Cargando…

Correlation of pretreatment drug induced apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells with patient survival and clinical response

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to determine if a chemotherapy-induced apoptosis assay (MiCK) could predict the best therapy for patients with ovarian cancer. METHODS: A prospective, multi-institutional and blinded trial of the assay was conducted in 104 evaluable ovarian cancer patients treate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salom, Emery, Penalver, Manuel, Homesley, Howard, Burrell, Matthew, Garrett, Audrey, Presant, Cary A, Rutledge, James, Chernick, Michael, Hallquist, Allan, Perree, Mathieu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3478976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22873358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-10-162
_version_ 1782247374096171008
author Salom, Emery
Penalver, Manuel
Homesley, Howard
Burrell, Matthew
Garrett, Audrey
Presant, Cary A
Rutledge, James
Chernick, Michael
Hallquist, Allan
Perree, Mathieu
author_facet Salom, Emery
Penalver, Manuel
Homesley, Howard
Burrell, Matthew
Garrett, Audrey
Presant, Cary A
Rutledge, James
Chernick, Michael
Hallquist, Allan
Perree, Mathieu
author_sort Salom, Emery
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study was performed to determine if a chemotherapy-induced apoptosis assay (MiCK) could predict the best therapy for patients with ovarian cancer. METHODS: A prospective, multi-institutional and blinded trial of the assay was conducted in 104 evaluable ovarian cancer patients treated with chemotherapy. The MiCK assay was performed prior to therapy, but treating physicians were not told of the results and selected treatment only on clinical criteria. Outcomes (response, time to relapse, and survival) were compared to the drug-induced apoptosis observed in the assay. RESULTS: Overall survival in primary therapy, chemotherapy naïve patients with Stage III or IV disease was longer if patients received a chemotherapy which was best in the MiCK assay, compared to shorter survival in patients who received a chemotherapy that was not the best. (p < 0.01, hazard ratio HR 0.23). Multivariate model risk ratio showed use of the best chemotherapy in the MiCK assay was the strongest predictor of overall survival (p < 0.01) in stage III or IV patients. Standard therapy with carboplatin plus paclitaxel (C + P) was not the best chemotherapy in the MiCK assay in 44% of patients. If patients received C + P and it was the best chemotherapy in the MiCK assay, they had longer survival than those patients receiving C + P when it was not the best chemotherapy in the assay (p = 0.03). Relapse-free interval in primary therapy patients was longer if patients received the best chemotherapy from the MiCK assay (p = 0.03, HR 0.52). Response rates (CR + PR) were higher if physicians used an active chemotherapy based on the MiCK assay (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: The MiCK assay can predict the chemotherapy associated with better outcomes in ovarian cancer patients. This study quantifies outcome benefits on which a prospective randomized trial can be developed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3478976
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34789762012-10-24 Correlation of pretreatment drug induced apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells with patient survival and clinical response Salom, Emery Penalver, Manuel Homesley, Howard Burrell, Matthew Garrett, Audrey Presant, Cary A Rutledge, James Chernick, Michael Hallquist, Allan Perree, Mathieu J Transl Med Research BACKGROUND: This study was performed to determine if a chemotherapy-induced apoptosis assay (MiCK) could predict the best therapy for patients with ovarian cancer. METHODS: A prospective, multi-institutional and blinded trial of the assay was conducted in 104 evaluable ovarian cancer patients treated with chemotherapy. The MiCK assay was performed prior to therapy, but treating physicians were not told of the results and selected treatment only on clinical criteria. Outcomes (response, time to relapse, and survival) were compared to the drug-induced apoptosis observed in the assay. RESULTS: Overall survival in primary therapy, chemotherapy naïve patients with Stage III or IV disease was longer if patients received a chemotherapy which was best in the MiCK assay, compared to shorter survival in patients who received a chemotherapy that was not the best. (p < 0.01, hazard ratio HR 0.23). Multivariate model risk ratio showed use of the best chemotherapy in the MiCK assay was the strongest predictor of overall survival (p < 0.01) in stage III or IV patients. Standard therapy with carboplatin plus paclitaxel (C + P) was not the best chemotherapy in the MiCK assay in 44% of patients. If patients received C + P and it was the best chemotherapy in the MiCK assay, they had longer survival than those patients receiving C + P when it was not the best chemotherapy in the assay (p = 0.03). Relapse-free interval in primary therapy patients was longer if patients received the best chemotherapy from the MiCK assay (p = 0.03, HR 0.52). Response rates (CR + PR) were higher if physicians used an active chemotherapy based on the MiCK assay (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: The MiCK assay can predict the chemotherapy associated with better outcomes in ovarian cancer patients. This study quantifies outcome benefits on which a prospective randomized trial can be developed. BioMed Central 2012-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3478976/ /pubmed/22873358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-10-162 Text en Copyright ©2012 Salom et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Salom, Emery
Penalver, Manuel
Homesley, Howard
Burrell, Matthew
Garrett, Audrey
Presant, Cary A
Rutledge, James
Chernick, Michael
Hallquist, Allan
Perree, Mathieu
Correlation of pretreatment drug induced apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells with patient survival and clinical response
title Correlation of pretreatment drug induced apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells with patient survival and clinical response
title_full Correlation of pretreatment drug induced apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells with patient survival and clinical response
title_fullStr Correlation of pretreatment drug induced apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells with patient survival and clinical response
title_full_unstemmed Correlation of pretreatment drug induced apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells with patient survival and clinical response
title_short Correlation of pretreatment drug induced apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells with patient survival and clinical response
title_sort correlation of pretreatment drug induced apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells with patient survival and clinical response
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3478976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22873358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-10-162
work_keys_str_mv AT salomemery correlationofpretreatmentdruginducedapoptosisinovariancancercellswithpatientsurvivalandclinicalresponse
AT penalvermanuel correlationofpretreatmentdruginducedapoptosisinovariancancercellswithpatientsurvivalandclinicalresponse
AT homesleyhoward correlationofpretreatmentdruginducedapoptosisinovariancancercellswithpatientsurvivalandclinicalresponse
AT burrellmatthew correlationofpretreatmentdruginducedapoptosisinovariancancercellswithpatientsurvivalandclinicalresponse
AT garrettaudrey correlationofpretreatmentdruginducedapoptosisinovariancancercellswithpatientsurvivalandclinicalresponse
AT presantcarya correlationofpretreatmentdruginducedapoptosisinovariancancercellswithpatientsurvivalandclinicalresponse
AT rutledgejames correlationofpretreatmentdruginducedapoptosisinovariancancercellswithpatientsurvivalandclinicalresponse
AT chernickmichael correlationofpretreatmentdruginducedapoptosisinovariancancercellswithpatientsurvivalandclinicalresponse
AT hallquistallan correlationofpretreatmentdruginducedapoptosisinovariancancercellswithpatientsurvivalandclinicalresponse
AT perreemathieu correlationofpretreatmentdruginducedapoptosisinovariancancercellswithpatientsurvivalandclinicalresponse