Cargando…

Deterministic Versus Stochastic Cell Polarisation Through Wave-Pinning

Cell polarization is an important part of the response of eukaryotic cells to stimuli, and forms a primary step in cell motility, differentiation, and many cellular functions. Among the important biochemical players implicated in the onset of intracellular asymmetries that constitute the early phase...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walther, Georg R., Marée, Athanasius F. M., Edelstein-Keshet, Leah, Grieneisen, Verônica A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3480592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22956290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11538-012-9766-5
_version_ 1782247585871822848
author Walther, Georg R.
Marée, Athanasius F. M.
Edelstein-Keshet, Leah
Grieneisen, Verônica A.
author_facet Walther, Georg R.
Marée, Athanasius F. M.
Edelstein-Keshet, Leah
Grieneisen, Verônica A.
author_sort Walther, Georg R.
collection PubMed
description Cell polarization is an important part of the response of eukaryotic cells to stimuli, and forms a primary step in cell motility, differentiation, and many cellular functions. Among the important biochemical players implicated in the onset of intracellular asymmetries that constitute the early phases of polarization are the Rho GTPases, such as Cdc42, Rac, and Rho, which present high active concentration levels in a spatially localized manner. Rho GTPases exhibit positive feedback-driven interconversion between distinct active and inactive forms, the former residing on the cell membrane, and the latter predominantly in the cytosol. A deterministic model of the dynamics of a single Rho GTPase described earlier by Mori et al. exhibits sustained polarization by a wave-pinning mechanism. It remained, however, unclear how such polarization behaves at typically low cellular concentrations, as stochasticity could significantly affect the dynamics. We therefore study the low copy number dynamics of this model, using a stochastic kinetics framework based on the Gillespie algorithm, and propose statistical and analytic techniques which help us analyse the equilibrium behaviour of our stochastic system. We use local perturbation analysis to predict parameter regimes for initiation of polarity and wave-pinning in our deterministic system, and compare these predictions with deterministic and stochastic spatial simulations. Comparing the behaviour of the stochastic with the deterministic system, we determine the threshold number of molecules required for robust polarization in a given effective reaction volume. We show that when the molecule number is lowered wave-pinning behaviour is lost due to an increasingly large transition zone as well as increasing fluctuations in the pinning position, due to which a broadness can be reached that is unsustainable, causing the collapse of the wave, while the variations in the high and low equilibrium levels are much less affected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3480592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34805922012-11-01 Deterministic Versus Stochastic Cell Polarisation Through Wave-Pinning Walther, Georg R. Marée, Athanasius F. M. Edelstein-Keshet, Leah Grieneisen, Verônica A. Bull Math Biol Original Article Cell polarization is an important part of the response of eukaryotic cells to stimuli, and forms a primary step in cell motility, differentiation, and many cellular functions. Among the important biochemical players implicated in the onset of intracellular asymmetries that constitute the early phases of polarization are the Rho GTPases, such as Cdc42, Rac, and Rho, which present high active concentration levels in a spatially localized manner. Rho GTPases exhibit positive feedback-driven interconversion between distinct active and inactive forms, the former residing on the cell membrane, and the latter predominantly in the cytosol. A deterministic model of the dynamics of a single Rho GTPase described earlier by Mori et al. exhibits sustained polarization by a wave-pinning mechanism. It remained, however, unclear how such polarization behaves at typically low cellular concentrations, as stochasticity could significantly affect the dynamics. We therefore study the low copy number dynamics of this model, using a stochastic kinetics framework based on the Gillespie algorithm, and propose statistical and analytic techniques which help us analyse the equilibrium behaviour of our stochastic system. We use local perturbation analysis to predict parameter regimes for initiation of polarity and wave-pinning in our deterministic system, and compare these predictions with deterministic and stochastic spatial simulations. Comparing the behaviour of the stochastic with the deterministic system, we determine the threshold number of molecules required for robust polarization in a given effective reaction volume. We show that when the molecule number is lowered wave-pinning behaviour is lost due to an increasingly large transition zone as well as increasing fluctuations in the pinning position, due to which a broadness can be reached that is unsustainable, causing the collapse of the wave, while the variations in the high and low equilibrium levels are much less affected. Springer-Verlag 2012-09-07 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3480592/ /pubmed/22956290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11538-012-9766-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Walther, Georg R.
Marée, Athanasius F. M.
Edelstein-Keshet, Leah
Grieneisen, Verônica A.
Deterministic Versus Stochastic Cell Polarisation Through Wave-Pinning
title Deterministic Versus Stochastic Cell Polarisation Through Wave-Pinning
title_full Deterministic Versus Stochastic Cell Polarisation Through Wave-Pinning
title_fullStr Deterministic Versus Stochastic Cell Polarisation Through Wave-Pinning
title_full_unstemmed Deterministic Versus Stochastic Cell Polarisation Through Wave-Pinning
title_short Deterministic Versus Stochastic Cell Polarisation Through Wave-Pinning
title_sort deterministic versus stochastic cell polarisation through wave-pinning
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3480592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22956290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11538-012-9766-5
work_keys_str_mv AT walthergeorgr deterministicversusstochasticcellpolarisationthroughwavepinning
AT mareeathanasiusfm deterministicversusstochasticcellpolarisationthroughwavepinning
AT edelsteinkeshetleah deterministicversusstochasticcellpolarisationthroughwavepinning
AT grieneisenveronicaa deterministicversusstochasticcellpolarisationthroughwavepinning