Cargando…
Effect of Different Host Plants on Nutritional Indices of the Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera
Nutritional indices of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on different host plants including chickpea (cultivars Arman, Hashem, Azad, and Binivich), common bean (cultivar Khomein), white kidney bean (cultivar Dehghan), red kidney bean (cultivar Goli), cowpea (cultivar Mashhad), t...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
University of Wisconsin Library
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3476957/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22963648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1673/031.012.5501 |
_version_ | 1782247142794985472 |
---|---|
author | Hemati, S.A. Naseri, B. Ganbalani, G. Nouri Dastjerdi, H. Rafiee Golizadeh, A. |
author_facet | Hemati, S.A. Naseri, B. Ganbalani, G. Nouri Dastjerdi, H. Rafiee Golizadeh, A. |
author_sort | Hemati, S.A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Nutritional indices of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on different host plants including chickpea (cultivars Arman, Hashem, Azad, and Binivich), common bean (cultivar Khomein), white kidney bean (cultivar Dehghan), red kidney bean (cultivar Goli), cowpea (cultivar Mashhad), tomato (cultivar Meshkin) and potato (cultivars Agria and Satina) were studied under laboratory conditions (25 ± 1 °C, 65 ± 5% RH, 16:8 L:D). Third instar larvae reared on potato Agria showed the highest efficiency of conversion of digested food (ECD) and efficiency of conversion of ingested food (ECI) (50.800 é 0.104% and 13.630 ± 0.016%, respectively). Approximate digestibility (AD) values of the fourth instar larvae were highest (92.651 ± 0.004%) and lowest (57.140 — 0.049%) on chickpea Azad and potato Agria, respectively. The fifth instar larvae fed on tomato Meshkin and white kidney bean Dehghan had the highest consumption index (CI) (3.717 ± 0.091) and relative consumption rate (RCR) (1.620 ± 0.074), respectively. Whole larval instars showed the highest ECI and ECD values on potatoes Satina (14.640 ± 0.014%) and Agria (21.380 ± 0.015%), respectively, and the lowest of both values on tomato Meshkin (ECI: 5.748 ± 0.002% and ECD: 7.341 ± 0.002%). The results of nutritional indices and the cluster analysis indicated that tomato Meshkin was an unsuitable host for feeding of H. armigera. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3476957 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | University of Wisconsin Library |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34769572012-10-24 Effect of Different Host Plants on Nutritional Indices of the Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera Hemati, S.A. Naseri, B. Ganbalani, G. Nouri Dastjerdi, H. Rafiee Golizadeh, A. J Insect Sci Article Nutritional indices of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on different host plants including chickpea (cultivars Arman, Hashem, Azad, and Binivich), common bean (cultivar Khomein), white kidney bean (cultivar Dehghan), red kidney bean (cultivar Goli), cowpea (cultivar Mashhad), tomato (cultivar Meshkin) and potato (cultivars Agria and Satina) were studied under laboratory conditions (25 ± 1 °C, 65 ± 5% RH, 16:8 L:D). Third instar larvae reared on potato Agria showed the highest efficiency of conversion of digested food (ECD) and efficiency of conversion of ingested food (ECI) (50.800 é 0.104% and 13.630 ± 0.016%, respectively). Approximate digestibility (AD) values of the fourth instar larvae were highest (92.651 ± 0.004%) and lowest (57.140 — 0.049%) on chickpea Azad and potato Agria, respectively. The fifth instar larvae fed on tomato Meshkin and white kidney bean Dehghan had the highest consumption index (CI) (3.717 ± 0.091) and relative consumption rate (RCR) (1.620 ± 0.074), respectively. Whole larval instars showed the highest ECI and ECD values on potatoes Satina (14.640 ± 0.014%) and Agria (21.380 ± 0.015%), respectively, and the lowest of both values on tomato Meshkin (ECI: 5.748 ± 0.002% and ECD: 7.341 ± 0.002%). The results of nutritional indices and the cluster analysis indicated that tomato Meshkin was an unsuitable host for feeding of H. armigera. University of Wisconsin Library 2012-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3476957/ /pubmed/22963648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1673/031.012.5501 Text en © 2012 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Hemati, S.A. Naseri, B. Ganbalani, G. Nouri Dastjerdi, H. Rafiee Golizadeh, A. Effect of Different Host Plants on Nutritional Indices of the Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera |
title | Effect of Different Host Plants on Nutritional Indices of the Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera
|
title_full | Effect of Different Host Plants on Nutritional Indices of the Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera
|
title_fullStr | Effect of Different Host Plants on Nutritional Indices of the Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera
|
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of Different Host Plants on Nutritional Indices of the Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera
|
title_short | Effect of Different Host Plants on Nutritional Indices of the Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera
|
title_sort | effect of different host plants on nutritional indices of the pod borer, helicoverpa armigera |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3476957/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22963648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1673/031.012.5501 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hematisa effectofdifferenthostplantsonnutritionalindicesofthepodborerhelicoverpaarmigera AT naserib effectofdifferenthostplantsonnutritionalindicesofthepodborerhelicoverpaarmigera AT ganbalanignouri effectofdifferenthostplantsonnutritionalindicesofthepodborerhelicoverpaarmigera AT dastjerdihrafiee effectofdifferenthostplantsonnutritionalindicesofthepodborerhelicoverpaarmigera AT golizadeha effectofdifferenthostplantsonnutritionalindicesofthepodborerhelicoverpaarmigera |