Cargando…
Bupivacaine 0.5 % versus articaine 4 % for the removal of lower third molars. A crossover randomized controlled trial
Objective: To compare the anesthetic action of 0.5% bupivacaine in relation to 4% articaine, both with 1:200,000 epinephrine, in the surgical removal of lower third molars. As a secondary objective hemodynamic changes using both anesthetics were analyzed. Study Design: Triple-blind crossover randomi...
Autores principales: | Sancho-Puchades, Manuel, Vílchez-Pérez, Miguel A., Valmaseda-Castellón, Eduard, Paredes-García, Jordi, Berini-Aytés, Leonardo, Gay-Escoda, Cosme |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medicina Oral S.L.
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3476102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22143739 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.17628 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A prospective, randomized, triple-blind comparison of
articaine and bupivacaine for maxillary infiltrations
por: Vílchez-Pérez, Miguel A., et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Quality of life following third molar removal under conscious sedation
por: Sancho-Puchades, Manuel, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Sensibility and taste alterations after impacted lower third
molar extractions. A prospective cohort study
por: Ridaura-Ruiz, Lourdes, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Sharp mandibular bone irregularities after lower third molar
extraction: Incidence, clinical features and risk factors
por: Alves-Pereira, Daniela, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Impacted lower third molars and distal caries in the mandibular second molar. Is prophylactic removal of lower third molars justified?
por: Marques, José, et al.
Publicado: (2017)