Cargando…
Why are psychiatric imaging methods clinically unreliable? Conclusions and practical guidelines for authors, editors and reviewers
No reliable anatomical or functional alterations have been confirmed in psychiatric neuroimaging; however it can become reliable with translational impact on clinical practice when considering crucial methodological issues. We provide guidelines to authors, editors and reviewers in the implementatio...
Autores principales: | Borgwardt, Stefan, Radua, Joaquim, Mechelli, Andrea, Fusar-Poli, Paolo |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3478220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22938624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-8-46 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Evidence of reporting biases in voxel‐based morphometry (VBM) studies of psychiatric and neurological disorders
por: Fusar‐Poli, Paolo, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Confessions in AHT cases are unreliable: A letter to the editor
por: Luttner, Susan
Publicado: (2023) -
Analysis of US Food and Drug Administration Breast Implant Postapproval Studies Finding an Increased Risk of Diseases and Cancer: Why the Conclusions Are Unreliable
por: Swanson, Eric
Publicado: (2019) -
White matter pathology – an endophenotype for bipolar disorder?
por: Borgwardt, Stefan, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Basic mathematical errors may make ecological assessments unreliable
por: Lintott, P. R., et al.
Publicado: (2017)