Cargando…

Treatment of recurrent trigeminal neuralgia due to Teflon granuloma

Recurrent trigeminal neuralgia after microvascular decompression (MVD) may be due to insufficient decompression, dislocation of the implant to pad the neurovascular contact, or the development of granuloma. Here, we report on our experience with Teflon granuloma including its treatment and histopath...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Capelle, Hans-Holger, Brandis, Almuth, Tschan, Christoph A., Krauss, Joachim K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3476345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20419329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10194-010-0213-4
_version_ 1782247084596920320
author Capelle, Hans-Holger
Brandis, Almuth
Tschan, Christoph A.
Krauss, Joachim K.
author_facet Capelle, Hans-Holger
Brandis, Almuth
Tschan, Christoph A.
Krauss, Joachim K.
author_sort Capelle, Hans-Holger
collection PubMed
description Recurrent trigeminal neuralgia after microvascular decompression (MVD) may be due to insufficient decompression, dislocation of the implant to pad the neurovascular contact, or the development of granuloma. Here, we report on our experience with Teflon granuloma including its treatment and histopathological examination. In a series of 200 patients with trigeminal neuralgia MVD was performed with Teflon felt according to Jannetta’s technique. In three patients with recurrent facial pain Teflon granuloma was found to be the cause for recurrence. In each instance, the granuloma was removed for histopathological examination. Mean age at the first procedure was 62.3 years and at the second procedure 66.3 years. Recurrence of pain occurred between 1 and 8.5 years after the first procedure. MRI scans demonstrated local gadolineum enhancement in the cerebellopontine angle, and CT scans showed local calcification. Intraoperatively dense fibrous tissue was found at the site of the Teflon granuloma. Histopathological examination revealed foreign body granuloma with multinuclear giant cells, collagen-rich hyalinized scar tissue, focal hemosiderin depositions, and microcalcifications. The Teflon granuloma was completely removed, and a new Teflon felt was used for re-decompression. Patients were free of pain after the second procedure at a mean of 40.3 months of follow-up. Teflon granuloma is a rare cause for recurrent facial pain after MVD. Small bleeding into the Teflon felt at surgery might trigger its development. A feasible treatment option is surgical re-exploration, nerve preserving removal of the granuloma, and repeat MVD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3476345
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34763452012-11-29 Treatment of recurrent trigeminal neuralgia due to Teflon granuloma Capelle, Hans-Holger Brandis, Almuth Tschan, Christoph A. Krauss, Joachim K. J Headache Pain Original Recurrent trigeminal neuralgia after microvascular decompression (MVD) may be due to insufficient decompression, dislocation of the implant to pad the neurovascular contact, or the development of granuloma. Here, we report on our experience with Teflon granuloma including its treatment and histopathological examination. In a series of 200 patients with trigeminal neuralgia MVD was performed with Teflon felt according to Jannetta’s technique. In three patients with recurrent facial pain Teflon granuloma was found to be the cause for recurrence. In each instance, the granuloma was removed for histopathological examination. Mean age at the first procedure was 62.3 years and at the second procedure 66.3 years. Recurrence of pain occurred between 1 and 8.5 years after the first procedure. MRI scans demonstrated local gadolineum enhancement in the cerebellopontine angle, and CT scans showed local calcification. Intraoperatively dense fibrous tissue was found at the site of the Teflon granuloma. Histopathological examination revealed foreign body granuloma with multinuclear giant cells, collagen-rich hyalinized scar tissue, focal hemosiderin depositions, and microcalcifications. The Teflon granuloma was completely removed, and a new Teflon felt was used for re-decompression. Patients were free of pain after the second procedure at a mean of 40.3 months of follow-up. Teflon granuloma is a rare cause for recurrent facial pain after MVD. Small bleeding into the Teflon felt at surgery might trigger its development. A feasible treatment option is surgical re-exploration, nerve preserving removal of the granuloma, and repeat MVD. Springer Milan 2010-04-24 2010-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3476345/ /pubmed/20419329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10194-010-0213-4 Text en © Springer-Verlag 2010
spellingShingle Original
Capelle, Hans-Holger
Brandis, Almuth
Tschan, Christoph A.
Krauss, Joachim K.
Treatment of recurrent trigeminal neuralgia due to Teflon granuloma
title Treatment of recurrent trigeminal neuralgia due to Teflon granuloma
title_full Treatment of recurrent trigeminal neuralgia due to Teflon granuloma
title_fullStr Treatment of recurrent trigeminal neuralgia due to Teflon granuloma
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of recurrent trigeminal neuralgia due to Teflon granuloma
title_short Treatment of recurrent trigeminal neuralgia due to Teflon granuloma
title_sort treatment of recurrent trigeminal neuralgia due to teflon granuloma
topic Original
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3476345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20419329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10194-010-0213-4
work_keys_str_mv AT capellehansholger treatmentofrecurrenttrigeminalneuralgiaduetoteflongranuloma
AT brandisalmuth treatmentofrecurrenttrigeminalneuralgiaduetoteflongranuloma
AT tschanchristopha treatmentofrecurrenttrigeminalneuralgiaduetoteflongranuloma
AT kraussjoachimk treatmentofrecurrenttrigeminalneuralgiaduetoteflongranuloma