Cargando…

Accrual in supportive care trials in pediatric oncology, a challenge!

PURPOSE: Treatment protocols in pediatric oncology have historically known high accrual rates, up to 94 %. Accrual for supportive care studies on the other hand appears to be a challenge. The aim of this study was to search for reasons explaining this poor accrual and for possible interventions to i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schoot, R. A., van Ommen, C. H., Caron, H. N., Tissing, W. J. E., van de Wetering, M. D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3480590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22476398
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1447-2
_version_ 1782247585349632000
author Schoot, R. A.
van Ommen, C. H.
Caron, H. N.
Tissing, W. J. E.
van de Wetering, M. D.
author_facet Schoot, R. A.
van Ommen, C. H.
Caron, H. N.
Tissing, W. J. E.
van de Wetering, M. D.
author_sort Schoot, R. A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Treatment protocols in pediatric oncology have historically known high accrual rates, up to 94 %. Accrual for supportive care studies on the other hand appears to be a challenge. The aim of this study was to search for reasons explaining this poor accrual and for possible interventions to improve patient enrolment. METHODS: The failure screen log of our supportive care study (the Aristocaths study) was analyzed, and subsequently, a literature search was performed. RESULTS: The literature search (1985–2011) revealed three factors that can influence accrual. Firstly, study implementation and patient enrolment can be facilitated by appointing a dedicated clinical investigator in all participating centers and by facilitating clinical research nurses. Furthermore, adequate and tailor-made information is required for families to make a well-informed decision regarding study participation. Lastly, sufficient time should be assured for the process of decision making, especially since the number of eligible studies is increasing rapidly. Concerning our study, all three elements were met, but the most striking finding was the presumed burden of study participation by the majority of parents (82 %) as the main argument against randomization. CONCLUSIONS: Accrual of pediatric oncology patients in supportive care studies is challenging. Nevertheless, well-designed randomized controlled trials in supportive care will be essential for the improvement of pediatric cancer care. Therefore, we will need to increase awareness through (inter)national supportive care working groups regarding the need for supportive care trials and stimulate accrual when such trials are open.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3480590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34805902012-11-01 Accrual in supportive care trials in pediatric oncology, a challenge! Schoot, R. A. van Ommen, C. H. Caron, H. N. Tissing, W. J. E. van de Wetering, M. D. Support Care Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: Treatment protocols in pediatric oncology have historically known high accrual rates, up to 94 %. Accrual for supportive care studies on the other hand appears to be a challenge. The aim of this study was to search for reasons explaining this poor accrual and for possible interventions to improve patient enrolment. METHODS: The failure screen log of our supportive care study (the Aristocaths study) was analyzed, and subsequently, a literature search was performed. RESULTS: The literature search (1985–2011) revealed three factors that can influence accrual. Firstly, study implementation and patient enrolment can be facilitated by appointing a dedicated clinical investigator in all participating centers and by facilitating clinical research nurses. Furthermore, adequate and tailor-made information is required for families to make a well-informed decision regarding study participation. Lastly, sufficient time should be assured for the process of decision making, especially since the number of eligible studies is increasing rapidly. Concerning our study, all three elements were met, but the most striking finding was the presumed burden of study participation by the majority of parents (82 %) as the main argument against randomization. CONCLUSIONS: Accrual of pediatric oncology patients in supportive care studies is challenging. Nevertheless, well-designed randomized controlled trials in supportive care will be essential for the improvement of pediatric cancer care. Therefore, we will need to increase awareness through (inter)national supportive care working groups regarding the need for supportive care trials and stimulate accrual when such trials are open. Springer-Verlag 2012-04-04 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3480590/ /pubmed/22476398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1447-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Schoot, R. A.
van Ommen, C. H.
Caron, H. N.
Tissing, W. J. E.
van de Wetering, M. D.
Accrual in supportive care trials in pediatric oncology, a challenge!
title Accrual in supportive care trials in pediatric oncology, a challenge!
title_full Accrual in supportive care trials in pediatric oncology, a challenge!
title_fullStr Accrual in supportive care trials in pediatric oncology, a challenge!
title_full_unstemmed Accrual in supportive care trials in pediatric oncology, a challenge!
title_short Accrual in supportive care trials in pediatric oncology, a challenge!
title_sort accrual in supportive care trials in pediatric oncology, a challenge!
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3480590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22476398
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1447-2
work_keys_str_mv AT schootra accrualinsupportivecaretrialsinpediatriconcologyachallenge
AT vanommench accrualinsupportivecaretrialsinpediatriconcologyachallenge
AT caronhn accrualinsupportivecaretrialsinpediatriconcologyachallenge
AT tissingwje accrualinsupportivecaretrialsinpediatriconcologyachallenge
AT vandeweteringmd accrualinsupportivecaretrialsinpediatriconcologyachallenge
AT accrualinsupportivecaretrialsinpediatriconcologyachallenge