Cargando…

The Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS) in clinical trials: cross-cultural validation in venous thromboembolism patients

BACKGROUND: The Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS) is a 15-item patient-reported instrument of satisfaction with anticoagulant treatment. It includes a 12-item ACTS Burdens scale and a 3-item ACTS Benefits scale. Its role in clinical trials and other settings should be supported by evidence that it is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cano, Stefan J, Lamping, Donna L, Bamber, Luke, Smith, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3478969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23013426
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-10-120
_version_ 1782247372371263488
author Cano, Stefan J
Lamping, Donna L
Bamber, Luke
Smith, Sarah
author_facet Cano, Stefan J
Lamping, Donna L
Bamber, Luke
Smith, Sarah
author_sort Cano, Stefan J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS) is a 15-item patient-reported instrument of satisfaction with anticoagulant treatment. It includes a 12-item ACTS Burdens scale and a 3-item ACTS Benefits scale. Its role in clinical trials and other settings should be supported by evidence that it is both clinically meaningful and scientifically sound. The aim of the study was to evaluate the measurement performance of the ACTS (Dutch, Italian, French, German and English language versions) in patients with venous thromboembolism based on traditional psychometric methods. METHODS: ACTS Burdens and Benefits scale data from a large clinical trial (EINSTEIN DVT) involving 1336 people with venous thromboembolism were analysed at both the scale and item level. Five key psychometric properties were examined using traditional psychometric methods: acceptability, scaling assumptions, reliability (including internal consistency reliability, test-retest reproducibility); validity (including known groups and discriminant validity); and responsiveness. These methods of examination underpin the US Food and Drug Administration recommendations for patient-reported outcome instrument evaluation. RESULTS: Overall, the 12-item ACTS Burdens scale and 3-item ACTS Benefits scale met the psychometric criteria evaluated at both item and scale levels, with the exception of some relatively minor issues in the Dutch language version, which were just below reliability criteria (i.e. alpha = 0.72, test-retest intraclass correlation = 0.79). A consistent finding from item-level evaluations of aggregate endorsement frequencies and skewness suggested that response scales may be improved by reducing the number of response options from five to four. CONCLUSIONS: Both the ACTS Burdens and ACTS Benefits scales consistently satisfied traditional reliability and validity criteria across multiple language datasets, supporting it as a clinically useful patient-reported instrument of satisfaction with anticoagulant treatment in clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00440193
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3478969
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34789692012-10-24 The Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS) in clinical trials: cross-cultural validation in venous thromboembolism patients Cano, Stefan J Lamping, Donna L Bamber, Luke Smith, Sarah Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: The Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS) is a 15-item patient-reported instrument of satisfaction with anticoagulant treatment. It includes a 12-item ACTS Burdens scale and a 3-item ACTS Benefits scale. Its role in clinical trials and other settings should be supported by evidence that it is both clinically meaningful and scientifically sound. The aim of the study was to evaluate the measurement performance of the ACTS (Dutch, Italian, French, German and English language versions) in patients with venous thromboembolism based on traditional psychometric methods. METHODS: ACTS Burdens and Benefits scale data from a large clinical trial (EINSTEIN DVT) involving 1336 people with venous thromboembolism were analysed at both the scale and item level. Five key psychometric properties were examined using traditional psychometric methods: acceptability, scaling assumptions, reliability (including internal consistency reliability, test-retest reproducibility); validity (including known groups and discriminant validity); and responsiveness. These methods of examination underpin the US Food and Drug Administration recommendations for patient-reported outcome instrument evaluation. RESULTS: Overall, the 12-item ACTS Burdens scale and 3-item ACTS Benefits scale met the psychometric criteria evaluated at both item and scale levels, with the exception of some relatively minor issues in the Dutch language version, which were just below reliability criteria (i.e. alpha = 0.72, test-retest intraclass correlation = 0.79). A consistent finding from item-level evaluations of aggregate endorsement frequencies and skewness suggested that response scales may be improved by reducing the number of response options from five to four. CONCLUSIONS: Both the ACTS Burdens and ACTS Benefits scales consistently satisfied traditional reliability and validity criteria across multiple language datasets, supporting it as a clinically useful patient-reported instrument of satisfaction with anticoagulant treatment in clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00440193 BioMed Central 2012-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3478969/ /pubmed/23013426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-10-120 Text en Copyright ©2012 Cano et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Cano, Stefan J
Lamping, Donna L
Bamber, Luke
Smith, Sarah
The Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS) in clinical trials: cross-cultural validation in venous thromboembolism patients
title The Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS) in clinical trials: cross-cultural validation in venous thromboembolism patients
title_full The Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS) in clinical trials: cross-cultural validation in venous thromboembolism patients
title_fullStr The Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS) in clinical trials: cross-cultural validation in venous thromboembolism patients
title_full_unstemmed The Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS) in clinical trials: cross-cultural validation in venous thromboembolism patients
title_short The Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS) in clinical trials: cross-cultural validation in venous thromboembolism patients
title_sort anti-clot treatment scale (acts) in clinical trials: cross-cultural validation in venous thromboembolism patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3478969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23013426
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-10-120
work_keys_str_mv AT canostefanj theanticlottreatmentscaleactsinclinicaltrialscrossculturalvalidationinvenousthromboembolismpatients
AT lampingdonnal theanticlottreatmentscaleactsinclinicaltrialscrossculturalvalidationinvenousthromboembolismpatients
AT bamberluke theanticlottreatmentscaleactsinclinicaltrialscrossculturalvalidationinvenousthromboembolismpatients
AT smithsarah theanticlottreatmentscaleactsinclinicaltrialscrossculturalvalidationinvenousthromboembolismpatients
AT canostefanj anticlottreatmentscaleactsinclinicaltrialscrossculturalvalidationinvenousthromboembolismpatients
AT lampingdonnal anticlottreatmentscaleactsinclinicaltrialscrossculturalvalidationinvenousthromboembolismpatients
AT bamberluke anticlottreatmentscaleactsinclinicaltrialscrossculturalvalidationinvenousthromboembolismpatients
AT smithsarah anticlottreatmentscaleactsinclinicaltrialscrossculturalvalidationinvenousthromboembolismpatients