Cargando…

Assessing the quality of informed consent in a resource-limited setting: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: The process of obtaining informed consent continues to be a contentious issue in clinical and public health research carried out in resource-limited settings. We sought to evaluate this process among human research participants in randomly selected active research studies approved by the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kiguba, Ronald, Kutyabami, Paul, Kiwuwa, Stephen, Katabira, Elly, Sewankambo, Nelson K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3478970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22906301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-13-21
_version_ 1782247372679544832
author Kiguba, Ronald
Kutyabami, Paul
Kiwuwa, Stephen
Katabira, Elly
Sewankambo, Nelson K
author_facet Kiguba, Ronald
Kutyabami, Paul
Kiwuwa, Stephen
Katabira, Elly
Sewankambo, Nelson K
author_sort Kiguba, Ronald
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The process of obtaining informed consent continues to be a contentious issue in clinical and public health research carried out in resource-limited settings. We sought to evaluate this process among human research participants in randomly selected active research studies approved by the School of Medicine Research and Ethics Committee at the College of Health Sciences, Makerere University. METHODS: Data were collected using semi-structured interviewer-administered questionnaires on clinic days after initial or repeat informed consent procedures for the respective clinical studies had been administered to each study participant. RESULTS: Of the 600 participants interviewed, two thirds (64.2%, 385/600) were female. Overall mean age of study participants was 37.6 (SD = 7.7) years. Amongst all participants, less than a tenth (5.9%, 35/598) reported that they were not given enough information before making a decision to participate. A similar proportion (5.7%, 34/597) reported that they had not signed a consent form prior to making a decision to participate in the study. A third (33.7%, 201/596) of the participants were not aware that they could, at any time, voluntarily withdraw participation from these studies. Participants in clinical trials were 50% less likely than those in observational studies [clinical trial vs. observational; (odds ratio, OR = 0.5; 95% CI: 0.35-0.78)] to perceive that refusal to participate in the parent research project would affect their regular medical care. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the participants signed informed consent forms and a vast majority felt that they received enough information before deciding to participate. On the contrary, several were not aware that they could voluntarily withdraw their participation. Participants in observational studies were more likely than those in clinical trials to perceive that refusal to participate in the parent study would affect their regular medical care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3478970
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34789702012-10-24 Assessing the quality of informed consent in a resource-limited setting: A cross-sectional study Kiguba, Ronald Kutyabami, Paul Kiwuwa, Stephen Katabira, Elly Sewankambo, Nelson K BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: The process of obtaining informed consent continues to be a contentious issue in clinical and public health research carried out in resource-limited settings. We sought to evaluate this process among human research participants in randomly selected active research studies approved by the School of Medicine Research and Ethics Committee at the College of Health Sciences, Makerere University. METHODS: Data were collected using semi-structured interviewer-administered questionnaires on clinic days after initial or repeat informed consent procedures for the respective clinical studies had been administered to each study participant. RESULTS: Of the 600 participants interviewed, two thirds (64.2%, 385/600) were female. Overall mean age of study participants was 37.6 (SD = 7.7) years. Amongst all participants, less than a tenth (5.9%, 35/598) reported that they were not given enough information before making a decision to participate. A similar proportion (5.7%, 34/597) reported that they had not signed a consent form prior to making a decision to participate in the study. A third (33.7%, 201/596) of the participants were not aware that they could, at any time, voluntarily withdraw participation from these studies. Participants in clinical trials were 50% less likely than those in observational studies [clinical trial vs. observational; (odds ratio, OR = 0.5; 95% CI: 0.35-0.78)] to perceive that refusal to participate in the parent research project would affect their regular medical care. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the participants signed informed consent forms and a vast majority felt that they received enough information before deciding to participate. On the contrary, several were not aware that they could voluntarily withdraw their participation. Participants in observational studies were more likely than those in clinical trials to perceive that refusal to participate in the parent study would affect their regular medical care. BioMed Central 2012-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3478970/ /pubmed/22906301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-13-21 Text en Copyright ©2012 Kiguba et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kiguba, Ronald
Kutyabami, Paul
Kiwuwa, Stephen
Katabira, Elly
Sewankambo, Nelson K
Assessing the quality of informed consent in a resource-limited setting: A cross-sectional study
title Assessing the quality of informed consent in a resource-limited setting: A cross-sectional study
title_full Assessing the quality of informed consent in a resource-limited setting: A cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Assessing the quality of informed consent in a resource-limited setting: A cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the quality of informed consent in a resource-limited setting: A cross-sectional study
title_short Assessing the quality of informed consent in a resource-limited setting: A cross-sectional study
title_sort assessing the quality of informed consent in a resource-limited setting: a cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3478970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22906301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-13-21
work_keys_str_mv AT kigubaronald assessingthequalityofinformedconsentinaresourcelimitedsettingacrosssectionalstudy
AT kutyabamipaul assessingthequalityofinformedconsentinaresourcelimitedsettingacrosssectionalstudy
AT kiwuwastephen assessingthequalityofinformedconsentinaresourcelimitedsettingacrosssectionalstudy
AT katabiraelly assessingthequalityofinformedconsentinaresourcelimitedsettingacrosssectionalstudy
AT sewankambonelsonk assessingthequalityofinformedconsentinaresourcelimitedsettingacrosssectionalstudy