Cargando…
Intraosseous anesthesia with solution injection controlled by a computerized system versus conventional oral anesthesia: A preliminary study
Objective: To compare a computerized intraosseous anesthesia system with the conventional oral anesthesia techniques, and analyze the latency and duration of the anesthetic effect and patient preference. Design: A simple-blind prospective study was made between March 2007 and May 2008. Each patient...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medicina Oral S.L.
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3476101/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22143722 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.17543 |
_version_ | 1782247045790171136 |
---|---|
author | Beneito-Brotons, Rut Peñarrocha-Oltra, David Ata-Ali, Javier Peñarrocha, María |
author_facet | Beneito-Brotons, Rut Peñarrocha-Oltra, David Ata-Ali, Javier Peñarrocha, María |
author_sort | Beneito-Brotons, Rut |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To compare a computerized intraosseous anesthesia system with the conventional oral anesthesia techniques, and analyze the latency and duration of the anesthetic effect and patient preference. Design: A simple-blind prospective study was made between March 2007 and May 2008. Each patient was subjected to two anesthetic techniques: conventional and intraosseous using the Quicksleeper® system (DHT, Cholet, France). A split-mouth design was adopted in which each patient underwent treatment of a tooth with one of the techniques, and treatment of the homologous contralateral tooth with the other technique. The treatments consisted of restorations, endodontic procedures and simple extractions. Results: The study series comprised 12 females and 18 males with a mean age of 36.8 years. The 30 subjects underwent a total of 60 anesthetic procedures. Intraosseous and conventional oral anesthesia caused discomfort during administration in 46.3% and 32.1% of the patients, respectively. The latency was 7.1±2.23 minutes for the conventional technique and 0.48±0.32 for intraosseous anesthesia – the difference being statistically significant. The depth of the anesthetic effect was sufficient to allow the patients to tolerate the dental treatments. The duration of the anesthetic effect in soft tissues was 199.3 minutes with the conventional technique versus only 1.6 minutes with intraosseous anesthesia – the difference between the two techniques being statistically significant. Most of the patients (69.7%) preferred intraosseous anesthesia. Conclusions: The described intraosseous anesthetic system is effective, with a much shorter latency than the conventional technique, sufficient duration of anesthesia to perform the required dental treatments, and with a much lesser soft tissue anesthetic effect. Most of the patients preferred intraosseous anesthesia. Key words:Anesthesia, intraosseous, oral anesthesia, infiltrating, mandibular block, Quicksleeper®. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3476101 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Medicina Oral S.L. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34761012012-10-19 Intraosseous anesthesia with solution injection controlled by a computerized system versus conventional oral anesthesia: A preliminary study Beneito-Brotons, Rut Peñarrocha-Oltra, David Ata-Ali, Javier Peñarrocha, María Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal Research-Article Objective: To compare a computerized intraosseous anesthesia system with the conventional oral anesthesia techniques, and analyze the latency and duration of the anesthetic effect and patient preference. Design: A simple-blind prospective study was made between March 2007 and May 2008. Each patient was subjected to two anesthetic techniques: conventional and intraosseous using the Quicksleeper® system (DHT, Cholet, France). A split-mouth design was adopted in which each patient underwent treatment of a tooth with one of the techniques, and treatment of the homologous contralateral tooth with the other technique. The treatments consisted of restorations, endodontic procedures and simple extractions. Results: The study series comprised 12 females and 18 males with a mean age of 36.8 years. The 30 subjects underwent a total of 60 anesthetic procedures. Intraosseous and conventional oral anesthesia caused discomfort during administration in 46.3% and 32.1% of the patients, respectively. The latency was 7.1±2.23 minutes for the conventional technique and 0.48±0.32 for intraosseous anesthesia – the difference being statistically significant. The depth of the anesthetic effect was sufficient to allow the patients to tolerate the dental treatments. The duration of the anesthetic effect in soft tissues was 199.3 minutes with the conventional technique versus only 1.6 minutes with intraosseous anesthesia – the difference between the two techniques being statistically significant. Most of the patients (69.7%) preferred intraosseous anesthesia. Conclusions: The described intraosseous anesthetic system is effective, with a much shorter latency than the conventional technique, sufficient duration of anesthesia to perform the required dental treatments, and with a much lesser soft tissue anesthetic effect. Most of the patients preferred intraosseous anesthesia. Key words:Anesthesia, intraosseous, oral anesthesia, infiltrating, mandibular block, Quicksleeper®. Medicina Oral S.L. 2012-05 2011-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3476101/ /pubmed/22143722 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.17543 Text en Copyright: © 2012 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research-Article Beneito-Brotons, Rut Peñarrocha-Oltra, David Ata-Ali, Javier Peñarrocha, María Intraosseous anesthesia with solution injection controlled by a computerized system versus conventional oral anesthesia: A preliminary study |
title | Intraosseous anesthesia with solution injection controlled by a computerized system versus conventional oral anesthesia: A preliminary study |
title_full | Intraosseous anesthesia with solution injection controlled by a computerized system versus conventional oral anesthesia: A preliminary study |
title_fullStr | Intraosseous anesthesia with solution injection controlled by a computerized system versus conventional oral anesthesia: A preliminary study |
title_full_unstemmed | Intraosseous anesthesia with solution injection controlled by a computerized system versus conventional oral anesthesia: A preliminary study |
title_short | Intraosseous anesthesia with solution injection controlled by a computerized system versus conventional oral anesthesia: A preliminary study |
title_sort | intraosseous anesthesia with solution injection controlled by a computerized system versus conventional oral anesthesia: a preliminary study |
topic | Research-Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3476101/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22143722 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.17543 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beneitobrotonsrut intraosseousanesthesiawithsolutioninjectioncontrolledbyacomputerizedsystemversusconventionaloralanesthesiaapreliminarystudy AT penarrochaoltradavid intraosseousanesthesiawithsolutioninjectioncontrolledbyacomputerizedsystemversusconventionaloralanesthesiaapreliminarystudy AT ataalijavier intraosseousanesthesiawithsolutioninjectioncontrolledbyacomputerizedsystemversusconventionaloralanesthesiaapreliminarystudy AT penarrochamaria intraosseousanesthesiawithsolutioninjectioncontrolledbyacomputerizedsystemversusconventionaloralanesthesiaapreliminarystudy |