Cargando…

Effect of Different Host Plants on Nutritional Indices of the Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera

Nutritional indices of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on different host plants including chickpea (cultivars Arman, Hashem, Azad, and Binivich), common bean (cultivar Khomein), white kidney bean (cultivar Dehghan), red kidney bean (cultivar Goli), cowpea (cultivar Mashhad), t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hemati, S.A., Naseri, B., Ganbalani, G. Nouri, Dastjerdi, H. Rafiee, Golizadeh, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: University of Wisconsin Library 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3476957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22963648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1673/031.012.5501
_version_ 1782247142794985472
author Hemati, S.A.
Naseri, B.
Ganbalani, G. Nouri
Dastjerdi, H. Rafiee
Golizadeh, A.
author_facet Hemati, S.A.
Naseri, B.
Ganbalani, G. Nouri
Dastjerdi, H. Rafiee
Golizadeh, A.
author_sort Hemati, S.A.
collection PubMed
description Nutritional indices of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on different host plants including chickpea (cultivars Arman, Hashem, Azad, and Binivich), common bean (cultivar Khomein), white kidney bean (cultivar Dehghan), red kidney bean (cultivar Goli), cowpea (cultivar Mashhad), tomato (cultivar Meshkin) and potato (cultivars Agria and Satina) were studied under laboratory conditions (25 ± 1 °C, 65 ± 5% RH, 16:8 L:D). Third instar larvae reared on potato Agria showed the highest efficiency of conversion of digested food (ECD) and efficiency of conversion of ingested food (ECI) (50.800 é 0.104% and 13.630 ± 0.016%, respectively). Approximate digestibility (AD) values of the fourth instar larvae were highest (92.651 ± 0.004%) and lowest (57.140 — 0.049%) on chickpea Azad and potato Agria, respectively. The fifth instar larvae fed on tomato Meshkin and white kidney bean Dehghan had the highest consumption index (CI) (3.717 ± 0.091) and relative consumption rate (RCR) (1.620 ± 0.074), respectively. Whole larval instars showed the highest ECI and ECD values on potatoes Satina (14.640 ± 0.014%) and Agria (21.380 ± 0.015%), respectively, and the lowest of both values on tomato Meshkin (ECI: 5.748 ± 0.002% and ECD: 7.341 ± 0.002%). The results of nutritional indices and the cluster analysis indicated that tomato Meshkin was an unsuitable host for feeding of H. armigera.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3476957
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher University of Wisconsin Library
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34769572012-10-24 Effect of Different Host Plants on Nutritional Indices of the Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera Hemati, S.A. Naseri, B. Ganbalani, G. Nouri Dastjerdi, H. Rafiee Golizadeh, A. J Insect Sci Article Nutritional indices of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on different host plants including chickpea (cultivars Arman, Hashem, Azad, and Binivich), common bean (cultivar Khomein), white kidney bean (cultivar Dehghan), red kidney bean (cultivar Goli), cowpea (cultivar Mashhad), tomato (cultivar Meshkin) and potato (cultivars Agria and Satina) were studied under laboratory conditions (25 ± 1 °C, 65 ± 5% RH, 16:8 L:D). Third instar larvae reared on potato Agria showed the highest efficiency of conversion of digested food (ECD) and efficiency of conversion of ingested food (ECI) (50.800 é 0.104% and 13.630 ± 0.016%, respectively). Approximate digestibility (AD) values of the fourth instar larvae were highest (92.651 ± 0.004%) and lowest (57.140 — 0.049%) on chickpea Azad and potato Agria, respectively. The fifth instar larvae fed on tomato Meshkin and white kidney bean Dehghan had the highest consumption index (CI) (3.717 ± 0.091) and relative consumption rate (RCR) (1.620 ± 0.074), respectively. Whole larval instars showed the highest ECI and ECD values on potatoes Satina (14.640 ± 0.014%) and Agria (21.380 ± 0.015%), respectively, and the lowest of both values on tomato Meshkin (ECI: 5.748 ± 0.002% and ECD: 7.341 ± 0.002%). The results of nutritional indices and the cluster analysis indicated that tomato Meshkin was an unsuitable host for feeding of H. armigera. University of Wisconsin Library 2012-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3476957/ /pubmed/22963648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1673/031.012.5501 Text en © 2012 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Hemati, S.A.
Naseri, B.
Ganbalani, G. Nouri
Dastjerdi, H. Rafiee
Golizadeh, A.
Effect of Different Host Plants on Nutritional Indices of the Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera
title Effect of Different Host Plants on Nutritional Indices of the Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera
title_full Effect of Different Host Plants on Nutritional Indices of the Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera
title_fullStr Effect of Different Host Plants on Nutritional Indices of the Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Different Host Plants on Nutritional Indices of the Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera
title_short Effect of Different Host Plants on Nutritional Indices of the Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera
title_sort effect of different host plants on nutritional indices of the pod borer, helicoverpa armigera
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3476957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22963648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1673/031.012.5501
work_keys_str_mv AT hematisa effectofdifferenthostplantsonnutritionalindicesofthepodborerhelicoverpaarmigera
AT naserib effectofdifferenthostplantsonnutritionalindicesofthepodborerhelicoverpaarmigera
AT ganbalanignouri effectofdifferenthostplantsonnutritionalindicesofthepodborerhelicoverpaarmigera
AT dastjerdihrafiee effectofdifferenthostplantsonnutritionalindicesofthepodborerhelicoverpaarmigera
AT golizadeha effectofdifferenthostplantsonnutritionalindicesofthepodborerhelicoverpaarmigera