Cargando…

Clinical descriptive measures of shoulder range of motion for a healthy, young and physically active cohort

BACKGROUND: The objective of this innovative research study was to describe clinical shoulder complex range of motion (ROM) measures for a young, healthy, and physically active population. This investigation represents a cross-sectional experiment conducted at a military academy-based sports medicin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vairo, Giampietr L, Duffey, Michele L, Owens, Brett D, Cameron, Kenneth L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3475119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22964130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-2555-4-33
_version_ 1782246910476681216
author Vairo, Giampietr L
Duffey, Michele L
Owens, Brett D
Cameron, Kenneth L
author_facet Vairo, Giampietr L
Duffey, Michele L
Owens, Brett D
Cameron, Kenneth L
author_sort Vairo, Giampietr L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The objective of this innovative research study was to describe clinical shoulder complex range of motion (ROM) measures for a young, healthy, and physically active population. This investigation represents a cross-sectional experiment conducted at a military academy-based sports medicine center. Military cadets with no history of shoulder complex injury were assessed within two months of enrollment in the academy; 548 men (18.8 ± 1.0 yr, 75.2 ± 12.2 kg, 178.3 ± 7.4 cm) and 74 women (18.7 ± 0.9 yr, 63.2 ± 8.9 kg, 165.2 ± 6.9 cm) participated. Descriptive measures included cross-body adduction (CAD), flexion (FLX), external rotation (ER0) with the shoulder complex in adduction and elbow flexed to 90°, internal and external rotation (IR, ER) with the shoulder complex at 90° of abduction and elbow flexed to 90° as well as arc (ARC) of IR-ER using standardized clinical quantification techniques. Bilateral and sex differences were evaluated using dependent and independent t-tests, respectively. Percentiles by arm dominance and sex were also calculated for all ROM measures. RESULTS: Data were normally distributed. Active and passive ROM measures indicated significant bilateral differences (P < 0.05) except for ARC. Sex differences (P < 0.05) were noted for active and passive CAD, FLX and ER0 for the dominant arm as well as active and passive CAD, FLX and ARC for the non-dominant arm. CONCLUSIONS: These original data provide descriptive measures for shoulder complex ROM excursions, assisting sports medicine practitioners in potentially identifying clinical deficiencies and functional outcomes following shoulder injury.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3475119
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34751192012-10-19 Clinical descriptive measures of shoulder range of motion for a healthy, young and physically active cohort Vairo, Giampietr L Duffey, Michele L Owens, Brett D Cameron, Kenneth L Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol Short Report BACKGROUND: The objective of this innovative research study was to describe clinical shoulder complex range of motion (ROM) measures for a young, healthy, and physically active population. This investigation represents a cross-sectional experiment conducted at a military academy-based sports medicine center. Military cadets with no history of shoulder complex injury were assessed within two months of enrollment in the academy; 548 men (18.8 ± 1.0 yr, 75.2 ± 12.2 kg, 178.3 ± 7.4 cm) and 74 women (18.7 ± 0.9 yr, 63.2 ± 8.9 kg, 165.2 ± 6.9 cm) participated. Descriptive measures included cross-body adduction (CAD), flexion (FLX), external rotation (ER0) with the shoulder complex in adduction and elbow flexed to 90°, internal and external rotation (IR, ER) with the shoulder complex at 90° of abduction and elbow flexed to 90° as well as arc (ARC) of IR-ER using standardized clinical quantification techniques. Bilateral and sex differences were evaluated using dependent and independent t-tests, respectively. Percentiles by arm dominance and sex were also calculated for all ROM measures. RESULTS: Data were normally distributed. Active and passive ROM measures indicated significant bilateral differences (P < 0.05) except for ARC. Sex differences (P < 0.05) were noted for active and passive CAD, FLX and ER0 for the dominant arm as well as active and passive CAD, FLX and ARC for the non-dominant arm. CONCLUSIONS: These original data provide descriptive measures for shoulder complex ROM excursions, assisting sports medicine practitioners in potentially identifying clinical deficiencies and functional outcomes following shoulder injury. BioMed Central 2012-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3475119/ /pubmed/22964130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-2555-4-33 Text en Copyright ©2012 Vairo et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Report
Vairo, Giampietr L
Duffey, Michele L
Owens, Brett D
Cameron, Kenneth L
Clinical descriptive measures of shoulder range of motion for a healthy, young and physically active cohort
title Clinical descriptive measures of shoulder range of motion for a healthy, young and physically active cohort
title_full Clinical descriptive measures of shoulder range of motion for a healthy, young and physically active cohort
title_fullStr Clinical descriptive measures of shoulder range of motion for a healthy, young and physically active cohort
title_full_unstemmed Clinical descriptive measures of shoulder range of motion for a healthy, young and physically active cohort
title_short Clinical descriptive measures of shoulder range of motion for a healthy, young and physically active cohort
title_sort clinical descriptive measures of shoulder range of motion for a healthy, young and physically active cohort
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3475119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22964130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-2555-4-33
work_keys_str_mv AT vairogiampietrl clinicaldescriptivemeasuresofshoulderrangeofmotionforahealthyyoungandphysicallyactivecohort
AT duffeymichelel clinicaldescriptivemeasuresofshoulderrangeofmotionforahealthyyoungandphysicallyactivecohort
AT owensbrettd clinicaldescriptivemeasuresofshoulderrangeofmotionforahealthyyoungandphysicallyactivecohort
AT cameronkennethl clinicaldescriptivemeasuresofshoulderrangeofmotionforahealthyyoungandphysicallyactivecohort