Cargando…
Selection for altruism through random drift in variable size populations
BACKGROUND: Altruistic behavior is defined as helping others at a cost to oneself and a lowered fitness. The lower fitness implies that altruists should be selected against, which is in contradiction with their widespread presence is nature. Present models of selection for altruism (kin or multileve...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3478210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22574999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-12-61 |
_version_ | 1782247287443947520 |
---|---|
author | Houchmandzadeh, Bahram Vallade, Marcel |
author_facet | Houchmandzadeh, Bahram Vallade, Marcel |
author_sort | Houchmandzadeh, Bahram |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Altruistic behavior is defined as helping others at a cost to oneself and a lowered fitness. The lower fitness implies that altruists should be selected against, which is in contradiction with their widespread presence is nature. Present models of selection for altruism (kin or multilevel) show that altruistic behaviors can have ‘hidden’ advantages if the ‘common good’ produced by altruists is restricted to some related or unrelated groups. These models are mostly deterministic, or assume a frequency dependent fitness. RESULTS: Evolutionary dynamics is a competition between deterministic selection pressure and stochastic events due to random sampling from one generation to the next. We show here that an altruistic allele extending the carrying capacity of the habitat can win by increasing the random drift of “selfish” alleles. In other terms, the fixation probability of altruistic genes can be higher than those of a selfish ones, even though altruists have a smaller fitness. Moreover when populations are geographically structured, the altruists advantage can be highly amplified and the fixation probability of selfish genes can tend toward zero. The above results are obtained both by numerical and analytical calculations. Analytical results are obtained in the limit of large populations. CONCLUSIONS: The theory we present does not involve kin or multilevel selection, but is based on the existence of random drift in variable size populations. The model is a generalization of the original Fisher-Wright and Moran models where the carrying capacity depends on the number of altruists. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3478210 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34782102012-10-23 Selection for altruism through random drift in variable size populations Houchmandzadeh, Bahram Vallade, Marcel BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Altruistic behavior is defined as helping others at a cost to oneself and a lowered fitness. The lower fitness implies that altruists should be selected against, which is in contradiction with their widespread presence is nature. Present models of selection for altruism (kin or multilevel) show that altruistic behaviors can have ‘hidden’ advantages if the ‘common good’ produced by altruists is restricted to some related or unrelated groups. These models are mostly deterministic, or assume a frequency dependent fitness. RESULTS: Evolutionary dynamics is a competition between deterministic selection pressure and stochastic events due to random sampling from one generation to the next. We show here that an altruistic allele extending the carrying capacity of the habitat can win by increasing the random drift of “selfish” alleles. In other terms, the fixation probability of altruistic genes can be higher than those of a selfish ones, even though altruists have a smaller fitness. Moreover when populations are geographically structured, the altruists advantage can be highly amplified and the fixation probability of selfish genes can tend toward zero. The above results are obtained both by numerical and analytical calculations. Analytical results are obtained in the limit of large populations. CONCLUSIONS: The theory we present does not involve kin or multilevel selection, but is based on the existence of random drift in variable size populations. The model is a generalization of the original Fisher-Wright and Moran models where the carrying capacity depends on the number of altruists. BioMed Central 2012-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3478210/ /pubmed/22574999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-12-61 Text en Copyright ©2012 Houchmandzadeh and Vallade; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Houchmandzadeh, Bahram Vallade, Marcel Selection for altruism through random drift in variable size populations |
title | Selection for altruism through random drift in variable size populations |
title_full | Selection for altruism through random drift in variable size populations |
title_fullStr | Selection for altruism through random drift in variable size populations |
title_full_unstemmed | Selection for altruism through random drift in variable size populations |
title_short | Selection for altruism through random drift in variable size populations |
title_sort | selection for altruism through random drift in variable size populations |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3478210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22574999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-12-61 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT houchmandzadehbahram selectionforaltruismthroughrandomdriftinvariablesizepopulations AT vallademarcel selectionforaltruismthroughrandomdriftinvariablesizepopulations |