Cargando…

Comparison of the Subgross Distribution of the Lesions in Invasive Ductal and Lobular Carcinomas of the Breast: A Large-Format Histology Study

To compare the lesion distribution and the extent of the disease in ductal and lobular carcinomas of the breast, we studied 586 ductal and 133 lobular consecutive cancers. All cases were documented on large-format histology slides. The invasive component of ductal carcinomas was unifocal in 63.3% (3...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hofmeyer, Syster, Pekár, Gyula, Gere, Mária, Tarján, Miklós, Hellberg, Dan, Tot, Tibor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3477712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23097710
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/436141
_version_ 1782247253910487040
author Hofmeyer, Syster
Pekár, Gyula
Gere, Mária
Tarján, Miklós
Hellberg, Dan
Tot, Tibor
author_facet Hofmeyer, Syster
Pekár, Gyula
Gere, Mária
Tarján, Miklós
Hellberg, Dan
Tot, Tibor
author_sort Hofmeyer, Syster
collection PubMed
description To compare the lesion distribution and the extent of the disease in ductal and lobular carcinomas of the breast, we studied 586 ductal and 133 lobular consecutive cancers. All cases were documented on large-format histology slides. The invasive component of ductal carcinomas was unifocal in 63.3% (371/586), multifocal in 35.5% (208/586), and diffuse in 1.2% (7/586) of the cases. The corresponding figures in the lobular group were 27.8% (37/133), 45.9% (61/586), and 26.3% (35/133), respectively. When the distribution of the in situ and invasive component in the same tumors was combined to give an aggregate pattern, the ductal carcinomas were unifocal in 41.6% (244/586), multifocal in 31.6% (185/586), and diffuse in 26.8% (157/586) of the cases. The corresponding figures in the lobular category were 15.0% (20/133), 54.2% (72/133), and 30.8% (41/133), respectively. Ductal cancers were extensive in 45.7% (268/586), lobular in 65.4% (87/133) of the cases. All these differences were statistically highly significant (P < 0.0001). While the histological tumor type itself (ductal versus lobular) did not influence the lymph node status, multifocal and diffuse distribution of the lesions were associated with significantly increased risk of lymph node metastases in both ductal and lobular cancers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3477712
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34777122012-10-24 Comparison of the Subgross Distribution of the Lesions in Invasive Ductal and Lobular Carcinomas of the Breast: A Large-Format Histology Study Hofmeyer, Syster Pekár, Gyula Gere, Mária Tarján, Miklós Hellberg, Dan Tot, Tibor Int J Breast Cancer Research Article To compare the lesion distribution and the extent of the disease in ductal and lobular carcinomas of the breast, we studied 586 ductal and 133 lobular consecutive cancers. All cases were documented on large-format histology slides. The invasive component of ductal carcinomas was unifocal in 63.3% (371/586), multifocal in 35.5% (208/586), and diffuse in 1.2% (7/586) of the cases. The corresponding figures in the lobular group were 27.8% (37/133), 45.9% (61/586), and 26.3% (35/133), respectively. When the distribution of the in situ and invasive component in the same tumors was combined to give an aggregate pattern, the ductal carcinomas were unifocal in 41.6% (244/586), multifocal in 31.6% (185/586), and diffuse in 26.8% (157/586) of the cases. The corresponding figures in the lobular category were 15.0% (20/133), 54.2% (72/133), and 30.8% (41/133), respectively. Ductal cancers were extensive in 45.7% (268/586), lobular in 65.4% (87/133) of the cases. All these differences were statistically highly significant (P < 0.0001). While the histological tumor type itself (ductal versus lobular) did not influence the lymph node status, multifocal and diffuse distribution of the lesions were associated with significantly increased risk of lymph node metastases in both ductal and lobular cancers. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3477712/ /pubmed/23097710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/436141 Text en Copyright © 2012 Syster Hofmeyer et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hofmeyer, Syster
Pekár, Gyula
Gere, Mária
Tarján, Miklós
Hellberg, Dan
Tot, Tibor
Comparison of the Subgross Distribution of the Lesions in Invasive Ductal and Lobular Carcinomas of the Breast: A Large-Format Histology Study
title Comparison of the Subgross Distribution of the Lesions in Invasive Ductal and Lobular Carcinomas of the Breast: A Large-Format Histology Study
title_full Comparison of the Subgross Distribution of the Lesions in Invasive Ductal and Lobular Carcinomas of the Breast: A Large-Format Histology Study
title_fullStr Comparison of the Subgross Distribution of the Lesions in Invasive Ductal and Lobular Carcinomas of the Breast: A Large-Format Histology Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Subgross Distribution of the Lesions in Invasive Ductal and Lobular Carcinomas of the Breast: A Large-Format Histology Study
title_short Comparison of the Subgross Distribution of the Lesions in Invasive Ductal and Lobular Carcinomas of the Breast: A Large-Format Histology Study
title_sort comparison of the subgross distribution of the lesions in invasive ductal and lobular carcinomas of the breast: a large-format histology study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3477712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23097710
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/436141
work_keys_str_mv AT hofmeyersyster comparisonofthesubgrossdistributionofthelesionsininvasiveductalandlobularcarcinomasofthebreastalargeformathistologystudy
AT pekargyula comparisonofthesubgrossdistributionofthelesionsininvasiveductalandlobularcarcinomasofthebreastalargeformathistologystudy
AT geremaria comparisonofthesubgrossdistributionofthelesionsininvasiveductalandlobularcarcinomasofthebreastalargeformathistologystudy
AT tarjanmiklos comparisonofthesubgrossdistributionofthelesionsininvasiveductalandlobularcarcinomasofthebreastalargeformathistologystudy
AT hellbergdan comparisonofthesubgrossdistributionofthelesionsininvasiveductalandlobularcarcinomasofthebreastalargeformathistologystudy
AT tottibor comparisonofthesubgrossdistributionofthelesionsininvasiveductalandlobularcarcinomasofthebreastalargeformathistologystudy