Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of an exercise program during pregnancy to prevent gestational diabetes: Results of an economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is increasing worldwide. GDM and the risks associated with GDM lead to increased health care costs and losses in productivity. The objective of this study is to evaluate whether the FitFor2 exercise program during pregnancy is cost-ef...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oostdam, Nicolette, Bosmans, Judith, Wouters, Maurice GAJ, Eekhoff, Elisabeth MW, van Mechelen, Willem, van Poppel, Mireille NM
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3475114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22762376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-12-64
_version_ 1782246909256138752
author Oostdam, Nicolette
Bosmans, Judith
Wouters, Maurice GAJ
Eekhoff, Elisabeth MW
van Mechelen, Willem
van Poppel, Mireille NM
author_facet Oostdam, Nicolette
Bosmans, Judith
Wouters, Maurice GAJ
Eekhoff, Elisabeth MW
van Mechelen, Willem
van Poppel, Mireille NM
author_sort Oostdam, Nicolette
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is increasing worldwide. GDM and the risks associated with GDM lead to increased health care costs and losses in productivity. The objective of this study is to evaluate whether the FitFor2 exercise program during pregnancy is cost-effective from a societal perspective as compared to standard care. METHODS: A randomised controlled trial (RCT) and simultaneous economic evaluation of the FitFor2 program were conducted. Pregnant women at risk for GDM were randomised to an exercise program to prevent high maternal blood glucose (n = 62) or to standard care (n = 59). The exercise program consisted of two sessions of aerobic and strengthening exercises per week. Clinical outcome measures were maternal fasting blood glucose levels, insulin sensitivity and infant birth weight. Quality of life was measured using the EuroQol 5-D and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated. Resource utilization and sick leave data were collected by questionnaires. Data were analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputations. Bootstrapping techniques estimated the uncertainty surrounding the cost differences and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in any outcome measure. During pregnancy, total health care costs and costs of productivity losses were statistically non-significant (mean difference €1308; 95%CI €-229 - €3204). The cost-effectiveness analyses showed that the exercise program was not cost-effective in comparison to the control group for blood glucose levels, insulin sensitivity, infant birth weight or QALYs. CONCLUSION: The twice-weekly exercise program for pregnant women at risk for GDM evaluated in the present study was not cost-effective compared to standard care. Based on these results, implementation of this exercise program for the prevention of GDM cannot be recommended. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTR1139
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3475114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34751142012-10-19 Cost-effectiveness of an exercise program during pregnancy to prevent gestational diabetes: Results of an economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial Oostdam, Nicolette Bosmans, Judith Wouters, Maurice GAJ Eekhoff, Elisabeth MW van Mechelen, Willem van Poppel, Mireille NM BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is increasing worldwide. GDM and the risks associated with GDM lead to increased health care costs and losses in productivity. The objective of this study is to evaluate whether the FitFor2 exercise program during pregnancy is cost-effective from a societal perspective as compared to standard care. METHODS: A randomised controlled trial (RCT) and simultaneous economic evaluation of the FitFor2 program were conducted. Pregnant women at risk for GDM were randomised to an exercise program to prevent high maternal blood glucose (n = 62) or to standard care (n = 59). The exercise program consisted of two sessions of aerobic and strengthening exercises per week. Clinical outcome measures were maternal fasting blood glucose levels, insulin sensitivity and infant birth weight. Quality of life was measured using the EuroQol 5-D and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated. Resource utilization and sick leave data were collected by questionnaires. Data were analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputations. Bootstrapping techniques estimated the uncertainty surrounding the cost differences and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in any outcome measure. During pregnancy, total health care costs and costs of productivity losses were statistically non-significant (mean difference €1308; 95%CI €-229 - €3204). The cost-effectiveness analyses showed that the exercise program was not cost-effective in comparison to the control group for blood glucose levels, insulin sensitivity, infant birth weight or QALYs. CONCLUSION: The twice-weekly exercise program for pregnant women at risk for GDM evaluated in the present study was not cost-effective compared to standard care. Based on these results, implementation of this exercise program for the prevention of GDM cannot be recommended. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTR1139 BioMed Central 2012-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3475114/ /pubmed/22762376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-12-64 Text en Copyright ©2012 Oostdam et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Oostdam, Nicolette
Bosmans, Judith
Wouters, Maurice GAJ
Eekhoff, Elisabeth MW
van Mechelen, Willem
van Poppel, Mireille NM
Cost-effectiveness of an exercise program during pregnancy to prevent gestational diabetes: Results of an economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial
title Cost-effectiveness of an exercise program during pregnancy to prevent gestational diabetes: Results of an economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial
title_full Cost-effectiveness of an exercise program during pregnancy to prevent gestational diabetes: Results of an economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of an exercise program during pregnancy to prevent gestational diabetes: Results of an economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of an exercise program during pregnancy to prevent gestational diabetes: Results of an economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial
title_short Cost-effectiveness of an exercise program during pregnancy to prevent gestational diabetes: Results of an economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial
title_sort cost-effectiveness of an exercise program during pregnancy to prevent gestational diabetes: results of an economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3475114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22762376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-12-64
work_keys_str_mv AT oostdamnicolette costeffectivenessofanexerciseprogramduringpregnancytopreventgestationaldiabetesresultsofaneconomicevaluationalongsidearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bosmansjudith costeffectivenessofanexerciseprogramduringpregnancytopreventgestationaldiabetesresultsofaneconomicevaluationalongsidearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT woutersmauricegaj costeffectivenessofanexerciseprogramduringpregnancytopreventgestationaldiabetesresultsofaneconomicevaluationalongsidearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT eekhoffelisabethmw costeffectivenessofanexerciseprogramduringpregnancytopreventgestationaldiabetesresultsofaneconomicevaluationalongsidearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vanmechelenwillem costeffectivenessofanexerciseprogramduringpregnancytopreventgestationaldiabetesresultsofaneconomicevaluationalongsidearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vanpoppelmireillenm costeffectivenessofanexerciseprogramduringpregnancytopreventgestationaldiabetesresultsofaneconomicevaluationalongsidearandomisedcontrolledtrial