Cargando…

Isolation of Osteoprogenitors from Human Jaw Periosteal Cells: A Comparison of Two Magnetic Separation Methods

Human jaw periosteum tissue contains osteoprogenitors that have potential for tissue engineering applications in oral and maxillofacial surgeries. To isolate osteoprogenitor cells from heterogeneous cell populations, we used the specific mesenchymal stem cell antigen-1 (MSCA-1) antibody and compared...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olbrich, Marcus, Rieger, Melanie, Reinert, Siegmar, Alexander, Dorothea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3477152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23094035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047176
_version_ 1782247204563451904
author Olbrich, Marcus
Rieger, Melanie
Reinert, Siegmar
Alexander, Dorothea
author_facet Olbrich, Marcus
Rieger, Melanie
Reinert, Siegmar
Alexander, Dorothea
author_sort Olbrich, Marcus
collection PubMed
description Human jaw periosteum tissue contains osteoprogenitors that have potential for tissue engineering applications in oral and maxillofacial surgeries. To isolate osteoprogenitor cells from heterogeneous cell populations, we used the specific mesenchymal stem cell antigen-1 (MSCA-1) antibody and compared two magnetic separation methods. We analyzed the obtained MSCA-1(+) and MSCA-1(−) fractions in terms of purity, yield of positive/negative cells and proliferative and mineralization potentials. The analysis of cell viability after separation revealed that the EasySep method yielded higher viability rates, whereas the flow cytometry results showed a higher purity for the MACS-separated cell fractions. The mineralization capacity of the osteogenic induced MSCA-1(+) cells compared with the MSCA-1(−) controls using MACS was 5-fold higher, whereas the same comparison after EasySep showed no significant differences between both fractions. By analyzing cell proliferation, we detected a significant difference between the proliferative potential of the osteogenic cells versus untreated cells after the MACS and EasySep separations. The differentiated cells after MACS separation adjusted their proliferative capacity, whereas the EasySep-separated cells failed to do so. The protein expression analysis showed small differences between the two separation methods. Our findings suggest that MACS is a more suitable separation method to isolate osteoprogenitors from the entire jaw periosteal cell population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3477152
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34771522012-10-23 Isolation of Osteoprogenitors from Human Jaw Periosteal Cells: A Comparison of Two Magnetic Separation Methods Olbrich, Marcus Rieger, Melanie Reinert, Siegmar Alexander, Dorothea PLoS One Research Article Human jaw periosteum tissue contains osteoprogenitors that have potential for tissue engineering applications in oral and maxillofacial surgeries. To isolate osteoprogenitor cells from heterogeneous cell populations, we used the specific mesenchymal stem cell antigen-1 (MSCA-1) antibody and compared two magnetic separation methods. We analyzed the obtained MSCA-1(+) and MSCA-1(−) fractions in terms of purity, yield of positive/negative cells and proliferative and mineralization potentials. The analysis of cell viability after separation revealed that the EasySep method yielded higher viability rates, whereas the flow cytometry results showed a higher purity for the MACS-separated cell fractions. The mineralization capacity of the osteogenic induced MSCA-1(+) cells compared with the MSCA-1(−) controls using MACS was 5-fold higher, whereas the same comparison after EasySep showed no significant differences between both fractions. By analyzing cell proliferation, we detected a significant difference between the proliferative potential of the osteogenic cells versus untreated cells after the MACS and EasySep separations. The differentiated cells after MACS separation adjusted their proliferative capacity, whereas the EasySep-separated cells failed to do so. The protein expression analysis showed small differences between the two separation methods. Our findings suggest that MACS is a more suitable separation method to isolate osteoprogenitors from the entire jaw periosteal cell population. Public Library of Science 2012-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3477152/ /pubmed/23094035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047176 Text en © 2012 Olbrich et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Olbrich, Marcus
Rieger, Melanie
Reinert, Siegmar
Alexander, Dorothea
Isolation of Osteoprogenitors from Human Jaw Periosteal Cells: A Comparison of Two Magnetic Separation Methods
title Isolation of Osteoprogenitors from Human Jaw Periosteal Cells: A Comparison of Two Magnetic Separation Methods
title_full Isolation of Osteoprogenitors from Human Jaw Periosteal Cells: A Comparison of Two Magnetic Separation Methods
title_fullStr Isolation of Osteoprogenitors from Human Jaw Periosteal Cells: A Comparison of Two Magnetic Separation Methods
title_full_unstemmed Isolation of Osteoprogenitors from Human Jaw Periosteal Cells: A Comparison of Two Magnetic Separation Methods
title_short Isolation of Osteoprogenitors from Human Jaw Periosteal Cells: A Comparison of Two Magnetic Separation Methods
title_sort isolation of osteoprogenitors from human jaw periosteal cells: a comparison of two magnetic separation methods
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3477152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23094035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047176
work_keys_str_mv AT olbrichmarcus isolationofosteoprogenitorsfromhumanjawperiostealcellsacomparisonoftwomagneticseparationmethods
AT riegermelanie isolationofosteoprogenitorsfromhumanjawperiostealcellsacomparisonoftwomagneticseparationmethods
AT reinertsiegmar isolationofosteoprogenitorsfromhumanjawperiostealcellsacomparisonoftwomagneticseparationmethods
AT alexanderdorothea isolationofosteoprogenitorsfromhumanjawperiostealcellsacomparisonoftwomagneticseparationmethods