Cargando…

Robotic Retroperitoneal Partial Nephrectomy: A Four-Arm Approach

INTRODUCTION: Robotic partial nephrectomy is an effective alternative to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. The 3-arm and 4-arm transperitoneal robotic approaches are well described in the literature. However, a retroperitoneal robotic technique has yet to be fully described. We report our technique...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feliciano, Joseph, Stifelman, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3481227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23477167
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13427982376149
_version_ 1782247703922606080
author Feliciano, Joseph
Stifelman, Michael
author_facet Feliciano, Joseph
Stifelman, Michael
author_sort Feliciano, Joseph
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Robotic partial nephrectomy is an effective alternative to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. The 3-arm and 4-arm transperitoneal robotic approaches are well described in the literature. However, a retroperitoneal robotic technique has yet to be fully described. We report our technique and initial experience with robotic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy with a novel 4-arm approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed our current experience with the robotic retroperitoneal approach. Descriptive statistics on patient characteristics, operative parameters, and oncologic outcomes are reported. RESULTS: A total of 67 robotic-assisted partial nephrectomies were performed by one surgeon between October 2009 and October 2010. The 4-arm retroperitoneal approach was used in 8 patients (12%) with no complications. Median tumor size was 2cm. All were posterior renal tumors, with 5 located in the upper pole. The median operative time, warm ischemia time, estimated blood loss, and length of stay were 202 minutes, 18 minutes, 100cc, and 2 days, respectively. Pathology indicated renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in 7 patients with negative margins. CONCLUSION: The 4-arm robotic approach to retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy is safe, reproducible, and easily used. The fourth arm provides optimal traction on target tissues in key maneuvers and may decrease complications and positive margins secondary to impaired exposure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3481227
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34812272012-11-02 Robotic Retroperitoneal Partial Nephrectomy: A Four-Arm Approach Feliciano, Joseph Stifelman, Michael JSLS Scientific Papers INTRODUCTION: Robotic partial nephrectomy is an effective alternative to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. The 3-arm and 4-arm transperitoneal robotic approaches are well described in the literature. However, a retroperitoneal robotic technique has yet to be fully described. We report our technique and initial experience with robotic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy with a novel 4-arm approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed our current experience with the robotic retroperitoneal approach. Descriptive statistics on patient characteristics, operative parameters, and oncologic outcomes are reported. RESULTS: A total of 67 robotic-assisted partial nephrectomies were performed by one surgeon between October 2009 and October 2010. The 4-arm retroperitoneal approach was used in 8 patients (12%) with no complications. Median tumor size was 2cm. All were posterior renal tumors, with 5 located in the upper pole. The median operative time, warm ischemia time, estimated blood loss, and length of stay were 202 minutes, 18 minutes, 100cc, and 2 days, respectively. Pathology indicated renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in 7 patients with negative margins. CONCLUSION: The 4-arm robotic approach to retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy is safe, reproducible, and easily used. The fourth arm provides optimal traction on target tissues in key maneuvers and may decrease complications and positive margins secondary to impaired exposure. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3481227/ /pubmed/23477167 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13427982376149 Text en © 2012 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Scientific Papers
Feliciano, Joseph
Stifelman, Michael
Robotic Retroperitoneal Partial Nephrectomy: A Four-Arm Approach
title Robotic Retroperitoneal Partial Nephrectomy: A Four-Arm Approach
title_full Robotic Retroperitoneal Partial Nephrectomy: A Four-Arm Approach
title_fullStr Robotic Retroperitoneal Partial Nephrectomy: A Four-Arm Approach
title_full_unstemmed Robotic Retroperitoneal Partial Nephrectomy: A Four-Arm Approach
title_short Robotic Retroperitoneal Partial Nephrectomy: A Four-Arm Approach
title_sort robotic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy: a four-arm approach
topic Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3481227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23477167
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13427982376149
work_keys_str_mv AT felicianojoseph roboticretroperitonealpartialnephrectomyafourarmapproach
AT stifelmanmichael roboticretroperitonealpartialnephrectomyafourarmapproach