Cargando…

Computed Tomography-guided Time-domain Diffuse Fluorescence Tomography in Small Animals for Localization of Cancer Biomarkers

Small animal fluorescence molecular imaging (FMI) can be a powerful tool for preclinical drug discovery and development studies(1). However, light absorption by tissue chromophores (e.g., hemoglobin, water, lipids, melanin) typically limits optical signal propagation through thicknesses larger than...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tichauer, Kenneth M., Holt, Robert W., Samkoe, Kimberley S., El-Ghussein, Fadi, Gunn, Jason R., Jermyn, Michael, Dehghani, Hamid, Leblond, Frederic, Pogue, Brian W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MyJove Corporation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3476420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22847515
http://dx.doi.org/10.3791/4050
_version_ 1782247096124964864
author Tichauer, Kenneth M.
Holt, Robert W.
Samkoe, Kimberley S.
El-Ghussein, Fadi
Gunn, Jason R.
Jermyn, Michael
Dehghani, Hamid
Leblond, Frederic
Pogue, Brian W.
author_facet Tichauer, Kenneth M.
Holt, Robert W.
Samkoe, Kimberley S.
El-Ghussein, Fadi
Gunn, Jason R.
Jermyn, Michael
Dehghani, Hamid
Leblond, Frederic
Pogue, Brian W.
author_sort Tichauer, Kenneth M.
collection PubMed
description Small animal fluorescence molecular imaging (FMI) can be a powerful tool for preclinical drug discovery and development studies(1). However, light absorption by tissue chromophores (e.g., hemoglobin, water, lipids, melanin) typically limits optical signal propagation through thicknesses larger than a few millimeters(2). Compared to other visible wavelengths, tissue absorption for red and near-infrared (near-IR) light absorption dramatically decreases and non-elastic scattering becomes the dominant light-tissue interaction mechanism. The relatively recent development of fluorescent agents that absorb and emit light in the near-IR range (600-1000 nm), has driven the development of imaging systems and light propagation models that can achieve whole body three-dimensional imaging in small animals(3). Despite great strides in this area, the ill-posed nature of diffuse fluorescence tomography remains a significant problem for the stability, contrast recovery and spatial resolution of image reconstruction techniques and the optimal approach to FMI in small animals has yet to be agreed on. The majority of research groups have invested in charge-coupled device (CCD)-based systems that provide abundant tissue-sampling but suboptimal sensitivity(4-9), while our group and a few others(10-13) have pursued systems based on very high sensitivity detectors, that at this time allow dense tissue sampling to be achieved only at the cost of low imaging throughput. Here we demonstrate the methodology for applying single-photon detection technology in a fluorescence tomography system to localize a cancerous brain lesion in a mouse model. The fluorescence tomography (FT) system employed single photon counting using photomultiplier tubes (PMT) and information-rich time-domain light detection in a non-contact conformation(11). This provides a simultaneous collection of transmitted excitation and emission light, and includes automatic fluorescence excitation exposure control(14), laser referencing, and co-registration with a small animal computed tomography (microCT) system(15). A nude mouse model was used for imaging. The animal was inoculated orthotopically with a human glioma cell line (U251) in the left cerebral hemisphere and imaged 2 weeks later. The tumor was made to fluoresce by injecting a fluorescent tracer, IRDye 800CW-EGF (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE) targeted to epidermal growth factor receptor, a cell membrane protein known to be overexpressed in the U251 tumor line and many other cancers(18). A second, untargeted fluorescent tracer, Alexa Fluor 647 (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) was also injected to account for non-receptor mediated effects on the uptake of the targeted tracers to provide a means of quantifying tracer binding and receptor availability/density(27). A CT-guided, time-domain algorithm was used to reconstruct the location of both fluorescent tracers (i.e., the location of the tumor) in the mouse brain and their ability to localize the tumor was verified by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Though demonstrated for fluorescence imaging in a glioma mouse model, the methodology presented in this video can be extended to different tumor models in various small animal models potentially up to the size of a rat(17).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3476420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher MyJove Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34764202012-10-24 Computed Tomography-guided Time-domain Diffuse Fluorescence Tomography in Small Animals for Localization of Cancer Biomarkers Tichauer, Kenneth M. Holt, Robert W. Samkoe, Kimberley S. El-Ghussein, Fadi Gunn, Jason R. Jermyn, Michael Dehghani, Hamid Leblond, Frederic Pogue, Brian W. J Vis Exp Cancer Biology Small animal fluorescence molecular imaging (FMI) can be a powerful tool for preclinical drug discovery and development studies(1). However, light absorption by tissue chromophores (e.g., hemoglobin, water, lipids, melanin) typically limits optical signal propagation through thicknesses larger than a few millimeters(2). Compared to other visible wavelengths, tissue absorption for red and near-infrared (near-IR) light absorption dramatically decreases and non-elastic scattering becomes the dominant light-tissue interaction mechanism. The relatively recent development of fluorescent agents that absorb and emit light in the near-IR range (600-1000 nm), has driven the development of imaging systems and light propagation models that can achieve whole body three-dimensional imaging in small animals(3). Despite great strides in this area, the ill-posed nature of diffuse fluorescence tomography remains a significant problem for the stability, contrast recovery and spatial resolution of image reconstruction techniques and the optimal approach to FMI in small animals has yet to be agreed on. The majority of research groups have invested in charge-coupled device (CCD)-based systems that provide abundant tissue-sampling but suboptimal sensitivity(4-9), while our group and a few others(10-13) have pursued systems based on very high sensitivity detectors, that at this time allow dense tissue sampling to be achieved only at the cost of low imaging throughput. Here we demonstrate the methodology for applying single-photon detection technology in a fluorescence tomography system to localize a cancerous brain lesion in a mouse model. The fluorescence tomography (FT) system employed single photon counting using photomultiplier tubes (PMT) and information-rich time-domain light detection in a non-contact conformation(11). This provides a simultaneous collection of transmitted excitation and emission light, and includes automatic fluorescence excitation exposure control(14), laser referencing, and co-registration with a small animal computed tomography (microCT) system(15). A nude mouse model was used for imaging. The animal was inoculated orthotopically with a human glioma cell line (U251) in the left cerebral hemisphere and imaged 2 weeks later. The tumor was made to fluoresce by injecting a fluorescent tracer, IRDye 800CW-EGF (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE) targeted to epidermal growth factor receptor, a cell membrane protein known to be overexpressed in the U251 tumor line and many other cancers(18). A second, untargeted fluorescent tracer, Alexa Fluor 647 (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) was also injected to account for non-receptor mediated effects on the uptake of the targeted tracers to provide a means of quantifying tracer binding and receptor availability/density(27). A CT-guided, time-domain algorithm was used to reconstruct the location of both fluorescent tracers (i.e., the location of the tumor) in the mouse brain and their ability to localize the tumor was verified by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Though demonstrated for fluorescence imaging in a glioma mouse model, the methodology presented in this video can be extended to different tumor models in various small animal models potentially up to the size of a rat(17). MyJove Corporation 2012-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3476420/ /pubmed/22847515 http://dx.doi.org/10.3791/4050 Text en Copyright © 2012, Journal of Visualized Experiments http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
spellingShingle Cancer Biology
Tichauer, Kenneth M.
Holt, Robert W.
Samkoe, Kimberley S.
El-Ghussein, Fadi
Gunn, Jason R.
Jermyn, Michael
Dehghani, Hamid
Leblond, Frederic
Pogue, Brian W.
Computed Tomography-guided Time-domain Diffuse Fluorescence Tomography in Small Animals for Localization of Cancer Biomarkers
title Computed Tomography-guided Time-domain Diffuse Fluorescence Tomography in Small Animals for Localization of Cancer Biomarkers
title_full Computed Tomography-guided Time-domain Diffuse Fluorescence Tomography in Small Animals for Localization of Cancer Biomarkers
title_fullStr Computed Tomography-guided Time-domain Diffuse Fluorescence Tomography in Small Animals for Localization of Cancer Biomarkers
title_full_unstemmed Computed Tomography-guided Time-domain Diffuse Fluorescence Tomography in Small Animals for Localization of Cancer Biomarkers
title_short Computed Tomography-guided Time-domain Diffuse Fluorescence Tomography in Small Animals for Localization of Cancer Biomarkers
title_sort computed tomography-guided time-domain diffuse fluorescence tomography in small animals for localization of cancer biomarkers
topic Cancer Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3476420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22847515
http://dx.doi.org/10.3791/4050
work_keys_str_mv AT tichauerkennethm computedtomographyguidedtimedomaindiffusefluorescencetomographyinsmallanimalsforlocalizationofcancerbiomarkers
AT holtrobertw computedtomographyguidedtimedomaindiffusefluorescencetomographyinsmallanimalsforlocalizationofcancerbiomarkers
AT samkoekimberleys computedtomographyguidedtimedomaindiffusefluorescencetomographyinsmallanimalsforlocalizationofcancerbiomarkers
AT elghusseinfadi computedtomographyguidedtimedomaindiffusefluorescencetomographyinsmallanimalsforlocalizationofcancerbiomarkers
AT gunnjasonr computedtomographyguidedtimedomaindiffusefluorescencetomographyinsmallanimalsforlocalizationofcancerbiomarkers
AT jermynmichael computedtomographyguidedtimedomaindiffusefluorescencetomographyinsmallanimalsforlocalizationofcancerbiomarkers
AT dehghanihamid computedtomographyguidedtimedomaindiffusefluorescencetomographyinsmallanimalsforlocalizationofcancerbiomarkers
AT leblondfrederic computedtomographyguidedtimedomaindiffusefluorescencetomographyinsmallanimalsforlocalizationofcancerbiomarkers
AT poguebrianw computedtomographyguidedtimedomaindiffusefluorescencetomographyinsmallanimalsforlocalizationofcancerbiomarkers