Cargando…

Psychometric Evaluation of the Adherence in Diabetes Questionnaire

OBJECTIVE: To assess the psychometric properties of a short, new, self-administered questionnaire (17–19 items) for evaluating the adherence behavior of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes and their caregivers. This instrument has separate versions depending on the means of insulin adminis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kristensen, Lene J., Thastum, Mikael, Mose, Anne H., Birkebaek, Niels H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3476922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22837365
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc11-2342
_version_ 1782247133613654016
author Kristensen, Lene J.
Thastum, Mikael
Mose, Anne H.
Birkebaek, Niels H.
author_facet Kristensen, Lene J.
Thastum, Mikael
Mose, Anne H.
Birkebaek, Niels H.
author_sort Kristensen, Lene J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the psychometric properties of a short, new, self-administered questionnaire (17–19 items) for evaluating the adherence behavior of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes and their caregivers. This instrument has separate versions depending on the means of insulin administration, i.e., continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (Adherence in Diabetes Questionnaire [ADQ]-I), or conventional insulin injection (ADQ-C). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 1,028 caregivers and 766 children and adolescents 2–17 years of age were recruited through the Danish Registry of Childhood Diabetes and completed the national web survey, including the ADQ and psychosocial measures of self-efficacy, parental support, family conflict, and aspects of diabetes-related quality of life. Blood samples were obtained for central HbA(1c) analysis. The psychometric properties of the ADQ were evaluated, and the association with glycemic control was assessed. RESULTS: There was good internal consistency for both the youth and caregiver reports and strong agreement between the caregiver and youth reports. Higher ADQ scores, indicating better adherence, were associated with better self-efficacy, more parental support, less diabetes-related conflict, and less experience with treatment barriers. Factor analysis supported maintaining the one-factor structure of the ADQ. Higher ADQ scores were associated with lower HbA(1c) levels. CONCLUSIONS: The ADQ showed good psychometric properties. Although the test-retest reliability and sensitivity to change of the instrument still need to be established, the ADQ appears to be a valuable tool for assessing adherence in families with children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes in both clinical and research settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3476922
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher American Diabetes Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34769222013-11-01 Psychometric Evaluation of the Adherence in Diabetes Questionnaire Kristensen, Lene J. Thastum, Mikael Mose, Anne H. Birkebaek, Niels H. Diabetes Care Original Research OBJECTIVE: To assess the psychometric properties of a short, new, self-administered questionnaire (17–19 items) for evaluating the adherence behavior of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes and their caregivers. This instrument has separate versions depending on the means of insulin administration, i.e., continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (Adherence in Diabetes Questionnaire [ADQ]-I), or conventional insulin injection (ADQ-C). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 1,028 caregivers and 766 children and adolescents 2–17 years of age were recruited through the Danish Registry of Childhood Diabetes and completed the national web survey, including the ADQ and psychosocial measures of self-efficacy, parental support, family conflict, and aspects of diabetes-related quality of life. Blood samples were obtained for central HbA(1c) analysis. The psychometric properties of the ADQ were evaluated, and the association with glycemic control was assessed. RESULTS: There was good internal consistency for both the youth and caregiver reports and strong agreement between the caregiver and youth reports. Higher ADQ scores, indicating better adherence, were associated with better self-efficacy, more parental support, less diabetes-related conflict, and less experience with treatment barriers. Factor analysis supported maintaining the one-factor structure of the ADQ. Higher ADQ scores were associated with lower HbA(1c) levels. CONCLUSIONS: The ADQ showed good psychometric properties. Although the test-retest reliability and sensitivity to change of the instrument still need to be established, the ADQ appears to be a valuable tool for assessing adherence in families with children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes in both clinical and research settings. American Diabetes Association 2012-11 2012-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3476922/ /pubmed/22837365 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc11-2342 Text en © 2012 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kristensen, Lene J.
Thastum, Mikael
Mose, Anne H.
Birkebaek, Niels H.
Psychometric Evaluation of the Adherence in Diabetes Questionnaire
title Psychometric Evaluation of the Adherence in Diabetes Questionnaire
title_full Psychometric Evaluation of the Adherence in Diabetes Questionnaire
title_fullStr Psychometric Evaluation of the Adherence in Diabetes Questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric Evaluation of the Adherence in Diabetes Questionnaire
title_short Psychometric Evaluation of the Adherence in Diabetes Questionnaire
title_sort psychometric evaluation of the adherence in diabetes questionnaire
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3476922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22837365
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc11-2342
work_keys_str_mv AT kristensenlenej psychometricevaluationoftheadherenceindiabetesquestionnaire
AT thastummikael psychometricevaluationoftheadherenceindiabetesquestionnaire
AT moseanneh psychometricevaluationoftheadherenceindiabetesquestionnaire
AT birkebaeknielsh psychometricevaluationoftheadherenceindiabetesquestionnaire
AT psychometricevaluationoftheadherenceindiabetesquestionnaire