Cargando…
Assessing the quality of informed consent in a resource-limited setting: A cross-sectional study
BACKGROUND: The process of obtaining informed consent continues to be a contentious issue in clinical and public health research carried out in resource-limited settings. We sought to evaluate this process among human research participants in randomly selected active research studies approved by the...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3478970/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22906301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-13-21 |
_version_ | 1782247372679544832 |
---|---|
author | Kiguba, Ronald Kutyabami, Paul Kiwuwa, Stephen Katabira, Elly Sewankambo, Nelson K |
author_facet | Kiguba, Ronald Kutyabami, Paul Kiwuwa, Stephen Katabira, Elly Sewankambo, Nelson K |
author_sort | Kiguba, Ronald |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The process of obtaining informed consent continues to be a contentious issue in clinical and public health research carried out in resource-limited settings. We sought to evaluate this process among human research participants in randomly selected active research studies approved by the School of Medicine Research and Ethics Committee at the College of Health Sciences, Makerere University. METHODS: Data were collected using semi-structured interviewer-administered questionnaires on clinic days after initial or repeat informed consent procedures for the respective clinical studies had been administered to each study participant. RESULTS: Of the 600 participants interviewed, two thirds (64.2%, 385/600) were female. Overall mean age of study participants was 37.6 (SD = 7.7) years. Amongst all participants, less than a tenth (5.9%, 35/598) reported that they were not given enough information before making a decision to participate. A similar proportion (5.7%, 34/597) reported that they had not signed a consent form prior to making a decision to participate in the study. A third (33.7%, 201/596) of the participants were not aware that they could, at any time, voluntarily withdraw participation from these studies. Participants in clinical trials were 50% less likely than those in observational studies [clinical trial vs. observational; (odds ratio, OR = 0.5; 95% CI: 0.35-0.78)] to perceive that refusal to participate in the parent research project would affect their regular medical care. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the participants signed informed consent forms and a vast majority felt that they received enough information before deciding to participate. On the contrary, several were not aware that they could voluntarily withdraw their participation. Participants in observational studies were more likely than those in clinical trials to perceive that refusal to participate in the parent study would affect their regular medical care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3478970 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34789702012-10-24 Assessing the quality of informed consent in a resource-limited setting: A cross-sectional study Kiguba, Ronald Kutyabami, Paul Kiwuwa, Stephen Katabira, Elly Sewankambo, Nelson K BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: The process of obtaining informed consent continues to be a contentious issue in clinical and public health research carried out in resource-limited settings. We sought to evaluate this process among human research participants in randomly selected active research studies approved by the School of Medicine Research and Ethics Committee at the College of Health Sciences, Makerere University. METHODS: Data were collected using semi-structured interviewer-administered questionnaires on clinic days after initial or repeat informed consent procedures for the respective clinical studies had been administered to each study participant. RESULTS: Of the 600 participants interviewed, two thirds (64.2%, 385/600) were female. Overall mean age of study participants was 37.6 (SD = 7.7) years. Amongst all participants, less than a tenth (5.9%, 35/598) reported that they were not given enough information before making a decision to participate. A similar proportion (5.7%, 34/597) reported that they had not signed a consent form prior to making a decision to participate in the study. A third (33.7%, 201/596) of the participants were not aware that they could, at any time, voluntarily withdraw participation from these studies. Participants in clinical trials were 50% less likely than those in observational studies [clinical trial vs. observational; (odds ratio, OR = 0.5; 95% CI: 0.35-0.78)] to perceive that refusal to participate in the parent research project would affect their regular medical care. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the participants signed informed consent forms and a vast majority felt that they received enough information before deciding to participate. On the contrary, several were not aware that they could voluntarily withdraw their participation. Participants in observational studies were more likely than those in clinical trials to perceive that refusal to participate in the parent study would affect their regular medical care. BioMed Central 2012-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3478970/ /pubmed/22906301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-13-21 Text en Copyright ©2012 Kiguba et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kiguba, Ronald Kutyabami, Paul Kiwuwa, Stephen Katabira, Elly Sewankambo, Nelson K Assessing the quality of informed consent in a resource-limited setting: A cross-sectional study |
title | Assessing the quality of informed consent in a resource-limited setting: A cross-sectional study |
title_full | Assessing the quality of informed consent in a resource-limited setting: A cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Assessing the quality of informed consent in a resource-limited setting: A cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the quality of informed consent in a resource-limited setting: A cross-sectional study |
title_short | Assessing the quality of informed consent in a resource-limited setting: A cross-sectional study |
title_sort | assessing the quality of informed consent in a resource-limited setting: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3478970/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22906301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-13-21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kigubaronald assessingthequalityofinformedconsentinaresourcelimitedsettingacrosssectionalstudy AT kutyabamipaul assessingthequalityofinformedconsentinaresourcelimitedsettingacrosssectionalstudy AT kiwuwastephen assessingthequalityofinformedconsentinaresourcelimitedsettingacrosssectionalstudy AT katabiraelly assessingthequalityofinformedconsentinaresourcelimitedsettingacrosssectionalstudy AT sewankambonelsonk assessingthequalityofinformedconsentinaresourcelimitedsettingacrosssectionalstudy |