Cargando…
Parenteral vs. oral sumatriptan and naratriptan: plasma levels and efficacy in migraine. A comment
The clinical efficacy in migraine was compared for oral and subcutaneous sumatriptan and naratriptan. Doses of the two administration forms were chosen as resulting in comparable blood concentrations. Subcutaneous administrations of the drugs were superior for efficacy than the oral forms. This most...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3476154/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17955173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10194-007-0411-x |
_version_ | 1782247060693581824 |
---|---|
author | Tfelt-Hansen, Peer |
author_facet | Tfelt-Hansen, Peer |
author_sort | Tfelt-Hansen, Peer |
collection | PubMed |
description | The clinical efficacy in migraine was compared for oral and subcutaneous sumatriptan and naratriptan. Doses of the two administration forms were chosen as resulting in comparable blood concentrations. Subcutaneous administrations of the drugs were superior for efficacy than the oral forms. This most likely due to a quicker rise in blood concentrations after subcutaneous injections.. In designing new therapies for migraine one should aim at a quick absorption of the drug, which will probably result in an increased efficacy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3476154 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34761542012-11-29 Parenteral vs. oral sumatriptan and naratriptan: plasma levels and efficacy in migraine. A comment Tfelt-Hansen, Peer J Headache Pain Comment The clinical efficacy in migraine was compared for oral and subcutaneous sumatriptan and naratriptan. Doses of the two administration forms were chosen as resulting in comparable blood concentrations. Subcutaneous administrations of the drugs were superior for efficacy than the oral forms. This most likely due to a quicker rise in blood concentrations after subcutaneous injections.. In designing new therapies for migraine one should aim at a quick absorption of the drug, which will probably result in an increased efficacy. Springer-Verlag 2007-10-23 2007-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3476154/ /pubmed/17955173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10194-007-0411-x Text en © Springer-Verlag Italia 2007 |
spellingShingle | Comment Tfelt-Hansen, Peer Parenteral vs. oral sumatriptan and naratriptan: plasma levels and efficacy in migraine. A comment |
title | Parenteral vs. oral sumatriptan and naratriptan: plasma levels and efficacy in migraine. A comment |
title_full | Parenteral vs. oral sumatriptan and naratriptan: plasma levels and efficacy in migraine. A comment |
title_fullStr | Parenteral vs. oral sumatriptan and naratriptan: plasma levels and efficacy in migraine. A comment |
title_full_unstemmed | Parenteral vs. oral sumatriptan and naratriptan: plasma levels and efficacy in migraine. A comment |
title_short | Parenteral vs. oral sumatriptan and naratriptan: plasma levels and efficacy in migraine. A comment |
title_sort | parenteral vs. oral sumatriptan and naratriptan: plasma levels and efficacy in migraine. a comment |
topic | Comment |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3476154/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17955173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10194-007-0411-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tfelthansenpeer parenteralvsoralsumatriptanandnaratriptanplasmalevelsandefficacyinmigraineacomment |