Cargando…

Validation Processes of Protein Biomarkers in Serum—A Cross Platform Comparison

Due to insufficient biomarker validation and poor performances in diagnostic assays, the candidate biomarker verification process has to be improved. Multi-analyte immunoassays are the tool of choice for the identification and detailed validation of protein biomarkers in serum. The process of identi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Köhler, Katja, Seitz, Harald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3478866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23112739
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s120912710
_version_ 1782247364452417536
author Köhler, Katja
Seitz, Harald
author_facet Köhler, Katja
Seitz, Harald
author_sort Köhler, Katja
collection PubMed
description Due to insufficient biomarker validation and poor performances in diagnostic assays, the candidate biomarker verification process has to be improved. Multi-analyte immunoassays are the tool of choice for the identification and detailed validation of protein biomarkers in serum. The process of identification and validation of serum biomarkers, as well as their implementation in diagnostic routine requires an application of independent immunoassay platforms with the possibility of high-throughput. This review will focus on three main multi-analyte immunoassay platforms: planar microarrays, multiplex bead systems and, array-based surface plasmon resonance (SPR) chips. Recent developments of each platform will be discussed for application in clinical proteomics, principles, detection methods, and performance strength. The requirements for specific surface functionalization of assay platforms are continuously increasing. The reasons for this increase is the demand for highly sensitive assays, as well as the reduction of non-specific adsorption from complex samples, and with it high signal-to-noise-ratios. To achieve this, different support materials were adapted to the immobilized biomarker/ligand, allowing a high binding capacity and immobilization efficiency. In the case of immunoassays, the immobilized ligands are proteins, antibodies or peptides, which exhibit a diversity of chemical properties (acidic/alkaline; hydrophobic/hydrophilic; secondary or tertiary structure/linear). Consequently it is more challenging to develop immobilization strategies necessary to ensure a homogenous covered surface and reliable assay in comparison to DNA immobilization. New developments concerning material support for each platform are discussed especially with regard to increase the immobilization efficiency and reducing the non-specific adsorption from complex samples like serum and cell lysates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3478866
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34788662012-10-30 Validation Processes of Protein Biomarkers in Serum—A Cross Platform Comparison Köhler, Katja Seitz, Harald Sensors (Basel) Review Due to insufficient biomarker validation and poor performances in diagnostic assays, the candidate biomarker verification process has to be improved. Multi-analyte immunoassays are the tool of choice for the identification and detailed validation of protein biomarkers in serum. The process of identification and validation of serum biomarkers, as well as their implementation in diagnostic routine requires an application of independent immunoassay platforms with the possibility of high-throughput. This review will focus on three main multi-analyte immunoassay platforms: planar microarrays, multiplex bead systems and, array-based surface plasmon resonance (SPR) chips. Recent developments of each platform will be discussed for application in clinical proteomics, principles, detection methods, and performance strength. The requirements for specific surface functionalization of assay platforms are continuously increasing. The reasons for this increase is the demand for highly sensitive assays, as well as the reduction of non-specific adsorption from complex samples, and with it high signal-to-noise-ratios. To achieve this, different support materials were adapted to the immobilized biomarker/ligand, allowing a high binding capacity and immobilization efficiency. In the case of immunoassays, the immobilized ligands are proteins, antibodies or peptides, which exhibit a diversity of chemical properties (acidic/alkaline; hydrophobic/hydrophilic; secondary or tertiary structure/linear). Consequently it is more challenging to develop immobilization strategies necessary to ensure a homogenous covered surface and reliable assay in comparison to DNA immobilization. New developments concerning material support for each platform are discussed especially with regard to increase the immobilization efficiency and reducing the non-specific adsorption from complex samples like serum and cell lysates. Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2012-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3478866/ /pubmed/23112739 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s120912710 Text en © 2012 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Köhler, Katja
Seitz, Harald
Validation Processes of Protein Biomarkers in Serum—A Cross Platform Comparison
title Validation Processes of Protein Biomarkers in Serum—A Cross Platform Comparison
title_full Validation Processes of Protein Biomarkers in Serum—A Cross Platform Comparison
title_fullStr Validation Processes of Protein Biomarkers in Serum—A Cross Platform Comparison
title_full_unstemmed Validation Processes of Protein Biomarkers in Serum—A Cross Platform Comparison
title_short Validation Processes of Protein Biomarkers in Serum—A Cross Platform Comparison
title_sort validation processes of protein biomarkers in serum—a cross platform comparison
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3478866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23112739
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s120912710
work_keys_str_mv AT kohlerkatja validationprocessesofproteinbiomarkersinserumacrossplatformcomparison
AT seitzharald validationprocessesofproteinbiomarkersinserumacrossplatformcomparison