Cargando…
Biases and Power for Groups Comparison on Subjective Health Measurements
Subjective health measurements are increasingly used in clinical research, particularly for patient groups comparisons. Two main types of analytical strategies can be used for such data: so-called classical test theory (CTT), relying on observed scores and models coming from Item Response Theory (IR...
Autores principales: | Hamel, Jean-François, Hardouin, Jean-Benoit, Le Neel, Tanguy, Kubis, Gildas, Roquelaure, Yves, Sébille, Véronique |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3480365/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23115620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044695 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Methodological issues regarding power of classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT)-based approaches for the comparison of patient-reported outcomes in two groups of patients - a simulation study
por: Sébille, Véronique, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Power and Sample Size Determination for the Group Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes with Rasch Family Models
por: Blanchin, Myriam, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
A simple ratio-based approach for power and sample size determination for 2-group
comparison using Rasch models
por: Sébille, Véronique, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Power and sample size determination for the group comparison of patient-reported outcomes using the Rasch model: impact of a misspecification of the parameters
por: Blanchin, Myriam, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Power and Sample Size Determination in the Rasch Model: Evaluation of the Robustness of a Numerical Method to Non-Normality of the Latent Trait
por: Guilleux, Alice, et al.
Publicado: (2014)