Cargando…

Dopaminergic Modulation of Effort-Related Choice Behavior as Assessed by a Progressive Ratio Chow Feeding Choice Task: Pharmacological Studies and the Role of Individual Differences

Mesolimbic dopamine (DA) is involved in behavioral activation and effort-related processes. Rats with impaired DA transmission reallocate their instrumental behavior away from food-reinforced tasks with high response requirements, and instead select less effortful food-seeking behaviors. In the pres...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Randall, Patrick A., Pardo, Marta, Nunes, Eric J., López Cruz, Laura, Vemuri, V. Kiran, Makriyannis, Alex, Baqi, Younis, Müller, Christa E., Correa, Mercè, Salamone, John D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3478264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23110135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047934
_version_ 1782247298803171328
author Randall, Patrick A.
Pardo, Marta
Nunes, Eric J.
López Cruz, Laura
Vemuri, V. Kiran
Makriyannis, Alex
Baqi, Younis
Müller, Christa E.
Correa, Mercè
Salamone, John D.
author_facet Randall, Patrick A.
Pardo, Marta
Nunes, Eric J.
López Cruz, Laura
Vemuri, V. Kiran
Makriyannis, Alex
Baqi, Younis
Müller, Christa E.
Correa, Mercè
Salamone, John D.
author_sort Randall, Patrick A.
collection PubMed
description Mesolimbic dopamine (DA) is involved in behavioral activation and effort-related processes. Rats with impaired DA transmission reallocate their instrumental behavior away from food-reinforced tasks with high response requirements, and instead select less effortful food-seeking behaviors. In the present study, the effects of several drug treatments were assessed using a progressive ratio (PROG)/chow feeding concurrent choice task. With this task, rats can lever press on a PROG schedule reinforced by a preferred high-carbohydrate food pellet, or alternatively approach and consume the less-preferred but concurrently available laboratory chow. Rats pass through each ratio level 15 times, after which the ratio requirement is incremented by one additional response. The DA D(2) antagonist haloperidol (0.025–0.1 mg/kg) reduced number of lever presses and highest ratio achieved but did not reduce chow intake. In contrast, the adenosine A(2A) antagonist MSX-3 increased lever presses and highest ratio achieved, but decreased chow consumption. The cannabinoid CB1 inverse agonist and putative appetite suppressant AM251 decreased lever presses, highest ratio achieved, and chow intake; this effect was similar to that produced by pre-feeding. Furthermore, DA-related signal transduction activity (pDARPP-32(Thr34) expression) was greater in nucleus accumbens core of high responders (rats with high lever pressing output) compared to low responders. Thus, the effects of DA antagonism differed greatly from those produced by pre-feeding or reduced CB1 transmission, and it appears unlikely that haloperidol reduces PROG responding because of a general reduction in primary food motivation or the unconditioned reinforcing properties of food. Furthermore, accumbens core signal transduction activity is related to individual differences in work output.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3478264
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34782642012-10-29 Dopaminergic Modulation of Effort-Related Choice Behavior as Assessed by a Progressive Ratio Chow Feeding Choice Task: Pharmacological Studies and the Role of Individual Differences Randall, Patrick A. Pardo, Marta Nunes, Eric J. López Cruz, Laura Vemuri, V. Kiran Makriyannis, Alex Baqi, Younis Müller, Christa E. Correa, Mercè Salamone, John D. PLoS One Research Article Mesolimbic dopamine (DA) is involved in behavioral activation and effort-related processes. Rats with impaired DA transmission reallocate their instrumental behavior away from food-reinforced tasks with high response requirements, and instead select less effortful food-seeking behaviors. In the present study, the effects of several drug treatments were assessed using a progressive ratio (PROG)/chow feeding concurrent choice task. With this task, rats can lever press on a PROG schedule reinforced by a preferred high-carbohydrate food pellet, or alternatively approach and consume the less-preferred but concurrently available laboratory chow. Rats pass through each ratio level 15 times, after which the ratio requirement is incremented by one additional response. The DA D(2) antagonist haloperidol (0.025–0.1 mg/kg) reduced number of lever presses and highest ratio achieved but did not reduce chow intake. In contrast, the adenosine A(2A) antagonist MSX-3 increased lever presses and highest ratio achieved, but decreased chow consumption. The cannabinoid CB1 inverse agonist and putative appetite suppressant AM251 decreased lever presses, highest ratio achieved, and chow intake; this effect was similar to that produced by pre-feeding. Furthermore, DA-related signal transduction activity (pDARPP-32(Thr34) expression) was greater in nucleus accumbens core of high responders (rats with high lever pressing output) compared to low responders. Thus, the effects of DA antagonism differed greatly from those produced by pre-feeding or reduced CB1 transmission, and it appears unlikely that haloperidol reduces PROG responding because of a general reduction in primary food motivation or the unconditioned reinforcing properties of food. Furthermore, accumbens core signal transduction activity is related to individual differences in work output. Public Library of Science 2012-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3478264/ /pubmed/23110135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047934 Text en © 2012 Randall et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Randall, Patrick A.
Pardo, Marta
Nunes, Eric J.
López Cruz, Laura
Vemuri, V. Kiran
Makriyannis, Alex
Baqi, Younis
Müller, Christa E.
Correa, Mercè
Salamone, John D.
Dopaminergic Modulation of Effort-Related Choice Behavior as Assessed by a Progressive Ratio Chow Feeding Choice Task: Pharmacological Studies and the Role of Individual Differences
title Dopaminergic Modulation of Effort-Related Choice Behavior as Assessed by a Progressive Ratio Chow Feeding Choice Task: Pharmacological Studies and the Role of Individual Differences
title_full Dopaminergic Modulation of Effort-Related Choice Behavior as Assessed by a Progressive Ratio Chow Feeding Choice Task: Pharmacological Studies and the Role of Individual Differences
title_fullStr Dopaminergic Modulation of Effort-Related Choice Behavior as Assessed by a Progressive Ratio Chow Feeding Choice Task: Pharmacological Studies and the Role of Individual Differences
title_full_unstemmed Dopaminergic Modulation of Effort-Related Choice Behavior as Assessed by a Progressive Ratio Chow Feeding Choice Task: Pharmacological Studies and the Role of Individual Differences
title_short Dopaminergic Modulation of Effort-Related Choice Behavior as Assessed by a Progressive Ratio Chow Feeding Choice Task: Pharmacological Studies and the Role of Individual Differences
title_sort dopaminergic modulation of effort-related choice behavior as assessed by a progressive ratio chow feeding choice task: pharmacological studies and the role of individual differences
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3478264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23110135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047934
work_keys_str_mv AT randallpatricka dopaminergicmodulationofeffortrelatedchoicebehaviorasassessedbyaprogressiveratiochowfeedingchoicetaskpharmacologicalstudiesandtheroleofindividualdifferences
AT pardomarta dopaminergicmodulationofeffortrelatedchoicebehaviorasassessedbyaprogressiveratiochowfeedingchoicetaskpharmacologicalstudiesandtheroleofindividualdifferences
AT nunesericj dopaminergicmodulationofeffortrelatedchoicebehaviorasassessedbyaprogressiveratiochowfeedingchoicetaskpharmacologicalstudiesandtheroleofindividualdifferences
AT lopezcruzlaura dopaminergicmodulationofeffortrelatedchoicebehaviorasassessedbyaprogressiveratiochowfeedingchoicetaskpharmacologicalstudiesandtheroleofindividualdifferences
AT vemurivkiran dopaminergicmodulationofeffortrelatedchoicebehaviorasassessedbyaprogressiveratiochowfeedingchoicetaskpharmacologicalstudiesandtheroleofindividualdifferences
AT makriyannisalex dopaminergicmodulationofeffortrelatedchoicebehaviorasassessedbyaprogressiveratiochowfeedingchoicetaskpharmacologicalstudiesandtheroleofindividualdifferences
AT baqiyounis dopaminergicmodulationofeffortrelatedchoicebehaviorasassessedbyaprogressiveratiochowfeedingchoicetaskpharmacologicalstudiesandtheroleofindividualdifferences
AT mullerchristae dopaminergicmodulationofeffortrelatedchoicebehaviorasassessedbyaprogressiveratiochowfeedingchoicetaskpharmacologicalstudiesandtheroleofindividualdifferences
AT correamerce dopaminergicmodulationofeffortrelatedchoicebehaviorasassessedbyaprogressiveratiochowfeedingchoicetaskpharmacologicalstudiesandtheroleofindividualdifferences
AT salamonejohnd dopaminergicmodulationofeffortrelatedchoicebehaviorasassessedbyaprogressiveratiochowfeedingchoicetaskpharmacologicalstudiesandtheroleofindividualdifferences