Cargando…

Strategies for patient profiling in articular cartilage repair of the knee: a prospective cohort of patients treated by one experienced cartilage surgeon

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report on the clinical outcome of a large heterogenic cartilage repair population treated with the profiling strategies of one experienced cartilage surgeon to provide evidence based tools for treatment selection in a clinical environment. METHODS: A total o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Windt, Tommy S., Concaro, Sebastian, Lindahl, Anders, Saris, Daniel B. F., Brittberg, Mats
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3477475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22246544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1855-8
_version_ 1782247219483639808
author de Windt, Tommy S.
Concaro, Sebastian
Lindahl, Anders
Saris, Daniel B. F.
Brittberg, Mats
author_facet de Windt, Tommy S.
Concaro, Sebastian
Lindahl, Anders
Saris, Daniel B. F.
Brittberg, Mats
author_sort de Windt, Tommy S.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report on the clinical outcome of a large heterogenic cartilage repair population treated with the profiling strategies of one experienced cartilage surgeon to provide evidence based tools for treatment selection in a clinical environment. METHODS: A total of 216 patients were identified in this prospective single-surgeon study. For the primary and secondary treatment of smaller defects, microfracture (MF) was used. Hyalograft C was used for first and second line larger defects, while carbon-fiber rod and pad implantations were used as a salvage procedure. RESULTS: Three years after the initial procedure, the clinical improvement was excellent for MF and Hyalograft C (P < 0.001) and good for carbon-fiber procedures (P < 0.05). Hyalograft C patients with prior anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction had less clinical improvement (P < 0.05), while MF patients with prior cartilage repair were more likely to fail (Odds Ratio 20.5, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This is the first study that provides an assessment of the treatment strategies used by an experienced cartilage surgeon. A treatment algorithm for cartilage repair in a heterogenic population was created that based on the findings of this study could be implemented in a clinical environment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective clinical case series, Level IV
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3477475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34774752012-10-31 Strategies for patient profiling in articular cartilage repair of the knee: a prospective cohort of patients treated by one experienced cartilage surgeon de Windt, Tommy S. Concaro, Sebastian Lindahl, Anders Saris, Daniel B. F. Brittberg, Mats Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Knee PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report on the clinical outcome of a large heterogenic cartilage repair population treated with the profiling strategies of one experienced cartilage surgeon to provide evidence based tools for treatment selection in a clinical environment. METHODS: A total of 216 patients were identified in this prospective single-surgeon study. For the primary and secondary treatment of smaller defects, microfracture (MF) was used. Hyalograft C was used for first and second line larger defects, while carbon-fiber rod and pad implantations were used as a salvage procedure. RESULTS: Three years after the initial procedure, the clinical improvement was excellent for MF and Hyalograft C (P < 0.001) and good for carbon-fiber procedures (P < 0.05). Hyalograft C patients with prior anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction had less clinical improvement (P < 0.05), while MF patients with prior cartilage repair were more likely to fail (Odds Ratio 20.5, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This is the first study that provides an assessment of the treatment strategies used by an experienced cartilage surgeon. A treatment algorithm for cartilage repair in a heterogenic population was created that based on the findings of this study could be implemented in a clinical environment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective clinical case series, Level IV Springer-Verlag 2012-01-14 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3477475/ /pubmed/22246544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1855-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Knee
de Windt, Tommy S.
Concaro, Sebastian
Lindahl, Anders
Saris, Daniel B. F.
Brittberg, Mats
Strategies for patient profiling in articular cartilage repair of the knee: a prospective cohort of patients treated by one experienced cartilage surgeon
title Strategies for patient profiling in articular cartilage repair of the knee: a prospective cohort of patients treated by one experienced cartilage surgeon
title_full Strategies for patient profiling in articular cartilage repair of the knee: a prospective cohort of patients treated by one experienced cartilage surgeon
title_fullStr Strategies for patient profiling in articular cartilage repair of the knee: a prospective cohort of patients treated by one experienced cartilage surgeon
title_full_unstemmed Strategies for patient profiling in articular cartilage repair of the knee: a prospective cohort of patients treated by one experienced cartilage surgeon
title_short Strategies for patient profiling in articular cartilage repair of the knee: a prospective cohort of patients treated by one experienced cartilage surgeon
title_sort strategies for patient profiling in articular cartilage repair of the knee: a prospective cohort of patients treated by one experienced cartilage surgeon
topic Knee
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3477475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22246544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1855-8
work_keys_str_mv AT dewindttommys strategiesforpatientprofilinginarticularcartilagerepairofthekneeaprospectivecohortofpatientstreatedbyoneexperiencedcartilagesurgeon
AT concarosebastian strategiesforpatientprofilinginarticularcartilagerepairofthekneeaprospectivecohortofpatientstreatedbyoneexperiencedcartilagesurgeon
AT lindahlanders strategiesforpatientprofilinginarticularcartilagerepairofthekneeaprospectivecohortofpatientstreatedbyoneexperiencedcartilagesurgeon
AT sarisdanielbf strategiesforpatientprofilinginarticularcartilagerepairofthekneeaprospectivecohortofpatientstreatedbyoneexperiencedcartilagesurgeon
AT brittbergmats strategiesforpatientprofilinginarticularcartilagerepairofthekneeaprospectivecohortofpatientstreatedbyoneexperiencedcartilagesurgeon