Why are psychiatric imaging methods clinically unreliable? Conclusions and practical guidelines for authors, editors and reviewers

No reliable anatomical or functional alterations have been confirmed in psychiatric neuroimaging; however it can become reliable with translational impact on clinical practice when considering crucial methodological issues. We provide guidelines to authors, editors and reviewers in the implementatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Borgwardt, Stefan, Radua, Joaquim, Mechelli, Andrea, Fusar-Poli, Paolo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Commentary
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3478220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22938624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-8-46
_version_ 1782247290731233280
author Borgwardt, Stefan
Radua, Joaquim
Mechelli, Andrea
Fusar-Poli, Paolo
author_facet Borgwardt, Stefan
Radua, Joaquim
Mechelli, Andrea
Fusar-Poli, Paolo
author_sort Borgwardt, Stefan
collection PubMed
description No reliable anatomical or functional alterations have been confirmed in psychiatric neuroimaging; however it can become reliable with translational impact on clinical practice when considering crucial methodological issues. We provide guidelines to authors, editors and reviewers in the implementation/evaluation of neuroimaging studies to bend neuroimaging to be more than basic neuroscience.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3478220
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34782202012-10-23 Why are psychiatric imaging methods clinically unreliable? Conclusions and practical guidelines for authors, editors and reviewers Borgwardt, Stefan Radua, Joaquim Mechelli, Andrea Fusar-Poli, Paolo Behav Brain Funct Commentary No reliable anatomical or functional alterations have been confirmed in psychiatric neuroimaging; however it can become reliable with translational impact on clinical practice when considering crucial methodological issues. We provide guidelines to authors, editors and reviewers in the implementation/evaluation of neuroimaging studies to bend neuroimaging to be more than basic neuroscience. BioMed Central 2012-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3478220/ /pubmed/22938624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-8-46 Text en Copyright ©2012 Borgwardt et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Commentary
Borgwardt, Stefan
Radua, Joaquim
Mechelli, Andrea
Fusar-Poli, Paolo
Why are psychiatric imaging methods clinically unreliable? Conclusions and practical guidelines for authors, editors and reviewers
title Why are psychiatric imaging methods clinically unreliable? Conclusions and practical guidelines for authors, editors and reviewers
title_full Why are psychiatric imaging methods clinically unreliable? Conclusions and practical guidelines for authors, editors and reviewers
title_fullStr Why are psychiatric imaging methods clinically unreliable? Conclusions and practical guidelines for authors, editors and reviewers
title_full_unstemmed Why are psychiatric imaging methods clinically unreliable? Conclusions and practical guidelines for authors, editors and reviewers
title_short Why are psychiatric imaging methods clinically unreliable? Conclusions and practical guidelines for authors, editors and reviewers
title_sort why are psychiatric imaging methods clinically unreliable? conclusions and practical guidelines for authors, editors and reviewers
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3478220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22938624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-8-46
work_keys_str_mv AT borgwardtstefan whyarepsychiatricimagingmethodsclinicallyunreliableconclusionsandpracticalguidelinesforauthorseditorsandreviewers
AT raduajoaquim whyarepsychiatricimagingmethodsclinicallyunreliableconclusionsandpracticalguidelinesforauthorseditorsandreviewers
AT mechelliandrea whyarepsychiatricimagingmethodsclinicallyunreliableconclusionsandpracticalguidelinesforauthorseditorsandreviewers
AT fusarpolipaolo whyarepsychiatricimagingmethodsclinicallyunreliableconclusionsandpracticalguidelinesforauthorseditorsandreviewers

Ejemplares similares