Cargando…

Cranial base and maxillary changes in patients treated with Frankel’s functional regulator (1b)

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess cranial base and maxillary growth in patients with Class II-type I malocclusions when treated with Frankel’s functional regulator (FR-1b). Study Design: The treatment group was made up of 43 patients that were divided into two groups: prepubescent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alió-Sanz, Juan J., Iglesias-Conde, Carmen, Lorenzo-Pernía, Jose, Iglesias-Linares, Alejandro, Mendoza-Mendoza, Asunción, Solano-Reina, Enrique
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3476035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22322486
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.17631
_version_ 1782247033888833536
author Alió-Sanz, Juan J.
Iglesias-Conde, Carmen
Lorenzo-Pernía, Jose
Iglesias-Linares, Alejandro
Mendoza-Mendoza, Asunción
Solano-Reina, Enrique
author_facet Alió-Sanz, Juan J.
Iglesias-Conde, Carmen
Lorenzo-Pernía, Jose
Iglesias-Linares, Alejandro
Mendoza-Mendoza, Asunción
Solano-Reina, Enrique
author_sort Alió-Sanz, Juan J.
collection PubMed
description Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess cranial base and maxillary growth in patients with Class II-type I malocclusions when treated with Frankel’s functional regulator (FR-1b). Study Design: The treatment group was made up of 43 patients that were divided into two groups: prepubescent (n: 28), and pubescent (n: 15). The control group included 40 patients who did not receive any kind of treatment and were likewise divided into a prepubescent group (n: 19), and a pubescent group (n: 21). A computerized cephalometric study was carried out and superimpositions were done in order to assess the antero-posterior, vertical and rotational movement of the maxilla. Results: The results indicate that anterior cranial length is not affected by the regulator but the cranial deflection of the treatment group was diminished. Although a slight counterclockwise rotation effect on the upper jaw was observed due to treatment, no growth restriction of the maxilla in a vertical or antero-posterior direction was observed compared to other non-treated Class II-type I malocclusion patients. Conclusion: The functional regulator does not have any effect on anterior cranial length, but it does affect the angulation of the cranial base. According to our results, the appliance has demonstrated a flattening effect of the cranial base (p<0.05) in the treated sample. The functional regulator induces counterclockwise rotation rather than vertical or sagittal changes in the maxilla. Key words:Orthodontics, frankel regulator, class II treatment, cephalometry, superimposition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3476035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34760352012-10-19 Cranial base and maxillary changes in patients treated with Frankel’s functional regulator (1b) Alió-Sanz, Juan J. Iglesias-Conde, Carmen Lorenzo-Pernía, Jose Iglesias-Linares, Alejandro Mendoza-Mendoza, Asunción Solano-Reina, Enrique Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal Research-Article Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess cranial base and maxillary growth in patients with Class II-type I malocclusions when treated with Frankel’s functional regulator (FR-1b). Study Design: The treatment group was made up of 43 patients that were divided into two groups: prepubescent (n: 28), and pubescent (n: 15). The control group included 40 patients who did not receive any kind of treatment and were likewise divided into a prepubescent group (n: 19), and a pubescent group (n: 21). A computerized cephalometric study was carried out and superimpositions were done in order to assess the antero-posterior, vertical and rotational movement of the maxilla. Results: The results indicate that anterior cranial length is not affected by the regulator but the cranial deflection of the treatment group was diminished. Although a slight counterclockwise rotation effect on the upper jaw was observed due to treatment, no growth restriction of the maxilla in a vertical or antero-posterior direction was observed compared to other non-treated Class II-type I malocclusion patients. Conclusion: The functional regulator does not have any effect on anterior cranial length, but it does affect the angulation of the cranial base. According to our results, the appliance has demonstrated a flattening effect of the cranial base (p<0.05) in the treated sample. The functional regulator induces counterclockwise rotation rather than vertical or sagittal changes in the maxilla. Key words:Orthodontics, frankel regulator, class II treatment, cephalometry, superimposition. Medicina Oral S.L. 2012-07 2012-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3476035/ /pubmed/22322486 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.17631 Text en Copyright: © 2012 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research-Article
Alió-Sanz, Juan J.
Iglesias-Conde, Carmen
Lorenzo-Pernía, Jose
Iglesias-Linares, Alejandro
Mendoza-Mendoza, Asunción
Solano-Reina, Enrique
Cranial base and maxillary changes in patients treated with Frankel’s functional regulator (1b)
title Cranial base and maxillary changes in patients treated with Frankel’s functional regulator (1b)
title_full Cranial base and maxillary changes in patients treated with Frankel’s functional regulator (1b)
title_fullStr Cranial base and maxillary changes in patients treated with Frankel’s functional regulator (1b)
title_full_unstemmed Cranial base and maxillary changes in patients treated with Frankel’s functional regulator (1b)
title_short Cranial base and maxillary changes in patients treated with Frankel’s functional regulator (1b)
title_sort cranial base and maxillary changes in patients treated with frankel’s functional regulator (1b)
topic Research-Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3476035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22322486
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.17631
work_keys_str_mv AT aliosanzjuanj cranialbaseandmaxillarychangesinpatientstreatedwithfrankelsfunctionalregulator1b
AT iglesiascondecarmen cranialbaseandmaxillarychangesinpatientstreatedwithfrankelsfunctionalregulator1b
AT lorenzoperniajose cranialbaseandmaxillarychangesinpatientstreatedwithfrankelsfunctionalregulator1b
AT iglesiaslinaresalejandro cranialbaseandmaxillarychangesinpatientstreatedwithfrankelsfunctionalregulator1b
AT mendozamendozaasuncion cranialbaseandmaxillarychangesinpatientstreatedwithfrankelsfunctionalregulator1b
AT solanoreinaenrique cranialbaseandmaxillarychangesinpatientstreatedwithfrankelsfunctionalregulator1b