Cargando…

Cinnarizine in refractory migraine prophylaxis: efficacy and tolerability. A comparison with sodium valproate

This was a double-blind clinical trial designed to assess the efficacy and safety of the cinnarizine (CIN) in patients with migraine who were refractory to propranolol and tricyclic antidepressants in comparison with sodium valproate (SV) to investigate whether CIN could be at least as effective as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mansoureh, Togha, Rahmat Jirde, Masoud, Nilavari, Kiafar, Ashrafian, Hosein, Razeghi, Soodeh, Kohan, Leila
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3476188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18286231
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10194-008-0013-2
_version_ 1782247069482745856
author Mansoureh, Togha
Rahmat Jirde, Masoud
Nilavari, Kiafar
Ashrafian, Hosein
Razeghi, Soodeh
Kohan, Leila
author_facet Mansoureh, Togha
Rahmat Jirde, Masoud
Nilavari, Kiafar
Ashrafian, Hosein
Razeghi, Soodeh
Kohan, Leila
author_sort Mansoureh, Togha
collection PubMed
description This was a double-blind clinical trial designed to assess the efficacy and safety of the cinnarizine (CIN) in patients with migraine who were refractory to propranolol and tricyclic antidepressants in comparison with sodium valproate (SV) to investigate whether CIN could be at least as effective as SV. A total of 125 patients were treated in a treatment period of 12 weeks. All patients had at least one intake of trial medication and 2-week post baseline efficacy observation which all were included in the ITT analysis. Of the 125 subjects treated, 46 discontinued prematurely: 25 from the CIN and 21 from the SV group. The main reasons for premature discontinuation were: lost to follow up (25/46, 63.2%), insufficient response (16/46, 20%), and adverse events (5/46, 12.8%). No statistically significant inter-group differences in the number of discontinuation was observed (p > 0.05). In both groups, number of attacks, intensity, and duration of attacks significantly decreased (p < 0.05). No statistically significant inter-group differences were observed regarding the mean number of attacks, duration, and intensity of migraine attacks for any of the time intervals analysed, except for the mean reduction of third and fourth visits intensity from baseline which were significantly different in two groups (p < 0.05), with the CIN group showing more reduction. Analysis of the number of responders showed that in the CIN group 61.2% subjects were responders, and 63.8% in the SV group. No statistically significant differences between the treatment groups were found for any of the secondary parameters. Overall 26 subjects reported one or more adverse events during the study period: 13 subjects in each group. Five subjects discontinued prematurely due to adverse events; two in the CIN group with significant weight gain, and 3 in the SV group with significant weight gain and severe tremor. These results suggest that CIN is an effective and safe prophylactic agent even in severe migraine headache.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3476188
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34761882012-11-29 Cinnarizine in refractory migraine prophylaxis: efficacy and tolerability. A comparison with sodium valproate Mansoureh, Togha Rahmat Jirde, Masoud Nilavari, Kiafar Ashrafian, Hosein Razeghi, Soodeh Kohan, Leila J Headache Pain Original This was a double-blind clinical trial designed to assess the efficacy and safety of the cinnarizine (CIN) in patients with migraine who were refractory to propranolol and tricyclic antidepressants in comparison with sodium valproate (SV) to investigate whether CIN could be at least as effective as SV. A total of 125 patients were treated in a treatment period of 12 weeks. All patients had at least one intake of trial medication and 2-week post baseline efficacy observation which all were included in the ITT analysis. Of the 125 subjects treated, 46 discontinued prematurely: 25 from the CIN and 21 from the SV group. The main reasons for premature discontinuation were: lost to follow up (25/46, 63.2%), insufficient response (16/46, 20%), and adverse events (5/46, 12.8%). No statistically significant inter-group differences in the number of discontinuation was observed (p > 0.05). In both groups, number of attacks, intensity, and duration of attacks significantly decreased (p < 0.05). No statistically significant inter-group differences were observed regarding the mean number of attacks, duration, and intensity of migraine attacks for any of the time intervals analysed, except for the mean reduction of third and fourth visits intensity from baseline which were significantly different in two groups (p < 0.05), with the CIN group showing more reduction. Analysis of the number of responders showed that in the CIN group 61.2% subjects were responders, and 63.8% in the SV group. No statistically significant differences between the treatment groups were found for any of the secondary parameters. Overall 26 subjects reported one or more adverse events during the study period: 13 subjects in each group. Five subjects discontinued prematurely due to adverse events; two in the CIN group with significant weight gain, and 3 in the SV group with significant weight gain and severe tremor. These results suggest that CIN is an effective and safe prophylactic agent even in severe migraine headache. Springer Milan 2008-02-20 2008-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3476188/ /pubmed/18286231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10194-008-0013-2 Text en © Springer-Verlag 2008
spellingShingle Original
Mansoureh, Togha
Rahmat Jirde, Masoud
Nilavari, Kiafar
Ashrafian, Hosein
Razeghi, Soodeh
Kohan, Leila
Cinnarizine in refractory migraine prophylaxis: efficacy and tolerability. A comparison with sodium valproate
title Cinnarizine in refractory migraine prophylaxis: efficacy and tolerability. A comparison with sodium valproate
title_full Cinnarizine in refractory migraine prophylaxis: efficacy and tolerability. A comparison with sodium valproate
title_fullStr Cinnarizine in refractory migraine prophylaxis: efficacy and tolerability. A comparison with sodium valproate
title_full_unstemmed Cinnarizine in refractory migraine prophylaxis: efficacy and tolerability. A comparison with sodium valproate
title_short Cinnarizine in refractory migraine prophylaxis: efficacy and tolerability. A comparison with sodium valproate
title_sort cinnarizine in refractory migraine prophylaxis: efficacy and tolerability. a comparison with sodium valproate
topic Original
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3476188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18286231
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10194-008-0013-2
work_keys_str_mv AT mansourehtogha cinnarizineinrefractorymigraineprophylaxisefficacyandtolerabilityacomparisonwithsodiumvalproate
AT rahmatjirdemasoud cinnarizineinrefractorymigraineprophylaxisefficacyandtolerabilityacomparisonwithsodiumvalproate
AT nilavarikiafar cinnarizineinrefractorymigraineprophylaxisefficacyandtolerabilityacomparisonwithsodiumvalproate
AT ashrafianhosein cinnarizineinrefractorymigraineprophylaxisefficacyandtolerabilityacomparisonwithsodiumvalproate
AT razeghisoodeh cinnarizineinrefractorymigraineprophylaxisefficacyandtolerabilityacomparisonwithsodiumvalproate
AT kohanleila cinnarizineinrefractorymigraineprophylaxisefficacyandtolerabilityacomparisonwithsodiumvalproate