Cargando…

Communicating with parents about vaccination: a framework for health professionals

BACKGROUND: A critical factor shaping parental attitudes to vaccination is the parent’s interactions with health professionals. An effective interaction can address the concerns of vaccine supportive parents and motivate a hesitant parent towards vaccine acceptance. Poor communication can contribute...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leask, Julie, Kinnersley, Paul, Jackson, Cath, Cheater, Francine, Bedford, Helen, Rowles, Greg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3480952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22998654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-12-154
_version_ 1782247666265096192
author Leask, Julie
Kinnersley, Paul
Jackson, Cath
Cheater, Francine
Bedford, Helen
Rowles, Greg
author_facet Leask, Julie
Kinnersley, Paul
Jackson, Cath
Cheater, Francine
Bedford, Helen
Rowles, Greg
author_sort Leask, Julie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A critical factor shaping parental attitudes to vaccination is the parent’s interactions with health professionals. An effective interaction can address the concerns of vaccine supportive parents and motivate a hesitant parent towards vaccine acceptance. Poor communication can contribute to rejection of vaccinations or dissatisfaction with care. We sought to provide a framework for health professionals when communicating with parents about vaccination. METHODS: Literature review to identify a spectrum of parent attitudes or ‘positions’ on childhood vaccination with estimates of the proportion of each group based on population studies. Development of a framework related to each parental position with determination of key indicators, goals and strategies based on communication science, motivational interviewing and valid consent principles. RESULTS: Five distinct parental groups were identified: the ‘unquestioning acceptor’ (30–40%), the ‘cautious acceptor’ (25–35%); the ‘hesitant’ (20–30%); the ‘late or selective vaccinator’ (2–27%); and the ‘refuser’ of all vaccines (<2%). The goals of the encounter with each group will vary, depending on the parents’ readiness to vaccinate. In all encounters, health professionals should build rapport, accept questions and concerns, and facilitate valid consent. For the hesitant, late or selective vaccinators, or refusers, strategies should include use of a guiding style and eliciting the parent’s own motivations to vaccinate while, avoiding excessive persuasion and adversarial debates. It may be necessary to book another appointment or offer attendance at a specialised adverse events clinic. Good information resources should also be used. CONCLUSIONS: Health professionals have a central role in maintaining public trust in vaccination, including addressing parents’ concerns. These recommendations are tailored to specific parental positions on vaccination and provide a structured approach to assist professionals. They advocate respectful interactions that aim to guide parents towards quality decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3480952
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34809522012-10-27 Communicating with parents about vaccination: a framework for health professionals Leask, Julie Kinnersley, Paul Jackson, Cath Cheater, Francine Bedford, Helen Rowles, Greg BMC Pediatr Correspondence BACKGROUND: A critical factor shaping parental attitudes to vaccination is the parent’s interactions with health professionals. An effective interaction can address the concerns of vaccine supportive parents and motivate a hesitant parent towards vaccine acceptance. Poor communication can contribute to rejection of vaccinations or dissatisfaction with care. We sought to provide a framework for health professionals when communicating with parents about vaccination. METHODS: Literature review to identify a spectrum of parent attitudes or ‘positions’ on childhood vaccination with estimates of the proportion of each group based on population studies. Development of a framework related to each parental position with determination of key indicators, goals and strategies based on communication science, motivational interviewing and valid consent principles. RESULTS: Five distinct parental groups were identified: the ‘unquestioning acceptor’ (30–40%), the ‘cautious acceptor’ (25–35%); the ‘hesitant’ (20–30%); the ‘late or selective vaccinator’ (2–27%); and the ‘refuser’ of all vaccines (<2%). The goals of the encounter with each group will vary, depending on the parents’ readiness to vaccinate. In all encounters, health professionals should build rapport, accept questions and concerns, and facilitate valid consent. For the hesitant, late or selective vaccinators, or refusers, strategies should include use of a guiding style and eliciting the parent’s own motivations to vaccinate while, avoiding excessive persuasion and adversarial debates. It may be necessary to book another appointment or offer attendance at a specialised adverse events clinic. Good information resources should also be used. CONCLUSIONS: Health professionals have a central role in maintaining public trust in vaccination, including addressing parents’ concerns. These recommendations are tailored to specific parental positions on vaccination and provide a structured approach to assist professionals. They advocate respectful interactions that aim to guide parents towards quality decisions. BioMed Central 2012-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3480952/ /pubmed/22998654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-12-154 Text en Copyright ©2012 Leask et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Correspondence
Leask, Julie
Kinnersley, Paul
Jackson, Cath
Cheater, Francine
Bedford, Helen
Rowles, Greg
Communicating with parents about vaccination: a framework for health professionals
title Communicating with parents about vaccination: a framework for health professionals
title_full Communicating with parents about vaccination: a framework for health professionals
title_fullStr Communicating with parents about vaccination: a framework for health professionals
title_full_unstemmed Communicating with parents about vaccination: a framework for health professionals
title_short Communicating with parents about vaccination: a framework for health professionals
title_sort communicating with parents about vaccination: a framework for health professionals
topic Correspondence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3480952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22998654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-12-154
work_keys_str_mv AT leaskjulie communicatingwithparentsaboutvaccinationaframeworkforhealthprofessionals
AT kinnersleypaul communicatingwithparentsaboutvaccinationaframeworkforhealthprofessionals
AT jacksoncath communicatingwithparentsaboutvaccinationaframeworkforhealthprofessionals
AT cheaterfrancine communicatingwithparentsaboutvaccinationaframeworkforhealthprofessionals
AT bedfordhelen communicatingwithparentsaboutvaccinationaframeworkforhealthprofessionals
AT rowlesgreg communicatingwithparentsaboutvaccinationaframeworkforhealthprofessionals