34741422012-10-22 Pelvic exenteration for colorectal cancer: oncologic outcome in 59 patients at a single institution López-Basave, Horacio N Morales-Vásquez, Flavia Herrera-Gómez, Ángel Rosciano, Alejandro Padilla Meneses-García, Abelardo Ruiz-Molina, Juan M Cancer Manag Res Review BACKGROUND: Pelvic exenteration (PE) continues to be the only curative option in selected patients with advanced or recurrent pelvic neoplasms. A current debate exists concerning the appropriate selection of patients for PE, with the most important factor being the absence of extrapelvic disease. AIM: To evaluate the outcome of patients submitted to exenterative surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A review of the clinical charts of patients with colorectal cancer who underwent PE between January 1994 and June 2010 at the Institute National of Cancerología in Mexico City was performed. RESULTS: We selected 59 patients, 53 of whom were females (90%), and six of whom were males (10%). Mean age at the time of diagnosis was 50 years (range, 21–77 years). A total of 51 patients underwent posterior PE (86%), and eight patients underwent total PE (14%). Operative mortality occurred in two cases (3%), and 29 patients developed complications (49%). Overall, 11 patients (19%) experienced local failure with mean disease-free survival time of 10.2 months. After a mean follow-up of 28.3 months, nine patients are still alive without evidence of the disease (15%). CONCLUSIONS: PE should be considered in advanced colorectal cancer without extrapelvic metastatic disease. PE is accompanied by considerable morbidity (49%) and mortality (3%), but local control is desirable. Overall survival justifies the use of this procedure in patients with primary or recurrent locally advanced rectal cancer. Dove Medical Press 2012-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3474142/ /pubmed/23091398 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S34545 Text en © 2012 López-Basave et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
López-Basave, Horacio N
Morales-Vásquez, Flavia
Herrera-Gómez, Ángel
Rosciano, Alejandro Padilla
Meneses-García, Abelardo
Ruiz-Molina, Juan M
Pelvic exenteration for colorectal cancer: oncologic outcome in 59 patients at a single institution
title Pelvic exenteration for colorectal cancer: oncologic outcome in 59 patients at a single institution
title_full Pelvic exenteration for colorectal cancer: oncologic outcome in 59 patients at a single institution
title_fullStr Pelvic exenteration for colorectal cancer: oncologic outcome in 59 patients at a single institution
title_full_unstemmed Pelvic exenteration for colorectal cancer: oncologic outcome in 59 patients at a single institution
title_short Pelvic exenteration for colorectal cancer: oncologic outcome in 59 patients at a single institution
title_sort pelvic exenteration for colorectal cancer: oncologic outcome in 59 patients at a single institution
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3474142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23091398
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S34545
work_keys_str_mv AT lopezbasavehoracion pelvicexenterationforcolorectalcanceroncologicoutcomein59patientsatasingleinstitution
AT moralesvasquezflavia pelvicexenterationforcolorectalcanceroncologicoutcomein59patientsatasingleinstitution
AT herreragomezangel pelvicexenterationforcolorectalcanceroncologicoutcomein59patientsatasingleinstitution
AT roscianoalejandropadilla pelvicexenterationforcolorectalcanceroncologicoutcomein59patientsatasingleinstitution
AT menesesgarciaabelardo pelvicexenterationforcolorectalcanceroncologicoutcomein59patientsatasingleinstitution
AT ruizmolinajuanm pelvicexenterationforcolorectalcanceroncologicoutcomein59patientsatasingleinstitution