Cargando…
Dopaminergic Modulation of Effort-Related Choice Behavior as Assessed by a Progressive Ratio Chow Feeding Choice Task: Pharmacological Studies and the Role of Individual Differences
Mesolimbic dopamine (DA) is involved in behavioral activation and effort-related processes. Rats with impaired DA transmission reallocate their instrumental behavior away from food-reinforced tasks with high response requirements, and instead select less effortful food-seeking behaviors. In the pres...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3478264/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23110135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047934 |
_version_ | 1782247298803171328 |
---|---|
author | Randall, Patrick A. Pardo, Marta Nunes, Eric J. López Cruz, Laura Vemuri, V. Kiran Makriyannis, Alex Baqi, Younis Müller, Christa E. Correa, Mercè Salamone, John D. |
author_facet | Randall, Patrick A. Pardo, Marta Nunes, Eric J. López Cruz, Laura Vemuri, V. Kiran Makriyannis, Alex Baqi, Younis Müller, Christa E. Correa, Mercè Salamone, John D. |
author_sort | Randall, Patrick A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mesolimbic dopamine (DA) is involved in behavioral activation and effort-related processes. Rats with impaired DA transmission reallocate their instrumental behavior away from food-reinforced tasks with high response requirements, and instead select less effortful food-seeking behaviors. In the present study, the effects of several drug treatments were assessed using a progressive ratio (PROG)/chow feeding concurrent choice task. With this task, rats can lever press on a PROG schedule reinforced by a preferred high-carbohydrate food pellet, or alternatively approach and consume the less-preferred but concurrently available laboratory chow. Rats pass through each ratio level 15 times, after which the ratio requirement is incremented by one additional response. The DA D(2) antagonist haloperidol (0.025–0.1 mg/kg) reduced number of lever presses and highest ratio achieved but did not reduce chow intake. In contrast, the adenosine A(2A) antagonist MSX-3 increased lever presses and highest ratio achieved, but decreased chow consumption. The cannabinoid CB1 inverse agonist and putative appetite suppressant AM251 decreased lever presses, highest ratio achieved, and chow intake; this effect was similar to that produced by pre-feeding. Furthermore, DA-related signal transduction activity (pDARPP-32(Thr34) expression) was greater in nucleus accumbens core of high responders (rats with high lever pressing output) compared to low responders. Thus, the effects of DA antagonism differed greatly from those produced by pre-feeding or reduced CB1 transmission, and it appears unlikely that haloperidol reduces PROG responding because of a general reduction in primary food motivation or the unconditioned reinforcing properties of food. Furthermore, accumbens core signal transduction activity is related to individual differences in work output. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3478264 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34782642012-10-29 Dopaminergic Modulation of Effort-Related Choice Behavior as Assessed by a Progressive Ratio Chow Feeding Choice Task: Pharmacological Studies and the Role of Individual Differences Randall, Patrick A. Pardo, Marta Nunes, Eric J. López Cruz, Laura Vemuri, V. Kiran Makriyannis, Alex Baqi, Younis Müller, Christa E. Correa, Mercè Salamone, John D. PLoS One Research Article Mesolimbic dopamine (DA) is involved in behavioral activation and effort-related processes. Rats with impaired DA transmission reallocate their instrumental behavior away from food-reinforced tasks with high response requirements, and instead select less effortful food-seeking behaviors. In the present study, the effects of several drug treatments were assessed using a progressive ratio (PROG)/chow feeding concurrent choice task. With this task, rats can lever press on a PROG schedule reinforced by a preferred high-carbohydrate food pellet, or alternatively approach and consume the less-preferred but concurrently available laboratory chow. Rats pass through each ratio level 15 times, after which the ratio requirement is incremented by one additional response. The DA D(2) antagonist haloperidol (0.025–0.1 mg/kg) reduced number of lever presses and highest ratio achieved but did not reduce chow intake. In contrast, the adenosine A(2A) antagonist MSX-3 increased lever presses and highest ratio achieved, but decreased chow consumption. The cannabinoid CB1 inverse agonist and putative appetite suppressant AM251 decreased lever presses, highest ratio achieved, and chow intake; this effect was similar to that produced by pre-feeding. Furthermore, DA-related signal transduction activity (pDARPP-32(Thr34) expression) was greater in nucleus accumbens core of high responders (rats with high lever pressing output) compared to low responders. Thus, the effects of DA antagonism differed greatly from those produced by pre-feeding or reduced CB1 transmission, and it appears unlikely that haloperidol reduces PROG responding because of a general reduction in primary food motivation or the unconditioned reinforcing properties of food. Furthermore, accumbens core signal transduction activity is related to individual differences in work output. Public Library of Science 2012-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3478264/ /pubmed/23110135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047934 Text en © 2012 Randall et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Randall, Patrick A. Pardo, Marta Nunes, Eric J. López Cruz, Laura Vemuri, V. Kiran Makriyannis, Alex Baqi, Younis Müller, Christa E. Correa, Mercè Salamone, John D. Dopaminergic Modulation of Effort-Related Choice Behavior as Assessed by a Progressive Ratio Chow Feeding Choice Task: Pharmacological Studies and the Role of Individual Differences |
title | Dopaminergic Modulation of Effort-Related Choice Behavior as Assessed by a Progressive Ratio Chow Feeding Choice Task: Pharmacological Studies and the Role of Individual Differences |
title_full | Dopaminergic Modulation of Effort-Related Choice Behavior as Assessed by a Progressive Ratio Chow Feeding Choice Task: Pharmacological Studies and the Role of Individual Differences |
title_fullStr | Dopaminergic Modulation of Effort-Related Choice Behavior as Assessed by a Progressive Ratio Chow Feeding Choice Task: Pharmacological Studies and the Role of Individual Differences |
title_full_unstemmed | Dopaminergic Modulation of Effort-Related Choice Behavior as Assessed by a Progressive Ratio Chow Feeding Choice Task: Pharmacological Studies and the Role of Individual Differences |
title_short | Dopaminergic Modulation of Effort-Related Choice Behavior as Assessed by a Progressive Ratio Chow Feeding Choice Task: Pharmacological Studies and the Role of Individual Differences |
title_sort | dopaminergic modulation of effort-related choice behavior as assessed by a progressive ratio chow feeding choice task: pharmacological studies and the role of individual differences |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3478264/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23110135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047934 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT randallpatricka dopaminergicmodulationofeffortrelatedchoicebehaviorasassessedbyaprogressiveratiochowfeedingchoicetaskpharmacologicalstudiesandtheroleofindividualdifferences AT pardomarta dopaminergicmodulationofeffortrelatedchoicebehaviorasassessedbyaprogressiveratiochowfeedingchoicetaskpharmacologicalstudiesandtheroleofindividualdifferences AT nunesericj dopaminergicmodulationofeffortrelatedchoicebehaviorasassessedbyaprogressiveratiochowfeedingchoicetaskpharmacologicalstudiesandtheroleofindividualdifferences AT lopezcruzlaura dopaminergicmodulationofeffortrelatedchoicebehaviorasassessedbyaprogressiveratiochowfeedingchoicetaskpharmacologicalstudiesandtheroleofindividualdifferences AT vemurivkiran dopaminergicmodulationofeffortrelatedchoicebehaviorasassessedbyaprogressiveratiochowfeedingchoicetaskpharmacologicalstudiesandtheroleofindividualdifferences AT makriyannisalex dopaminergicmodulationofeffortrelatedchoicebehaviorasassessedbyaprogressiveratiochowfeedingchoicetaskpharmacologicalstudiesandtheroleofindividualdifferences AT baqiyounis dopaminergicmodulationofeffortrelatedchoicebehaviorasassessedbyaprogressiveratiochowfeedingchoicetaskpharmacologicalstudiesandtheroleofindividualdifferences AT mullerchristae dopaminergicmodulationofeffortrelatedchoicebehaviorasassessedbyaprogressiveratiochowfeedingchoicetaskpharmacologicalstudiesandtheroleofindividualdifferences AT correamerce dopaminergicmodulationofeffortrelatedchoicebehaviorasassessedbyaprogressiveratiochowfeedingchoicetaskpharmacologicalstudiesandtheroleofindividualdifferences AT salamonejohnd dopaminergicmodulationofeffortrelatedchoicebehaviorasassessedbyaprogressiveratiochowfeedingchoicetaskpharmacologicalstudiesandtheroleofindividualdifferences |